- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Volume 55, Issue 1
f Nomenclature and taxonomy of the genus Salmonella
- Authors: B. J. Tindall1, P. A. D. Grimont2, G. M. Garrity3, J. P. Euzéby4
- VIEW AFFILIATIONS
Affiliations: 1 1DSMZ – Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Mascheroder Weg 1b, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany 2 2Unité de Biodiversité des Bactéries Pathogènes Emergentes, INSERM U389, Institut Pasteur, F-75724 Paris Cedex 15, France 3 3Bergey's Manual Trust, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, 6162 Biomedical Physical Sciences Bldg, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-4320, USA 4 4Société de Bactériologie Systématique et Vétérinaire (SBSV) and Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), 23 Chemin des Capelles, BP 87614, F-31076 Toulouse Cedex 03, France
- CorrespondenceB. J. Tindall email@example.com
- Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, January 2005 55: 521-524, doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63580-0
- Subject: International Committee On Systematics Of Prokaryotes - Taxonomic Note
- Published Online:
The nomenclature of the genus Salmonella has reached an unsatisfactory state of affairs, with two systems of nomenclature in circulation. One system, proposed in the 1980s by Le Minor and Popoff, has received wide acceptance, although it does not conform to the rules of the Bacteriological Code. The other system, which conforms to the rules of the Bacteriological Code, is being used by an ever-decreasing minority. As a result of a number of recent Requests for an Opinion, the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on the Systematics of Prokaryotes has issued an Opinion (Opinion 80) with the intention that it should solve these discrepancies. However, like all Opinions, it is limited to matters of nomenclature and does not help to interpret the taxonomic consequences. The Judicial Commission has therefore asked experts in the field of nomenclature and taxonomy to write a commentary on the nomenclatural and taxonomic consequences of Opinion 80. The present article explains the nomenclatural consequences of Opinion 80, together with a clear presentation of the taxonomy that results when applying the currently widely accepted interpretation that the genus Salmonella currently includes only two species.
SGM | Published by the International Union of Microbiological Societies
Euzéby, J. P. ( 1999 ). Revised Salmonella nomenclature: designation of Salmonella enterica (ex Kauffmann and Edwards 1952) Le Minor and Popoff 1987 sp. nov., nom. rev. as the neotype species of the genus Salmonella Lignieres 1900 (Approved Lists 1980), rejection of the name Salmonella choleraesuis (Smith 1894) Weldin 1927 (Approved Lists 1980), and conservation of the name Salmonella typhi (Schroeter 1886) Warren and Scott 1930 (Approved Lists 1980). Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 927–930.[CrossRef]
Ezaki, T., Amano, M., Kawamura, Y. & Yabuuchi, E. ( 2000a ). Proposal of Salmonella paratyphi sp. nov., nom. rev. and Request for an Opinion to conserve the specific epithet paratyphi in the binary combination Salmonella paratyphi as nomen epitheton conservandum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 941–944.[CrossRef]
Ezaki, T., Kawamura, Y. & Yabuuchi, E. ( 2000b ). Recognition of nomenclatural standing of Salmonella typhi (Approved Lists 1980), Salmonella enteritidis (Approved Lists 1980) and Salmonella typhimurium (Approved Lists 1980), and conservation of specific epithets enteritidis and typhimurium. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 945–947.[CrossRef]
Judicial Commission ( 2005 ). The type species of the genus Salmonella Lignieres 1900 is Salmonella enterica (ex Kauffmann and Edwards 1952) Le Minor and Popoff 1987 , with the type strain LT2T, and conservation of the epithet enterica in Salmonella enterica over all earlier epithets that may be applied to this species. Opinion 80. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 519–520.[CrossRef]
Le Minor, L. & Popoff, M. Y. ( 1987 ). Request for an Opinion. Designation of Salmonella enterica sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus Salmonella. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 465–468.[CrossRef]
Le Minor, L., Véron, M. & Popoff, M. Y. ( 1982 ). Proposition pour une nomenclature des Salmonella. Ann Microbiol Paris 133B, 245–254 (in French).
Le Minor, L., Véron, M. & Popoff, M. Y. ( 1985 ). Salmonella cholerae-suis subsp. arizonae comb. nov. etc. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 18. Int J Syst Bacteriol 35, 375–376.[CrossRef]
Le Minor, L., Popoff, M. Y., Laurent, B. & Hermant, D. ( 1987 ). Salmonella choleraesuis subsp. indica subsp. nov. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 23. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 179–180.[CrossRef]
Reeves, M. W., Evins, G. M., Heiba, A. A., Plikaytis, B. D. & Farmer, J. J., III ( 1989 ). Clonal nature of Salmonella typhi and its genetic relatedness to other salmonellae as shown by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and proposal of Salmonella bongori comb. nov. J Clin Microbiol 27, 313–320.
Wayne, L. G. ( 1994 ). Actions of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology on requests for opinions published between January 1985 and July 1993. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 177–178.[CrossRef]
Yabuuchi, E. & Ezaki, T. ( 2000 ). Arguments against the replacement of type species of the genus Salmonella from Salmonella choleraesuis to ‘Salmonella enterica’ and the creation of the term ‘neotype species’, and for conservation of Salmonella choleraesuis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 1693–1694.[CrossRef]
Full text loading...
Author and Article Information
Figure data loading....