Novosphingobium panipatense sp. nov. and Novosphingobium mathurense sp. nov., from oil-contaminated soil, by S. K. Gupta, D. Lal and R. Lal
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology vol. 59, part 1, pp. 156 - 161
Supplementary Fig. S1. Transmission electron micrographs of negatively stained cells of strains SM16T (left) and SM117T (right). Strain SM117T shows a single polar flagellum. Bars, 1.0 µm.
Supplementary Fig. S2. Polar lipid profiles of strains SM16T (left) and SM117T (right) after two-dimensional TLC and detection with molybdatophosphoric acid. PE, Phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; SGL, sphingoglycolipid; PDE, phosphatidyldimethylethanolamine; PME, phosphatidylmonomethylethanolamine; PDE, phosphatidyldimethylethanolamine; PLY, unknown phospholipid; PGLY, unknown phosphoglycolipid; GLY, unknown glycolipid: P, unknown polar lipid.
Supplementary Table S1. DNA–DNA relatedness of strains SM16T and SM117T with phylogenetically closely related Novosphingobium type strains
Values are percentages expressed as means±SD of four replicates and were obtained in this study.
| Test strain | Probe |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 1. Strain SM16T | 100.0±2.9 | 7.3±0.1 | 3.9±0.1 | 9.0±0.2 |
| 2. Strain SM117T | 9.6±0.1 | 100.0±4.4 | 9.7±1.0 | 6.4±0.3 |
| 3. N. pentaromativorans DSM 17173T | 10.0±0.2 | 42.6±1.6 | 100.0±11.4 | 9.1±0.5 |
| 4. N. resinovorum DSM 7478T | 12.1±0.4 | 8.9±0.2 | 5.4±0.1 | 100.0±4.6 |