IJSEM IJSEM eTOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


IMMEDIATE OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Abstract
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Agricola
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58 (2008), 1976-1978; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.2008/006221-0
© 2008 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Corynebacterium ilicis is typified by ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144, Arthrobacter ilicis is typified by DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228 and the two are not homotypic synonyms, and clarification of the authorship of these two species. Opinion 87

Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

Correspondence
B. J. Tindall
bti{at}dsmz.de

ABSTRACT

The Judicial Commission rules that the name Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go is represented by the type strain ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144 and is reported to be a plant-pathogenic species. Arthrobacter ilicis is represented by the type strain DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228 and is not a homotypic synonym of Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961, and is reported not to be a plant pathogen. The authorship is to be cited as Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go and typification and the description of this species are to be found in Collins et al. (1981)Go [Collins, M. D., Jones, D. & Kroppenstedt, R. M. (1981). Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt I Orig C2, 318–323Go].

At its meetings in 2005 at the IUMS Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology Congress in San Francisco, the Judicial Commission of the International Committee for Systematics of Prokaryotes ruled that the name Arthrobacter ilicis is represented by the type strain DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228. The authorship is to be cited as Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go and the effective publication where this name is first published, typified and described is to be found in Collins et al. (1981)Go. The name Arthrobacter ilicis appeared on Validation List no. 9 (Collins et al., 1982Go). In dealing with typification of Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go, the type of Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go is affected and must also be dealt with by the Judicial Commission. The type of Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go is represented by the type strain ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144.

It is evident from a number of publications that the organisms represented by the strains ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144 and DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 (cited on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names; Skerman et al., 1980Go) =NCPPB 1228 are members of different taxa; although it was initially thought that DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228 were derived from a strain (CR2) that Mandel et al. (1961)Go considered to be pathogenic on American holly (Ilex opaca), this has proven not to be the case. Strains CR2 and Y-1 of Mandel studied by Dye & Kemp (1977)Go under the numbers CJ2 and CJ3 are clearly not members of the same taxon as CJ1 =NCPPB 1228 (=CR2). It is clear that DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228 does not exhibit one of the original diagnostic features of Corynebacterium ilicis, namely pathogenesis on American holly, and cannot represent this species. The Judicial Commission has therefore ruled that DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228 cannot serve as the type of the species Corynebacterium ilicis, but may serve as the type of a different taxon, Arthrobacter ilicis. Although this name is considered by Collins et al. (1981)Go to be a homotypic synonym of Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go, this is obviously not the case, since the strain studied is not an authentic representative of this taxon. The Judicial Commission therefore rules that the name Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go is to be typified by DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228 and that it is not a homotypic synonym of Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go. Reference to Mandel et al. 1961 in the author citation Arthrobacter ilicis (Mandel et al. 1961Go) Collins et al. 1982 is to be removed and any reference to Mandel et al. (1961)Go is not to be included in any future descriptions. The Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (Skerman et al., 1980Go, 1989Go) make reference to the publication of Dye & Kemp (1977)Go as the source of the description of Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go, and care must be taken in interpretation. Clearly, the strain listed as CJ1 (derived from NCPPB 1228) is not a member of the same taxon as CJ2 (=ICMP 2608) and CJ3 (=ICMP 2609). Based on later work, it would appear that data on strain CJ1 (=ICMP 2607) refer to Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go, whereas the results from strain CJ2 and CJ3 are ‘atypical’. Notes held in the International Collection of Phytopathogenic Bacteria (ICPB), now housed at the USDA-ARS Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, Fort Detrick, MD, USA, indicate that strain ICPB CI144 (=CJ2 =ICMP 2608) could reinfect holly, and obviously refer to the pathogen Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go. This strain was accessioned to the ICPB (then in Davis, CA, USA) in 1960. It was also noted that ICPB CI145 (=CJ3 =ICMP 2609) did not reinfect holly.

Further work has shown that the species Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go, represented by the type strain DSM 20138 =ATCC 14264 =NCPPB 1228, is not pathogenic for American holly and should not be listed as a plant-pathogenic species. In contrast, Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961, represented by the type strain ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144, is pathogenic for American holly and has also been shown to be a member of the species Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, where it is recognized as Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. ilicis (Dye & Kemp, 1977Go; Young et al., 2004Go). Although not covered by the Bacteriological Code, the strain ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144 may serve as the pathotype under the International Standards for Naming Pathovars of Phytopathogenic Bacteria (Young et al., 2001Go).

The following points should also be noted:

The work of Bousfield (1972)Go, Jones (1975)Go, Schleifer & Kandler (1972)Go and Keddie & Cure (1978Go; and relevant citations therein) refers to the species Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go. The work of Collins et al. (1981)Go draws heavily on these data and makes no reference to pathogenicity on American holly. The work of Lelliott (1966)Go makes no clear reference to the source of the strain, but the work was carried out in the Plant Pathology Laboratory, Harpenden, UK, where the National Collection of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria was housed at the time. According to their printed catalogue from 1977, Corynebacterium ilicis NCPPB 1228 had been accessed from the ATCC in 1962. By deduction, one may conclude that the work of Lelliott (1966)Go used NCPPB 1228, which is a strain of Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go. Reference to Mandel et al. (1961)Go and Starr et al. (1975)Go is inappropriate.

The work of Mandel et al. (1961)Go clearly mentions the pathogenicity of Corynebacterium ilicis on American holly. However, Dye & Kemp (1977)Go suggest that the description of strain CJ2 (=ICMP 2608), an authentic strain of Corynebacterium ilicis =Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. ilicis (and CJ3 =ICMP 2609), is atypical when compared with the description of Mandel et al. (1961)Go. The work of Starr et al. (1975)Go deals with the parent strain of strain CJ2, which is the type strain of Corynebacterium ilicis and pathotype of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. ilicis (ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144). The description of the species Arthrobacter ilicis by Keddie et al. (1986)Go also refers to data from two different taxa and should not be cited.

The work of Dye & Kemp (1977)Go includes work on both Arthrobacter ilicis (strain CJ1 =ICMP 2607) and Corynebacterium ilicis =Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. ilicis (strains CJ2 and CJ3). The latter are referred to as being ‘atypical’. The description on page 580 makes reference to the holotype, a strain that is clearly derived from the type of Arthrobacter ilicis. Based on the cited description (Dye & Kemp, 1977Go) in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (Skerman et al., 1980Go, 1989Go), only the data collected on strain CJ2 (ICMP 2608 =ICPB CI144) should be considered as contributing to the description of Corynebacterium ilicis Mandel et al. 1961Go. Strain ICPB CI145 (CJ3 =ICMP 2609) does not appear to be pathogenic, although in the study of Dye & Kemp (1977)Go it appears to be indistinguishable from CJ2 (ICMP 2608 =ICPB 2608). Reference to the description in Mandel et al. (1961)Go is probably best avoided, although this work is to be cited as the source of the name Corynebacterium ilicis.

The original Request for an Opinion (Young et al., 2004Go) suggests that NCPPB 1228 and ATCC 14264 were compared on the basis of their 16S rRNA gene sequences in the work of Collins et al. (1981)Go; this is incorrect. Furthermore, in the citation of the type strain of Arthrobacter ilicis Collins et al. 1982Go at the end of the Request for an Opinion, the strain number ICPB CI144 is incorrect as it does not represent the type of this species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank John M. Young of Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand, for correspondence prior to the meeting of the Judicial Commission and Norman Schaad of the USDA-ARS Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, Fort Detrick, MD, USA, for access to the original notes on ICPB CI144 and ICPB CI145.

REFERENCES

Bousfield, I. J. (1972). A taxonomic study of some coryneform bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 71, 441–455.[Medline]

Collins, M. D., Jones, D. & Kroppenstedt, R. M. (1981). Reclassification of Corynebacterium ilicis (Mandel, Guba and Litsky) in the genus Arthrobacter as Arthrobacter ilicis comb. nov. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt 1 Orig C2, 318–323.

Collins, M. D., Jones, D. & Kroppenstedt, R. M. (1982). Arthrobacter ilicis comb. nov. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 9. Int J Syst Bacteriol 32, 384–385.[Free Full Text]

Dye, D. W. & Kemp, W. J. (1977). A taxonomic study of plant pathogenic Corynebacterium species. N Z J Agric Res 20, 563–582.

Jones, D. (1975). A numerical taxonomic study of coryneform and related bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 87, 52–96.[Medline]

Keddie, R. M. & Cure, G. L. (1978). Cell wall composition of coryneform bacteria. In Coryneform Bacteria (Special Publication no. 1 of the Society for General Microbiology), pp. 47–83. Edited by I. J. Bousfield & A. G. Callely. London: Academic Press.

Keddie, R. M., Collins, M. D. & Jones, D. (1986). Genus Arthrobacter Conn and Dimmick 1947, 300AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 2, pp. 1288–1301. Edited by P. H. A. Sneath, N. S. Mair, M. E. Sharpe & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Lelliott, R. A. (1966). The plant pathogenic coryneform bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 29, 114–118.[CrossRef]

Mandel, M., Guba, E. F. & Litsky, W. (1961). The causal agent of bacterial blight of American holly. In Bacteriological Proceedings. Abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, p. 61. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Schleifer, K. H. & Kandler, O. (1972). Peptidoglycan type of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 36, 407–477.[Free Full Text]

Skerman, V. B. D., McGowan, V. & Sneath, P. H. A. (editors) 1980). Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30, 225–420.[Free Full Text]

Skerman, V. B. D., McGowan, V. & Sneath, P. H. A. (editors) 1989). Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (Amended Edition). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Starr, M. P., Mandel, M. & Murata, N. (1975). The phytopathogenic coryneform bacteria in the light of DNA base composition and DNA-DNA segmental homology. J Gen Appl Microbiol 21, 13–26.[CrossRef]

Young, J. M., Bull, C. T., De Boer, S. H., Firrao, G., Gardan, L., Saddler, G. S., Stead, D. E. & Takikawa, Y. (2001). Committee on the Taxonomy of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. International Standards for Naming Pathovars of Phytopathogenic Bacteria. http://www.isppweb.org/about_tppb_naming.asp

Young, J. M., Watson, D. R. W. & Dye, D. W. (2004). Reconsideration of Arthrobacter ilicis (Mandel et al. 1961) Collins et al. 1982 as a plant-pathogenic species. Proposal to emend the authority and description of the species. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 303–305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Abstract
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Agricola


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS