IJSEM Journal of Clinical Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, P.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57 (2007), 1881-1885; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.65104-0
© 2007 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Chryseobacterium luteum sp. nov., associated with the phyllosphere of grasses

Undine Behrendt1, Andreas Ulrich1, Cathrin Spröer2 and Peter Schumann2

1 Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Landscape Matter Dynamics, Eberswalder Straße 84, D-15374 Müncheberg, Germany
2 DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Inhoffenstraße 7B, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany

Correspondence
Undine Behrendt
ubehrendt{at}zalf.de


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Three isolates obtained from grass samples were investigated by means of a polyphasic taxonomic study and were shown to represent a novel species within the genus Chryseobacterium. Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences and phenotypic features indicated that the three isolates belonged to a single species. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the closest phylogenetic neighbours were Chryseobacterium shigense and Chryseobacterium vrystaatense, which formed a stable cluster with the isolates; this phylogeny was supported by a high bootstrap value and was obtained using different treeing methods. A DNA–DNA hybridization study with the closest neighbour, C. shigense DSM 17126T (98.3 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity), clearly demonstrated a separate species status for the grass isolate strain P 456/04T. Comparisons involving physiological properties and whole-cell fatty acid profiles confirmed this result at the phenotypic level. On the basis of these results, strain P 456/04T represents a novel species of the genus Chryseobacterium, for which the name Chryseobacterium luteum sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is P 456/04T (=DSM 18605T =LMG 23785T).


The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains P 456/04T (=DSM 18605T), P 528/18 and P 538/13 are AM489609, AM489610 and AM489611, respectively.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
The genus Chryseobacterium was proposed by Vandamme et al. (1994)Go and has a rapidly growing membership, as demonstrated by the multitude of novel species that have been proposed in recent years (de Beer et al., 2005Go, 2006Go; Kim et al., 2005Go; Shen et al., 2005Go; Shimomura et al., 2005Go; Young et al., 2005Go; Gallego et al., 2006Go; Park et al., 2006Go; Tai et al., 2006Go; Weon et al., 2006Go). Strains belonging to this genus occur in a variety of ecological niches. They have been recovered from soil, sewage, fresh water, marine sediments, clinical samples and various food sources. Furthermore, Chryseobacterium strains have been found associated with plants, either living epiphytically in plant phyllospheres and rhizospheres or endophytically inside several plant species (Bacon & Hinton, 2006Go; Beattie, 2006Go; Park et al., 2006Go).

In the context of a study on bacterial diversity associated with the phyllosphere of grasses, a culture-dependent approach (Behrendt, 2001Go) was used to isolate several bacterial strains, which were tentatively identified as Chryseobacterium sp. The aim of this study was to investigate three of these isolates by using a polyphasic classification strategy to determine their taxonomic position(s).

To investigate the structure of the community of heterotrophic bacteria, grass samples were taken from plots characterized by different levels of management intensity, as described by Behrendt (2001)Go. Grass material was homogenized in distilled water, using a Stomacher laboratory blender, and serial dilutions were plated on nutrient agar (SIFIN) supplemented with cycloheximide (0.4 g l–1), to ensure selectivity for bacterial growth. After incubation of the plates at 21 °C for 7 days, a number of representative strains were isolated to determine the community structure of the culturable heterotrophic bacteria. Strains P 456/04T, P 538/13 and P 528/18 were selected from a group of isolates displaying characteristics of the genus Chryseobacterium and were subjected to taxonomic investigations.

Sequencing of amplified 16S rRNA genes of the grass isolates was performed as described previously (Behrendt et al., 2003Go). For phylogenetic analysis, sequences of the grass isolates and of species of the genus Chryseobacterium (including those with validly published names and those whose names have not been validly published; Fig. 1Go) were aligned using the CLUSTAL_X program (Thompson et al., 1997Go). The phylogenetic trees were based on a 1396 nt alignment (Escherichia coli position 39–1445) and constructed using the neighbour-joining (Saitou & Nei, 1987Go) and maximum-likelihood (Felsenstein, 1981Go) algorithms (PHYLIP, version 3.6; Felsenstein, 1993Go). As shown in Fig. 1Go, the grass isolates formed a separate branch and clustered tightly together, demonstrating a very close relationship. 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values of 99.7 % between P 456/04T and P 528/18 and of 100 % between P 456/04T and P 538/13 supported their affiliation to the same species. The type strains of Chryseobacterium shigense and Chryseobacterium vrystaatense were phylogenetic neighbours of the grass isolates, showing sequence similarities of 98.3 and 97.3 %, respectively, with respect to strain P 456/04T. The clustering of the grass isolates with these two species was supported by a relatively high bootstrap value (97 %). Furthermore, this branching was also found with the maximum-likelihood algorithm, which demonstrated the relatively high stability of the cluster. Recent recommendations by Stackebrandt & Ebers (2006)Go have suggested a 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity threshold of 98.7–99.0 %, above which DNA–DNA reassociation experiments would be mandatory for confirming separate species status for a novel isolate. On the basis of this recommendation, the grass isolates could be clearly distinguished from their phylogenetic neighbours. Nevertheless, strain P 456/04T and its closest neighbour, C. shigense DSM 17126T, were subjected to a DNA–DNA hybridization study performed in 2x SSC plus 10 % DMSO at 61 °C according to Martin et al. (1997)Go. A reassociation value of 14 % (repetition, 10.6 %) was found. According to the recommendation of Wayne et al. (1987)Go for species delineation, separate species status for the grass isolate was clearly supported at the genomic level.


Figure 1
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree, based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, showing the relationships of the studied grass isolates with respect to known species of the genus Chryseobacterium. Filled circles indicate branches of the tree that were also produced using the maximum-likelihood method (Felsenstein, 1981Go). To estimate the root position of the tree, Flavobacterium hydatis DSM 2063T (GenBank accession no. AM230487) was used as an outgroup (not shown). Numbers at nodes indicate levels of bootstrap support (>50 %), based on 1000 resampled datasets. Bar, 0.01 changes per nucleotide position.

 
Morphological and physiological characterization of the grass isolates was performed as described by Behrendt et al. (1999)Go. All strains were cultivated on nutrient agar or in the corresponding broth at 21 °C. The presence of flexirubin-type pigments was tested as described by Bernardet et al. (2002)Go. An extensive investigation of oxidative acid production from carbohydrates was carried out using API 50 CH strips inoculated with a bacterial suspension in CHB/E Medium (bioMérieux). Reading of the results was not performed until 72 h, as the strains tested showed delayed reactions. In addition, physiological characteristics and enzyme activities were determined using API 20NE and API ZYM strips (bioMérieux). Contrary to the manufacturer's recommendation, all strips were incubated at 25 °C.

The morphological and physiological characteristics of the grass isolates are given in the species description. The characteristics of the isolates tested were compared and were found to be relatively consistent. Strain P 528/18 differed from the other two strains only in its inability to produce acid oxidatively from starch and to produce cystine arylamidase and {alpha}-chymotrypsin. These results supported the assumption, based on the results of the phylogenetic analysis, that the grass isolates belonged to one species.

A comparison of selected phenotypic features of the grass isolates with those of Chryseobacterium species (Table 1Go) revealed that the former differed in several respects. These differences, in combination, served to differentiate the isolates from recognized members of the genus Chryseobacterium.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Differential phenotypic characteristics of strains P 456/04T, P 528/18 and P 538/13 and Chryseobacterium species

Taxa: 1, strains P 456/04T, P 528/18 and P 538/13 (C. luteum sp. nov.); 2, C. balustinum (n=1); 3, C. caeni (n=1); 4, C. daecheongense (n=1); 5, C. defluvii (n=1); 6, C. formosense (n=1); 7, C. gleum (n=2); 8, C. hispanicum (n=1); 9, C. indologenes (n=7); 10, C. indoltheticum (n=1); 11, C. joostei (n=11); 12, C. piscium (n=4); 13, ‘C. proteolyticum’ (n=2); 14, C. scophthalmum (n=2); 15, C. shigense (n=1); 16, C. soldanellicola (n=1); 17, C. taeanense (n=1); 18, C. taichungense (n=1); 19, C. taiwanense (n=1); 20, C. vrystaatense (n=36); 21, C. wanjuense (n=1). Data are from Mudarris et al. (1994)Go, Yamaguchi & Yokoe (2000)Go, Hugo et al. (2003)Go, de Beer et al. (2005)Go, Shen et al. (2005)Go, Shimomura et al. (2005)Go, de Beer et al. (2006)Go, Gallego et al. (2006)Go, Park et al. (2006)Go, Tai et al. (2006)Go, Weon et al. (2006)Go, Quan et al. (2007)Go and this study. +, Positive; –, negative; W, weak reaction; d, different reactions; ND, no data available.

 
The determination of whole-cell fatty acid compositions also provides valuable taxonomic information at the genus and species level for the taxon Chryseobacterium (Bernardet et al., 2002Go). Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted from cells cultivated on tryptic soy agar for 1 day at 28 °C and analysed with the Sherlock Microbial Identification system (MIDI, version 4.5) as described by Behrendt et al. (1999)Go. As shown in Table 2Go, the cellular fatty acid profiles of the grass isolates were relatively similar, supporting the suggestion that they are affiliated to one species. Furthermore, the presence of large amounts of iso-C15 : 0, iso-C17 : 1{omega}9c and iso-C17 : 0 3-OH was typical of members of the genus Chryseobacterium. On the other hand, the presence of more than 1.0 % C17 : 0 2-OH served to distinguish the grass isolates from known species in the genus (with the exception of Chryseobacterium indoltheticum) (de Beer et al., 2006Go; Gallego et al., 2006Go; Park et al., 2006Go; Tai et al., 2006Go; Weon et al., 2006Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Cellular fatty acid compositions (%) of the grass isolates

ND, Not detected; tr, traces (<1 %). ECL, Equivalent chain-length (i.e. unknown fatty acid).

 
The results of the phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses clearly demonstrated that the grass isolates represent a novel species of the genus Chryseobacterium, for which the name Chryseobacterium luteum sp. nov. is proposed.

Description of Chryseobacterium luteum sp. nov.
Chryseobacterium luteum (lu'te.um. L. neut. adj. luteum orange-coloured).

Cells are non-spore-forming, non-motile single rods. Gram-negative with classical Gram-staining but produces a false Gram-positive reaction with the fast KOH test. Strictly aerobic. On nutrient agar, produces orange colonies that are smooth with regular margins. Flexirubin-type pigments are present. Optimal growth temperature is 21 °C. At 4 °C, slow growth can be observed, but known isolates are unable to grow at 37 °C. Grows on nutrient and trypticase soy agars but not on MacConkey agar. Catalase and oxidase activities are present. Arginine dihydrolase activity is absent. Gelatin, starch and aesculin are hydrolysed. Hydrolysis of casein is strain-dependent. Chitin, urea and DNA are not hydrolysed. D-Glucose, L-arabinose, D-mannose, D-mannitol, N-acetylglucosamine, maltose, potassium gluconate, capric acid, adipic acid, malic acid, trisodium citrate and phenylacetic acid are not assimilated in API 20NE test strips. With API 50 CH strips, acid is produced oxidatively from glycerol, L-arabinose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, amygdalin, arbutin, salicin, maltose, sucrose, trehalose, glycogen and gentiobiose. Acid is not produced from erythritol, D-arabinose, D- or L-xylose, D-adonitol, methyl beta-D-xylopyranoside, D-galactose, L-sorbose, L-rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, methyl {alpha}-D-mannopyranoside, methyl {alpha}-D-glucopyranoside, N-acetylglucosamine, D-cellobiose, D-lactose (bovine origin), D-melibiose, inulin, D-melezitose, D-raffinose, xylitol, D-turanose, D-lyxose, D-tagatose, D- or L-fucose, D- or L-arabitol, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-ketogluconate or potassium 5-ketogluconate. Acid production from starch is strain-dependent. With API ZYM strips, alkaline phosphatase, esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, trypsin, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, beta-galactosidase, {alpha}-glucosidase, beta-glucosidase and N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase activities are present. Esterase (C4), lipase (C14), {alpha}-galactosidase, beta-glucuronidase, {alpha}-mannosidase and {alpha}-fucosidase activities are absent. Cystine arylamidase and {alpha}-chymotrypsin activities are strain-dependent. The fatty acids largely comprise iso-C15 : 0 (37.7 %±2.8), iso-C17 : 1{omega}9c (17.9 %±2.0), iso-C17 : 0 3-OH (16.8 %±0.6), iso-C15 : 0 2-OH (8.0 %±1.2) and anteiso-C15 : 0 (4.7 %±0.9).

The type strain, P 456/04T (=DSM 18605T =LMG 23785T), was isolated from the phyllosphere of grasses in Paulinenaue, Germany.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We wish to thank Mrs B. Selch, Mrs S. Weinert (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research) and Mrs G. Pötter (DSMZ) for their excellent technical assistance.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Bacon, C. W. & Hinton, D. M. (2006). Bacterial endophytes: the endophytic niche, its occupants, and its utility. In Plant-Associated Bacteria, pp. 155–194. Edited by S. S. Gnanamanickam. Dordrecht: Springer.

Beattie, G. A. (2006). Plant-associated bacteria: survey, molecular phylogeny, genomics and recent advances. In Plant-Associated Bacteria, pp. 1–56. Edited by S. S. Gnanamanickam. Dordrecht: Springer.

Behrendt, U. (2001). Der Einfluß differenzierter Bewirtschaftungsintensität von Niedermoorgrünland auf die Entwicklung von Mikroorganismen-Gesellschaften in der Phyllosphäre von Gräsern. Müncheberg: Zentrum für Agrarlandschafts- und Landnutzungsforschung (ZALF) e.V. (in German).

Behrendt, U., Ulrich, A., Schumann, P., Erler, W., Burghardt, J. & Seyfarth, W. (1999). A taxonomic study of bacteria isolated from grasses: a proposed new species Pseudomonas graminis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 297–308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Behrendt, U., Ulrich, A. & Schumann, P. (2003). Fluorescent pseudomonads associated with the phyllosphere of grasses; Pseudomonas trivialis sp. nov., Pseudomonas poae sp. nov. and Pseudomonas congelans sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 1461–1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bernardet, J. F., Nakagawa, Y. & Holmes, B. (2002). Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1049–1070.[Abstract]

de Beer, H., Hugo, C. J., Jooste, P. J., Willems, A., Vancanneyt, M., Coenye, T. & Vandamme, P. A. R. (2005). Chryseobacterium vrystaatense sp. nov., isolated from raw chicken in a chicken-processing plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 2149–2153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de Beer, H., Hugo, C. J., Jooste, P. J., Vancanneyt, M., Coenye, T. & Vandamme, P. (2006). Chryseobacterium piscium sp. nov., isolated from fish of the South Atlantic Ocean off South Africa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 1317–1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Felsenstein, J. (1981). Evolutionary tree from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17, 368–376.[CrossRef][Medline]

Felsenstein, J. (1993). PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Gallego, V., Garcia, M. T. & Ventosa, A. (2006). Chryseobacterium hispanicum sp. nov., isolated from the drinking water distribution system of Sevilla, Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 1589–1592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hugo, C. J., Segers, P., Hoste, B., Vancanneyt, M. & Kersters, K. (2003). Chryseobacterium joostei sp. nov., isolated from the dairy environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 771–777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim, K. K., Bae, H.-S., Schumann, P. & Lee, S.-T. (2005). Chryseobacterium daecheongense sp. nov., isolated from freshwater lake sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 133–138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Martin, K., Schumann, P., Rainey, F. A., Schuetze, B. & Groth, I. (1997). Janibacter limosus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new actinomycete with meso-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 529–534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mudarris, M., Austin, B., Segers, P., Vancanneyt, M., Hoste, B. & Bernardet, J. F. (1994). Flavobacterium scophthalmum sp. nov., a pathogen of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 447–453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park, M. S., Jung, S. R., Lee, K. H., Lee, M.-S., Do, J. O., Kim, S. B. & Bae, K. S. (2006). Chryseobacterium soldanellicola sp. nov. and Chryseobacterium taeanense sp. nov., isolated from roots of sand-dune plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 433–438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Quan, Z.-X., Kim, K. K., Kim, M.-K., Jin, L. & Lee, S.-T. (2007). Chryseobacterium caeni sp. nov., isolated from bioreactor sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57, 141–145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425.[Abstract]

Shen, F.-T., Kämpfer, P., Young, C.-C., Lai, W.-A. & Arun, A. B. (2005). Chryseobacterium taichungense sp. nov., isolated from contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 1301–1304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shimomura, K., Kaji, S. & Hiraishi, A. (2005). Chryseobacterium shigense sp. nov., a yellow-pigmented, aerobic bacterium isolated from a lactic acid beverage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 1903–1906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stackebrandt, E. & Ebers, J. (2006). Taxonomic standards revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 11, 152–155.

Tai, C.-J., Kuo, H.-P., Lee, F.-L., Chen, H.-K., Yokota, A. & Lo, C.-C. (2006). Chryseobacterium taiwanense sp. nov., isolated from soil in Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 1771–1776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D. G. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 4876–4882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vandamme, P., Bernardet, J. F., Segers, P., Kersters, K. & Holmes, B. (1994). New perspectives in the classification of the flavobacteria: description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 827–831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wayne, L. G., Brenner, D. J., Colwell, R. R., Grimont, P. A. D., Kandler, O., Krichevsky, M. I., Moore, L. H., Moore, W. E. C., Murray, R. G. E. & other authors (1987). International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 463–464.[Free Full Text]

Weon, H.-Y., Kim, B.-Y., Yoo, S.-H., Kwon, S.-W., Cho, Y.-H., Go, S.-J. & Stackebrandt, E. (2006). Chryseobacterium wanjuense sp. nov., isolated from greenhouse soil in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 1501–1504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamaguchi, S. & Yokoe, M. (2000). A novel protein-deamidating enzyme from Chryseobacterium proteolyticum sp. nov., a newly isolated bacterium from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 3337–3343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Young, C.-C., Kämpfer, P., Shen, F.-T., Lai, W.-A. & Arun, A. B. (2005). Chryseobacterium formosense sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of Lactuca sativa L. (garden lettuce). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 423–426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
E. Hantsis-Zacharov, T. Shaked, Y. Senderovich, and M. Halpern
Chryseobacterium oranimense sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, proteolytic and lipolytic bacterium isolated from raw cow's milk
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, November 1, 2008; 58(11): 2635 - 2639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
U. Behrendt, A. Ulrich, and P. Schumann
Chryseobacterium gregarium sp. nov., isolated from decaying plant material
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, May 1, 2008; 58(5): 1069 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS