IJSEM Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ast, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ast, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ast, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, P. V.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57 (2007), 2073-2078; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.65153-0
© 2007 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Photobacterium kishitanii sp. nov., a luminous marine bacterium symbiotic with deep-sea fishes

Jennifer C. Ast1, Ilse Cleenwerck2, Katrien Engelbeen2, Henryk Urbanczyk1, Fabiano L. Thompson3, Paul De Vos2 and Paul V. Dunlap1

1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
2 Laboratory of Microbiology and BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Ghent University, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, Ghent 9000, Belgium
3 Department of Genetics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Ilha do Fundão, CEP 21944-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Correspondence
Jennifer C. Ast
jca{at}umich.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Six representatives of a luminous bacterium commonly found in association with deep, cold-dwelling marine fishes were isolated from the light organs and skin of different fish species. These bacteria were Gram-negative, catalase-positive, and weakly oxidase-positive or oxidase-negative. Morphologically, cells of these strains were coccoid or coccoid-rods, occurring singly or in pairs, and motile by means of polar flagellation. After growth on seawater-based agar medium at 22 °C for 18 h, colonies were small, round and white, with an intense cerulean blue luminescence. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity placed these bacteria in the genus Photobacterium. Phylogenetic analysis based on seven housekeeping gene sequences (16S rRNA gene, gapA, gyrB, pyrH, recA, rpoA and rpoD), seven gene sequences of the lux operon (luxC, luxD, luxA, luxB, luxF, luxE and luxG) and four gene sequences of the rib operon (ribE, ribB, ribH and ribA), resolved the six strains as members of the genus Photobacterium and as a clade distinct from other species of Photobacterium. These strains were most closely related to Photobacterium phosphoreum and Photobacterium iliopiscarium. DNA–DNA hybridization values between the designated type strain, Photobacterium kishitanii pjapo.1.1T, and P. phosphoreum LMG 4233T, P. iliopiscarium LMG 19543T and Photobacterium indicum LMG 22857T were 51, 43 and 19 %, respectively. In AFLP analysis, the six strains clustered together, forming a group distinct from other analysed species. The fatty acid C17 : 0 cyclo was present in these bacteria, but not in P. phosphoreum, P. iliopiscarium or P. indicum. A combination of biochemical tests (arginine dihydrolase and lysine decarboxylase) differentiates these strains from P. phosphoreum and P. indicum. The DNA G+C content of P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T is 40.2 %, and the genome size is approximately 4.2 Mbp, in the form of two circular chromosomes. These strains represent a novel species, for which the name Photobacterium kishitanii sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain, pjapo.1.1T (=ATCC BAA-1194T=LMG 23890T), is a luminous symbiont isolated from the light organ of the deep-water fish Physiculus japonicus.


Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified length polymorphisms; Mbp, mega base pairs

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for gene sequences reported in this paper are EF415487–EF415631 and EF441349.

Supplementary material is available with the online version of this paper.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Photobacterium (Gammaproteobacteria: Vibrionaceae) comprises at present 14 species with validly published names, many members of which are luminous and some of which enter into bioluminescent symbioses with marine animals (Dunlap & Kita-Tsukamoto, 2006Go; Dunlap et al., 2007Go). Photobacterium phosphoreum (Beijerinck, 1889Go), the type species of the genus Photobacterium, was thought to be the light-organ symbiont of deep-water fishes (Hastings & Nealson, 1981Go), although the type strain of this species was isolated from the surface of a non-luminous fish (Ast & Dunlap, 2005Go). Recent analyses showed that P. phosphoreum was not recovered from light organ symbiosis; instead, the light-organ symbionts of deep-sea fishes formed a clade distinct from P. phosphoreum, designated previously as Photobacterium kishitanii (Dunlap & Ast, 2005Go; Dunlap et al., 2007Go). P. kishitanii is closely related to P. phosphoreum and Photobacterium iliopiscarium, although based on phylogenetic analysis, the latter two species are more closely related to each other than either is to P. kishitanii (Ast & Dunlap, 2005Go). Here, we present comprehensive phylogenetic, genomic and phenotypic evidence that strains of P. kishitanii represent a novel species, within the genus Photobacterium, for which the name Photobacterium kishitanii sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is pjapo.1.1T (=ATCC BAA-1194T=LMG 23890T).

Six strains representing P. kishitanii sp. nov. were examined here (Table 1Go), three isolated from fish light-organs (Ast & Dunlap, 2005Go; Dunlap & Ast, 2005Go; Haygood et al., 1992Go) and three from enrichments of fish skin (Ast & Dunlap, 2005Go; Hendrie et al., 1970Go; Georgala, 1958Go; Reichelt & Baumann, 1973Go). To obtain DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis, genomic DNA was purified using a DNA extraction kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol for Gram-negative bacteria. Seven housekeeping genes (16S rRNA, gapA, gyrB, pyrH, recA, rpoA and rpoD) were amplified from the six strains and from eleven representative strains of the genus Photobacterium. In addition, the genes of two contiguous operons, the lux operon (luxC, luxD, luxA, luxB, luxF, luxE and luxG, the products of which are responsible for the luminescent phenotype) and the rib operon (ribE, ribB, ribH and ribA, the products of which are involved in riboflavin synthesis) were amplified from luminous strains, for a total of more than 17 kbp of sequence. See Supplementary Tables S1–S4 for PCR amplification profiles and primer sequences (available in IJSEM Online). Amplified products were purified by using a PCR clean-up kit (Millipore) and directly sequenced by using the University of Michigan Sequencing Core. Sequences for housekeeping, lux and rib genes were obtained for two strains of Vibrio fischeri to serve as outgroups. GenBank accession numbers for all DNA sequences, including those obtained previously, are listed in Supplementary Table S5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Source of the novel strains investigated in this study

LO, Light organ; skin, enrichment from fish skin.

 
To test the evolutionary relationships of these six strains to other species of the genus Photobacterium, phylogenetic analysis was performed on the concatenated dataset with the program PAUP* (Swofford, 2002Go) using the 18 genes listed above (see Supplementary Material for details of phylogenetic analysis). Support values were calculated using 5000 jackknife resampling replicates. The resulting most parsimonious phylogenetic hypothesis clearly demonstrates that the novel strains identified as P. kishitanii represent a lineage separate from other species of Photobacterium (Fig. 1Go), with robust resampling support. Within the genus Photobacterium, the representatives of P. kishitanii form a clade with the species P. phosphoreum and P. iliopiscarium.


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of Photobacterium including the six strains of P. kishitanii sp. nov. Parsimony analysis of the concatenated dataset comprising seven housekeeping gene sequences (16S rRNA, gapA, gyrB, pyrH, recA, rpoA and rpoD), seven gene sequences of the lux operon (luxC, luxD, luxA, luxB, luxF, luxE and luxG) and four gene sequences of the rib operon (ribE, ribB, ribH and ribA) resulted in the single most parsimonious hypothesis shown here (5018 informative characters, tree length=8540, ensemble consistency index=0.808, ensemble retention index=0.877). Inferred gaps were treated as informative data, and for taxa lacking lux and rib genes or operons, the missing genes were treated as missing data. Numbers at nodes are jackknife support values based on 5000 resampling replicates.

 
To test further the hypothesis that P. kishitanii is a separate species, several additional analyses were performed. For per cent identities among 16S rRNA gene sequences, sequences were aligned using direct optimization analysis (Wheeler, 1996Go; Wheeler et al., 2006Go), as implemented by the program POY (Wheeler et al., 2003Go). Direct optimization iteratively evaluates alignment in the context of phylogeny; it therefore produces a rigorously tested alignment, unlike single-pass multiple sequence alignment algorithms used by other alignment programs. Details of the POY analysis can be found in Supplementary Material. Identities of P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T to other species were 97.7 % to P. indicum LMG 22857T, 99.6 % to P. iliopiscarium LMG 19543T and 99.7 % to P. phosphoreum LMG 4233T. These values are within the range of per cent identities between other recognized species of Photobacterium; for example, the identity between P. indicum LMG 22857T and P. phosphoreum LMG 4233T is 97.9 %.

To characterize genomic features that distinguish the strains of P. kishitanii from other species of Photobacterium, we performed two tests of genomic similarity, DNA–DNA hybridization and amplified length fragment polymorphism (AFLP) analysis. For DNA–DNA hybridization, high molecular mass DNA was prepared by the method of Wilson (1987)Go with minor modifications (Cleenwerck et al., 2002Go). DNA quality and quantity were determined by measuring absorptions at 260, 280 and 234 nm. Only high quality DNA with A260/A280 and A234/A260 ratios of 1.8–2.0 and 0.40–0.60 was used. Hybridizations were performed using a modification (Goris et al., 1998Go; Cleenwerck et al., 2002Go) of the microplate method described by Ezaki et al. (1989)Go with a hybridization temperature of 37 °C. Reported values are the mean of a minimum of four hybridizations. The values for hybridization between strain P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T and other species of Photobacterium were 51 % to P. phosphoreum LMG 4233T, 43 % to P. iliopiscarium LMG 19543T and 19 % to P. indicum LMG 22857T. These values, which are below the current level that delimits separate species, demonstrates that strains of P. kishitanii are distinct from other species of Photobacterium.

For AFLP analysis, DNA was prepared as above, and template preparation, PCR reactions and PAGE were performed as described by Thompson et al. (2001)Go. Electrophoretic patterns were tracked and normalized using the GENESCAN 3.1 software (Applera). Normalized tables of peaks, containing fragments of 50–539 bp were transferred to the BioNumerics 4.5 software (Applied Maths) for numerical analysis. Patterns were clustered using the Dice coefficient and the UPGMA algorithm. A band position tolerance value of 0.3 % was allowed to compensate for misalignment of similarly sized bands due to technical imperfections. The profiles were compared with the profiles of other species of Vibrionaceae using the database at the BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection. The dendrogram of the AFLP profiles demonstrates that the strains of P. kishitanii cluster together and are clearly distinct from other analysed species of Photobacterium and Vibrio (Fig. 2Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Dendrogram of AFLP patterns of novel strains of P. kishitanii compared with other species of Photobacterium and Vibrio. The six strains of P. kishitanii (numbers 10–15) are in bold. Numbers represent the following strains: 1, Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae LMG 7892T; 2, V. fischeri LMG 4414T; 3, Vibrio harveyi LMG 4044T; 4, P. iliopiscarium LMG 19543T; 5, Photobacterium angustum LMG 8455T; 6, Photobacterium leiognathi LMG 4228T; 7, P. phosphoreum LMG 4233T; 8, Photobacterium profundum LMG 19446T; 9, Photobacterium rosenbergii LMG 22223T; 10, P. kishitanii sp. nov. Og61 (=LMG 23892); 11, P. kishitanii sp. nov. B-421 (=LMG 23893); 12, P. kishitanii sp. nov. NCIMB 844 (=LMG 23895); 13, P. kishitanii sp. nov. ckamo.1.1 (=LMG 23891); 14, P. kishitanii sp. nov. FS-8.1 (=LMG 23894); 15, P. kishitanii sp. nov. pjapo.1.1T (=LMG 23890T); 16, P. lipolyticum LMG 23071T.

 
For determination of whole-cell fatty acid content of strains of P. kishitanii compared with strains of P. phosphoreum, P. iliopiscarium and P. indicum, cells were grown for 24 h at 20 °C on plates of M12 (Marine agar; Difco) medium. Harvesting of cells conformed to the recommendations of the manufacturer of the MIDI identification system (Microbial Identification System) for P. indicum LMG 22857T. In the case of the strains of P. kishitanii, cells of all strains were harvested from two plates, and for P. phosphoreum LMG 4233T and P. iliopiscarium LMG 19543T, the complete growth on one plate was used to acquire a sufficient concentration of fatty acids for the analysis. Extraction and analysis were performed according the manufacturer's instructions. The overall profiles of the four tested species are similar (Supplementary Table S6), but strains of P. kishitanii differ by the presence of the fatty acid C17 : 0 cyclo, which is not present in strains of P. phosphoreum, P. iliopiscarium or P. indicum.

Phenotypic characterizations, e.g. cell morphology, response to Gram staining, motility, oxidase and catalase tests were performed using standard methods. Additional biochemical tests were performed using API 20E and API 20NE tests (bioMérieux). Cells for inoculation of the strips were grown for 24 h at 20 °C on M12 medium and results were visually interpreted according to the manufacturer's instructions. On the basis of the arginine dihydrolase test, novel strains of P. kishitanii can be differentiated from strains of P. phosphoreum, and the lysine decarboxylase test differentiates novel strains of P. kishitanii from strains of P. phosphoreum and P. indicum. However, no single biochemical trait or combination of traits distinguishes strains of P. kishitanii from strains of P. iliopiscarium. Complete phenotype data may be found in Supplementary Table S7.

To characterize further P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T, DNA base composition was determined by HPLC according to the method of Mesbah et al. (1989)Go. Non-methylated phage {lambda} was used as a reference. The DNA G+C content of P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T is 40.2 mol%, which is consistent with other species of Photobacterium (Baumann & Baumann, 1984Go).

To estimate genome size and chromosome composition, genomic DNA inserts were prepared according to Lucangeli et al. (2000)Go with modifications. DNA fragments of undigested inserts and inserts digested with NotI or I-CeuI enzyme (New England Biolabs) were separated by PFGE using standard conditions (see Supplementary Material). Based on the electrophoretic banding patterns, the P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T genome is approximately 4.2 Mbp, configured in two circular chromosomes of sizes about 2.8 and 1.4 Mbp (Fig. 3Go). Strains B-421, ckamo.1.1, FS-8.1 and NCIMB 844 have genome sizes ranging from 4.0 to 4.7 Mbp (data not shown). Similar analyses of the genomes of 27 additional strains of P. kishitanii (data not shown) revealed that genomes can range in size from 3.9 to 4.9 Mbp with an average of 4.2 Mbp; all analysed strains were found to have two circular chromosomes, as in other species of Vibrionaceae (Okada et al., 2005Go). The I-CeuI enzyme digestion resulted in eight fragments, suggesting that P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T has at least eight rrn loci (I-CeuI cuts most bacterial genomes only within rrn loci), a result consistent with the high rrn copy number in other species of Vibrionaceae (Klappenbach et al., 2001Go).


Figure 3
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. PFGE of P. kishitanii pjapo.1.1T genomic DNA. Sizes in kb are shown on the left of each picture. (a) Resolution of mid-sized, restriction enzyme digested genomic DNA. (b) Resolution of undigested genomic DNA and large-size, restriction enzyme digested fragments.

 
Culture collections currently hold many bacterial strains identified as P. phosphoreum. To test if any of these strains are in fact of P. kishitanii, we analysed them phylogenetically by using gene sequences of gyrB, recA and luxA. Gene sequences were aligned by inferred amino acid sequence and analysed with a heuristic parsimony search using the program TNT (Goloboff et al., 2005Go; analysis details can be found in Supplementary Material). These results indicate that the following strains should be reclassified as P. kishitanii sp. nov.: ATCC 35080, ATCC 35081, ATCC 35082, NCIMB 61, NCIMB 62, NCIMB 64, NCIMB 65, NCIMB 66, NCIMB 68, NCIMB 69, NCIMB 70, NCIMB 71, NCIMB 844, NCIMB 1276, NCIMB 1277, NCIMB 12838 and NCIMB 12839. The following strains were confirmed as belonging to P. phosphoreum: NCIMB 7, NCIMB 188, NCIMB 193, NCIMB 395, NCIMB 1275 and NCIMB 1279. In previous work (Ast & Dunlap, 2005Go), three other strains from NCIMB identified as belonging to the species P. phosphoreum were resolved as belonging to the species P. iliopiscarium (NCIMB 13476, NCIMB 14378 and NCIMB 13481). A phylogenetic tree showing the results from the analysis including all NCIMB and ATCC strains mentioned above is available as Supplementary Fig. S1. All of these strains that originated from fish light-organs are P. kishitanii sp. nov., and to date, no strain identified by these criteria as P. phosphoreum has been isolated from the light organ of a fish or a squid (Ast & Dunlap, 2005Go; Dunlap & Ast, 2005Go; Dunlap et al., 2007Go; this study). Therefore, in contrast to P. kishitanii sp. nov., which can be isolated from light organs of several deep, cold-dwelling fishes, strains of P. phosphoreum apparently do not occur as a bioluminescent symbiont of marine animals.

On the basis of these phylogenetic, genomic and taxonomic analyses, strains identified as P. kishitanii clearly represent a separate species of Photobacterium, for which the name Photobacterium kishitanii sp. nov. is proposed.

Description of Photobacterium kishitanii sp. nov.
Photobacterium kishitanii (ki.shi.tan'i.i. N.L. gen. n. kishitanii of Kishitani, to honour the deceased Japanese scientist Teijiro Kishitani, who first isolated luminous bacteria from the light organ of Physiculus japonicus). The following description is based on analyses of six strains (Table 1Go).

Cells are Gram-negative, coccoid or coccoid-rods, motile, occurring singly or in pairs, 0.9 µm in width by 1.2–3.0 µm in length. After 18 h, colonies grown on LSW-70 at 22 °C are small, round, white and strongly luminous. Catalase-positive. Oxidase-negative or weakly positive. Genome size of the type strain is approximately 4.2 Mbp (ranging within the six strains from 4.0 to 4.7 Mbp), consisting of two circular chromosomes. Cells produce the fatty acid C17 : 0 cyclo. Light-organ symbiont of many fishes, may also be found on the surfaces of fishes and in seawater. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 40.2 mol%.

The type strain, pjapo.1.1T (=ATCC BAA-1194T=LMG 23890T), was isolated in 1982 from the light organ of the deep-sea fish Physiculus japonicus.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Marjan De Wachter for performing the AFLP analyses, Margo Haygood for the gift of strain Og61 and Doug Georgala for information regarding the ecological origin of NCIMB 844. DNA sequencing was carried out by the staff of the University of Michigan Sequencing Core. This work was supported by grant DEB 0413441 from the National Science Foundation. F. L. T. acknowledges a young researcher grant FAPESP no. 04/00814-09. The BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection is supported by the Federal Public Planning Service – Science Policy, Belgium.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Ast, J. C. & Dunlap, P. V. (2005). Phylogenetic resolution and habitat specificity of members of the Photobacterium phosphoreum species group. Environ Microbiol 7, 1641–1654.[CrossRef][Medline]

Baumann, P. & Baumann, L. (1984). Section 5, Family II, Genus II. Photobacterium Beijerinck 1889. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, pp. 539–545. Edited by N. R. Krieg. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

Beijerinck, M. W. (1889). Photobacterium luminosum, a luminous bacterium from the North Sea (Le Photobacterium luminosum, Bactérie lumineuse de la Mer du Nord). Translated from Archives Néederlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, 23, 401–427 (M. A. Gradstein & C. D. Lichtfield, transl.) In Marine Microbiology, pp. 16–25. Edited by C. D. Lichtfield. Stroudsberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

Cleenwerck, I., Vandemeulebroecke, K., Janssens, D. & Swings, J. (2002). Re-examination of the genus Acetobacter, with descriptions of Acetobacter cerevisiae sp. nov. and Acetobacter malorum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1551–1588.[Abstract]

Dunlap, P. V. & Ast, J. C. (2005). Genomic and phylogenetic characterization of luminous bacteria symbiotic with the deep-sea fish Chlorophthalmus albatrossis (Aulopiformes: Chlorophthalmidae). Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 930–939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dunlap, P. V. & Kita-Tsukamoto, K. (2006). Luminous bacteria. In The Prokaryotes: a Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria, 3rd edn, vol. 3, pp. 863–892. Edited by M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K.-H. Schleifer & E. Stackebrandt. New York: Springer.

Dunlap, P. V., Ast, J. C., Kimura, S., Fukui, A., Yoshino, T. & Endo, H. (2007). Phylogenetic analysis of host–symbiont specificity and codivergence in bioluminescent symbiosis. Cladistics in press

Ezaki, T., Hashimoto, Y. & Yabuuchi, E. (1989). Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid–deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 224–229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Georgala, D. L. (1958). The bacterial flora of the skin of North Sea cod. J Gen Microbiol 18, 84–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C. (2005). TNT - Tree Analysis Using New Technology, version 1.0 (http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/TNT/). Instituto Superior de Entomología, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Tucamán, Argentina.

Goris, J., Suzuki, K., De Vos, P., Nakase, T. & Kersters, K. (1998). Evaluation of a microplate DNA-DNA hybridization method compared with the initial renaturation method. Can J Microbiol 44, 1148–1153.[CrossRef]

Hastings, J. W. & Nealson, K. H. (1981). The symbiotic luminous bacteria. In The Prokaryotes: a Handbook on Habitats, Isolation, and Identification of Bacteria, pp. 1332–1345. Edited by M. P. Starr, H. Stolp, H. G. Trüper, A. Balows & H. G. Schlegel. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Haygood, M. G., Distel, D. L. & Herring, P. J. (1992). Polymerase chain reaction and 16S rRNA gene sequences from the luminous bacterial symbionts of two deep-sea anglerfishes. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 72, 149–159.

Hendrie, M. S., Hodgkiss, W. & Shewan, J. M. (1970). The identification, taxonomy and classification of luminous bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 64, 151–169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Klappenbach, J. A., Saxman, P. R., Cole, J. R. & Schmidt, T. M. (2001). rrndb: the ribosomal RNA operon copy number database. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 181–184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lucangeli, C., Morabito, S., Caprioli, A., Achene, L., Busani, L., Mazzolioni, E., Fabris, A. & Macri, A. (2000). Molecular fingerprinting of strains of Yersinia ruckeri serovar O1 and Photobacterium damsela subsp. piscicida isolated in Italy. Vet Microbiol 76, 273–281.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mesbah, M., Premachandran, U. & Whitman, W. B. (1989). Precise measurements of G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 159–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Okada, K., Iida, T., Kita-Tsukamoto, K. & Honda, T. (2005). Vibrios commonly possess two chromosomes. J Bacteriol 187, 752–757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reichelt, J. L. & Baumann, P. (1973). Taxonomy of the marine, luminous bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol 94, 283–330.[CrossRef]

Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0B10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Thompson, F. L., Hoste, B., Vandemeulebroecke, K. & Swings, J. (2001). Genomic diversity amongst Vibrio isolates from different sources determined by fluorescent amplified length polymorphism. Syst Appl Microbiol 24, 520–538.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wheeler, W. C. (1996). Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics?. Cladistics 12, 1–9.[CrossRef]

Wheeler, W. C., Gladstein, D. & De Laet, J. (2003). POY: phylogeny reconstruction via optimization of DNA and other data, version 3.0.11 (http://research.amnh.org/scicomp/projects/poy.php). New York: American Museum of Natural History.

Wheeler, W. C., Aagesen, L., Arango, C. P., Faivovich, J., Grant, T., D'Haese, C., Janies, D., Smith, W. L., Varón, A. & Giribet, G. (2006). Dynamic Homology and Phylogenetic Systematics: a Unified Approach Using POY. New York: American Museum of Natural History.

Wilson, K. (1987). Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, pp. 2.4.1–2.4.5. Edited by F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith & K. Struhl. New York: Greene Publishing & Wiley-Interscience.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
S. Yoshizawa, M. Wada, K. Kita-Tsukamoto, A. Yokota, and K. Kogure
Photobacterium aquimaris sp. nov., a luminous marine bacterium isolated from seawater
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, June 1, 2009; 59(6): 1438 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
P. V. Dunlap, K. M. Davis, S. Tomiyama, M. Fujino, and A. Fukui
Developmental and Microbiological Analysis of the Inception of Bioluminescent Symbiosis in the Marine Fish Nuchequula nuchalis (Perciformes: Leiognathidae)
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 15, 2008; 74(24): 7471 - 7481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
D. M. Adin, K. L. Visick, and E. V. Stabb
Identification of a Cellobiose Utilization Gene Cluster with Cryptic {beta}-Galactosidase Activity in Vibrio fischeri
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2008; 74(13): 4059 - 4069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
H. Urbanczyk, J. C. Ast, A. J. Kaeding, J. D. Oliver, and P. V. Dunlap
Phylogenetic Analysis of the Incidence of lux Gene Horizontal Transfer in Vibrionaceae
J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2008; 190(10): 3494 - 3504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ast, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ast, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ast, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS