IJSEM Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gachhui, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gachhui, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gachhui, R.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57 (2007), 353-357; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.64638-0
© 2007 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Nitrogen-fixing and cellulose-producing Gluconacetobacter kombuchae sp. nov., isolated from Kombucha tea

Debasree Dutta and Ratan Gachhui

Department of Life Science & Biotechnology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India

Correspondence
Ratan Gachhui
ratangachhui{at}yahoo.com


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
A few members of the family Acetobacteraceae are cellulose-producers, while only six members fix nitrogen. Bacterial strain RG3T, isolated from Kombucha tea, displays both of these characteristics. A high bootstrap value in the 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis supported the position of this strain within the genus Gluconacetobacter, with Gluconacetobacter hansenii LMG 1527T as its nearest neighbour (99.1 % sequence similarity). It could utilize ethanol, fructose, arabinose, glycerol, sorbitol and mannitol, but not galactose or xylose, as sole sources of carbon. Single amino acids such as L-alanine, L-cysteine and L-threonine served as carbon and nitrogen sources for growth of strain RG3T. Strain RG3T produced cellulose in both nitrogen-free broth and enriched medium. The ubiquinone present was Q-10 and the DNA base composition was 55.8 mol% G+C. It exhibited low values of 5.2–27.77 % DNA–DNA relatedness to the type strains of related gluconacetobacters, which placed it within a separate taxon, for which the name Gluconacetobacter kombuchae sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain RG3T (=LMG 23726T=MTCC 6913T).


The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA and nifH gene sequences of strain RG3T are respectively AY688433 and DQ141200.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Endophytic bacteria colonize the internal tissues of the host plant for mutual benefit. The nitrogen-fixing endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus was found to be associated with sugar cane, pineapple, Cameroon grass, sweet potato, mango and banana (Muthukumarasamy et al., 2002Go), while Gluconacetobacter azotocaptans and Gluconacetobacter johannae inhabit coffee plants (Fuentes-Ramírez et al., 2001Go); these organisms might provide host plants with useful fixed nitrogen and growth stimulants (Lee et al., 2000Go; Muthukumarasamy et al., 2002Go). Based on the strikingly similar high-sugar and low-pH environments presented by the habitats of sugar cane and Kombucha tea (Blanc, 1996Go), we explored the bacterial flora of Kombucha tea and isolated a nitrogen-fixing strain, Acetobacter nitrogenifigens RG1T (Dutta & Gachhui, 2006Go), and another nitrogen-fixing and cellulose-producing strain, RG3T, belonging to the family Acetobacteraceae.

The family Acetobacteraceae has been divided into 10 genera: Acetobacter, Gluconacetobacter, Gluconobacter, Acidomonas (Yamada et al., 1997Go), Asaia (Yamada et al., 2000Go), Kozakia (Lisdiyanti et al., 2002Go), Saccharibacter (Jojima et al., 2004Go), Swaminathania (Loganathan & Nair, 2004Go), Neoasaia (Yukphan et al., 2005Go) and Granulibacter (Greenberg et al., 2006Go). Only six members of the family, G. diazotrophicus (Gillis et al., 1989Go), G. johannae (Fuentes-Ramírez et al., 2001Go), G. azotocaptans (Fuentes-Ramírez et al., 2001Go), Acetobacter peroxydans (Muthukumarasamy et al., 2005Go), Swaminathania salitolerans (Loganathan & Nair, 2004Go) and Acetobacter nitrogenifigens (Dutta & Gachhui, 2006Go), are known to fix nitrogen. The genus Gluconacetobacter comprises 15 species with validly published names at present, differentiated on the basis of DNA–DNA relatedness, phylogenetic relationships and morphological characteristics. Isolation of strain RG3T from Kombucha tea is the first instance of a strain within the family having both nitrogen-fixing and cellulose-producing activity. We present morphological, biochemical and genetic evidence that indicates that RG3T represents a novel nitrogen-fixing species within the genus Gluconacetobacter.

Kombucha tea is a fermented tea that contains an association of yeast and bacteria. A jelly-like membrane floats in the nutrient solution of tea and sugar exposed to oxygen. At the right temperature, it multiplies continuously. It first spreads over the entire surface of the tea, and then thickens. Kombucha tea was subcultured every 7–10 days by mixing 10 % of old soup with 10 % sucrose dissolved in brewed black tea. After teasing the mat apart in the soup, aliquots of Kombucha mat suspension were spread on LGI agar plates (0.06 % KH2PO4, 0.02 % K2HPO4, 0.02 % MgSO4, 0.002 % CaCl2, 0.001 % FeCl3, 0.0002 % Na2MoO4, 10 % sucrose, pH 4.5; Cavalcante & Döbereiner, 1988Go) containing 150 mg cycloheximide l–1 (Jimenez-Salgado et al., 1997Go) and 150 mg nystatin l–1. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Repeated streaking on LGI plates, which contain no combined nitrogen, purified the bacterial isolate. Gas-tight vials of LGI medium inoculated with bacteria (under a microaerophilic environment, without shaking) were assayed for acetylene reduction activity (Stal, 1988Go). Nitrogenase-positive isolates were selected for further characterization. Strain RG3T, a nitrogen-fixing bacterial strain that exhibited cellulose-producing ability even in nitrogen-free LGI broth, was isolated.

Strain RG3T produced cellulose when grown in HS medium (Hestrin & Schramm, 1954Go) under stationary as well as shaking culture conditions at 30 °C after incubation for 3 days. The cellulosic character of the pellicle was confirmed by boiling the pellicles with a dilute NaOH solution (Forng et al., 1989Go; Navarro & Komagata, 1999Go). The polymer was a simple carbohydrate in nature, as indicated by the greenish-blue colour of the supernatant with o-toluidine. In acid-hydrolysed bacterial pellicle samples, the amount of reducing sugars released was found to be comparable to the amount of glucose residues estimated by using glucose oxidase. Thus, the pellicle had repetitive glucose units. Liberation of glucose units upon enzymic digestion of the pellicle with cellulase confirmed it to be composed of cellulose.

Reference strains (Gluconacetobacter hansenii JCM 11196T, a gift of Y. Nakagawa and Y. Yamada, Gluconacetobacter intermedius LMG 18909T, Gluconacetobacter europeaus LMG 1518T, Gluconacetobacter oboediens LMG 18849T and Gluconacetobacter swingsii LMG 22125T, from the BCCM/LMG, and Gluconacetobacter xylinus JCM 7644T from the JCM) were grown in different media according to the instructions of the culture collections. Colony morphology was examined on LGI agar plates and on potato agar plates containing 10 % sucrose. Various phenotypic and morphological characters were tested using standard techniques described previously (Franke et al., 1999Go; Schüller et al., 2000Go; Dellaglio et al., 2005Go; Fuentes-Ramírez et al., 2001Go). Isoprenoid quinones of the isolate were extracted with chloroform/methanol (2 : 1, v/v) and purified by TLC on silica gel 60 F254 plates (20x20 cm; Merck) by using benzene as the developing solvent. Quinones recovered from the TLC plates were dissolved in acetone and analysed by HPLC (Lu et al., 1999Go). The HPLC system was equipped with a reversed-phase column [Luna 5U C18 (2) 100A, 250x4.6 mm; Phenomenex] and a mixture of methanol and isopropanol (2 : 1, v/v) was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 ml min–1. Types of quinone were identified by absorption at 275 nm and compared with coenzyme Q-9 and coenzyme Q-10 standards from Sigma-Aldrich. Ubiquinone Q-10 was present in strain RG3T, in agreement with previous observations of the presence of this ubiquinone type in the genus Gluconacetobacter (Cleenwerck et al., 2002Go).

A 1442 bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR with bacteria-specific primers fD1 and rD1 (Weisburg et al., 1991Go) using Taq polymerase and genomic DNA from RG3T as the template. The nucleotide sequence showed the following levels of similarity to sequences from strains of the genus Gluconacetobacter after performing similarity searches with FASTA (ungapped): 99.1 % with G. hansenii LMG 1527T, 99.0 % with G. entanii LTH 4560T, 98.6 % with G. rhaeticus DST GL02T, 98.5 % with G. swingsii DST GL01T, 98.3 % with G. xylinus JCM 7644T and G. europeaus JK2, 98.2 % with G. saccharivorans LMG 1582T, 98.1 % with G. oboediens LTH 2460T, G. intermedius TF2T and G. nataicola LMG 1536T, 96.7 % with G. diazotrophicus LMG 7603T, 96.6 % with G. azotocaptans CFN-Ca54T, 96.5 % with G. johannae CFN-Cf55T and G. liquefaciens LMG 1382T and 96.4 % with G. sacchari IF 2-6. The phylogenetic tree was deduced using MEGA version 3.1 (Kumar et al., 2004Go) software after multiple alignment with 16S rRNA gene sequences of other acetic acid bacteria with CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al., 1994Go). Distances (distance options according to the Kimura two-parameter model) and clustering with the neighbour-joining method were determined by using bootstrap values (Felsenstein, 1985Go) based on 100 replications. As evident from the tree (Fig. 1Go), the species of this genus are subgrouped phylogenetically into two clusters, comprising nitrogen-fixers such as G. diazotrophicus and cellulose-producers such as G. xylinus, G. swingsii, G. rhaeticus and G. nataicola. The novel strain RG3T, which exhibits both these characteristics, clustered with the ‘cellulose-producing’ group, along the subbranch formed by G. hansenii and G. entanii.


Figure 1
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of acetic acid bacteria including strain RG3T and related members of the family Acetobacteraceae. Numerals at nodes indicate bootstrap values derived from 100 replications. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Bar, 2 substitutions per 100 nucleotides.

 
Strain RG3T differed biochemically from the phylogenetically closely related species of the genus Gluconacetobacter (Table 1Go). It could be differentiated from G. hansenii and G. entanii, its phylogenetically closest neighbours, in utilizing sorbitol as a sole source of carbon. Additionally, RG3T could be differentiated from G. hansenii by the non-utilization of ethanol, mannitol and sucrose as carbon sources and from G. entanii by growth in the absence of acetic acid and utilization of D-mannitol as a carbon source. The major difference between RG3T and the related ‘cellulose-producing’ gluconacetobacters is the absence of nitrogen-fixing behaviour in the remaining species. Of the genes responsible for nitrogen fixation, the structural genes nifHDK of the nitrogenase enzyme complex are the most important. A 536 bp region encoding dinitrogenase reductase, nifH, was amplified from RG3T using degenerate primers 19F and 407R (Franke et al., 1998Go) and sequenced, confirming the presence of the nifH gene in RG3T.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Differential characteristics between strain RG3T and closely related species of the genus Gluconacetobacter

Strains/species: 1, strain RG3T (data from this study); 2, G. hansenii (data from Gosselé et al., 1983Go; Navarro et al., 1999Go); 3, G. intermedius LMG 18909T (Boesch et al., 1998Go); 4, G. europeaus; 5, G. oboediens LMG 18849T; 6, G. xylinus (data in columns 4–6 from Sokollek et al., 1998Go); 7, G. swingsii LMG 22125T (Dellaglio et al., 2005Go); 8, G. entanii LTH 4560T (Schüller et al., 2000Go); 9, G. rhaeticus LMG 22126T (Dellaglio et al., 2005Go); 10, G. nataicola LMG 1536T; 11, G. saccharivorans LMG 1582T (data in columns 10 and 11 from Lisdiyanti et al., 2006Go). +, Positive; –, negative; W, weak; V, variable; ND, not determined; NR, not reported.

 
To determine the genomic relatedness of the new isolate, dot-blot hybridization experiments were carried out with DIG-labelled DNA as described previously (Labrenz et al., 2000Go) using the detection kit from Roche Applied Sciences following the manufacturer's instructions. Colorimetric quantification of dot intensities was done using the Molecular Analyst software (Bio-Rad) by determining mean pixel densities in circles of equal size. The genomic DNA probe was prepared from strain RG3T; digested with EcoRI and separated on a 0.7 % agarose gel. Total DNA digests were transferred from gels to nylon membrane by Southern blotting. Hybridization was performed at 75 °C for 16 h and the membrane was washed under high-stringency conditions (twice with 2x SSC/0.1 % SDS at room temperature for 10 min, once with 0.1x SSC/0.1 % SDS at 75 °C for 15 min). Low levels of genomic DNA relatedness (DNA–DNA hybridization values of less than 30 %) were observed between strain RG3T and its phylogenetically closest relatives; DNA–DNA relatedness values of 24.8 % (with G. hansenii JCM 7643T), 21.8 % (G. swingsii LMG 22125T), 27.7 % (G. xylinus JCM 7644T), 24.6 % (G. europeaus LMG 1518T), 5.2 % (G. oboediens LMG 18849T) and 23.4 % (G. intermedius LMG 18909T) were obtained.

The limitations of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the differentiation of closely related species have been documented (Fox et al., 1992Go), but a DNA–DNA reassociation level below 70 % indicates a distinct species (Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994Go). Although the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity levels were greater than 97 %, low levels (below 30 %) of DNA relatedness were found among the closely related Gluconacetobacter species studied. In view of the low physiological, biochemical, phylogenetic and genetic similarities among members of the genus Gluconacetobacter, we recommend that strain RG3T should be assigned to a novel species of the genus Gluconacetobacter. We propose the name Gluconacetobacter kombuchae sp. nov. for strain RG3T isolated from Kombucha tea.

Description of Gluconacetobacter kombuchae sp. nov.
Gluconacetobacter kombuchae (kom.bu'chae. N.L. gen. fem. n. kombuchae from Kombucha, a kind of fermented tea).

Cells are straight rods, approximately 2.0–3.0 µm long and 0.1–0.2 µm wide, and occur singly or in bunches. Gram-negative, motile with polar flagellation, catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. Growth occurs on nitrogen-free LGI plates at 30 and 37 °C and in LGI broth under microaerophilic conditions with formation of a cellulosic pellicle on the surface. Colonies grown on LGI plates are smooth, round, dull, dry, white and opaque, 0.5–1.0 mm in diameter after incubation for 5 days. Dark-yellow colonies are formed on LGI agar supplemented with 0.001 % bromothymol blue. Colonies on potato agar are light brown after 5 days of incubation, but the intensity increases after 10 days. The type strain is aerobic and fixes atmospheric nitrogen microaerobically. It oxidizes ethanol to acetic acid, turning EYC or GYC opaque plates transparent, and overoxidizes acetate and lactate to CO2 and water. L-Alanine supports growth, as well as the formation of a pellicle, as the sole source of carbon and nitrogen in LGI broth. Can utilize the single amino acids L-cysteine and L-threonine as sole sources of carbon and nitrogen but not L-phenylalanine. Butanol (0.1 %) can not support growth in nitrogen-free medium. In the absence of yeast extract, the type strain can utilize different carbon sources such as D-arabinose, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol and glycerol, but not D-galactose or D-xylose, and can grow on 30 % sucrose and 30 % glucose. Formation of a cellulosic pellicle is prevalent in the presence of almost all the general carbon sources used except sorbitol and gluconate. Can not utilize D-cellobiose, maltose or lactose in LGI medium for growth. The ubiquinone present is of the type Q-10 and the DNA G+C content of the type strain is 55.8 mol%.

The type strain is strain RG3T (=LMG 23726T=MTCC 6913T), isolated from Kombucha tea.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Dr Yasuyoshi Nakagawa and Dr Yuzo Yamada for promptly sending us G. hansenii JCM 1527T as a gift. This work was partially supported from funding agencies of the Government of India: CSIR (no. 38/1097/04/EMR-II) and DBT (no. BT/PR5111/BCE/08/340/2004). Financial support was also received by D. D. and R. G. from Jadavpur University.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Blanc, P. J. (1996). Characterization of the tea fungus metabolites. Biotechnol Lett 18, 139–142.

Boesch, C., Trcek, J., Sievers, M. & Teuber, M. (1998). Acetobacter intermedius sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 21, 220–229.[Medline]

Cavalcante, V. & Döbereiner, J. (1988). A new acid tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with the sugarcane. Plant Soil 108, 23–31.

Cleenwerck, I., Vandemeulebroecke, K., Janssens, D. & Swings, J. (2002). Re-examination of the genus Acetobacter, with descriptions of Acetobacter cerevisiae sp. nov. and Acetobacter malorum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1551–1558.[Abstract]

Dellaglio, F., Cleenwerck, I., Felis, G. E., Engelbeen, K., Janssens, D. & Marzotto, M. (2005). Description of Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. nov. and Gluconacetobacter rhaeticus sp. nov., isolated from Italian apple fruit. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 2365–2370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dutta, D. & Gachhui, R. (2006). Novel nitrogen-fixing Acetobacter nitrogenifigens sp. nov., isolated from Kombucha tea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 1899–1903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.[CrossRef]

Forng, E. R., Anderson, S. M. & Cannon, R. E. (1989). Synthetic medium for Acetobacter xylinum that can be used for isolation of auxotrophic mutants and study of cellulose biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 55, 1317–1319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fox, G. E., Wisotzkey, J. D. & Jurtshuk, P., Jr (1992). How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42, 166–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Franke, I. H., Fegan, M., Hayward, A. C. & Sly, L. I. (1998). Nucleotide sequence of the nifH gene coding for nitrogen reductase in the acetic acid bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus. Lett Appl Microbiol 26, 12–16.[CrossRef][Medline]

Franke, I. H., Fegan, M., Hayward, A. C., Leonard, G., Stackebrandt, E. & Sly, L. I. (1999). Description of Gluconacetobacter sacchari sp. nov., a new species of acetic acid bacterium isolated from the leaf sheath of sugar cane and from the pink sugar-cane mealy bug. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 1681–1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fuentes-Ramírez, L. E., Bustillos-Cristales, R., Tapia-Hernandez, A., Jiménez-Salgado, T., Wang, E. T., Martínez-Romero, E. & Caballero-Mellado, J. (2001). Novel nitrogen-fixing acetic acid bacteria, Gluconacetobacter johannae sp. nov. and Gluconacetobacter azotocaptans sp. nov., associated with coffee plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1305–1314.[Abstract]

Gillis, M., Kersters, K., Hoste, B., Janssens, D., Kroppenstedt, R. M., Stephan, M. P., Teixeria, K. R. S., Döbereiner, J. & De Ley, J. (1989). Acetobacter diazotrophicus sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing acetic bacterium associated with sugarcane. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 361–364.

Gosselé, F., Swings, J., Kesters, K., Pauwels, P. & De Ley, J. (1983). Numerical analysis of phenotypic features and protein gel electropherograms of a wide variety of Acetobacter strains. Proposal for the improvement of the taxonomy of the genus Acetobacter Beijerinck 1898. Syst Appl Microbiol 4, 338–368.

Greenberg, D. E., Porcella, S. F., Stock, F., Wong, A., Conville, P. S., Murray, P. R., Holland, S. M. & Zelazny, A. M. (2006). Granulibacter bethesdensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a distinctive pathogenic acetic acid bacterium in the family Acetobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 2609–2616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hestrin, S. & Schramm, M. (1954). Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. Biochem J 58, 345–352.[Medline]

Jimenez-Salgado, T., Fuentes-Ramírez, L. E., Tapia-Hernandez, A., Mascarúa-Esparza, M. A., Martínez-Romero, E. & Caballero-Mellado, J. (1997). Coffea arabica L., a new host plant for Acetobacter diazotrophicus, and isolation of other nitrogen-fixing acetobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 3676–3683.[Abstract]

Jojima, Y., Mihara, Y., Suzuki, S., Yokozeki, K., Yamanaka, S. & Fudou, R. (2004). Saccharibacter floricola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel osmophilic acetic acid bacterium isolated from pollen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 2263–2267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar, S., Tamura, K. & Nei, M. (2004). MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5, 150–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Labrenz, M., Tindall, B. J., Lawson, P. A., Collins, M. D., Schumann, P. & Hirsch, P. (2000). Staleya guttiformis gen. nov., sp. nov., and Sulfitobacter brevis sp. nov., {alpha}-3-Proteobacteria from hypersaline, heliothermal and meromictic Antarctic Ekho Lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 303–313.[Abstract]

Lee, S., Sevilla, M., Meletzus, D., Gunapala, N. & Kennedy, C. (2000). Characterization of nitrogen fixation genes and plant-growth promoting properties in Acetobacter diazotrophicus, an endophyte of sugarcane. In Plant–Microbe Interactions, vol. 5, pp. 196–204. Edited by G. Stacey & N. T. Keen. St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society.

Lisdiyanti, P., Kawasaki, H., Widyastuti, Y., Saono, S., Seki, T., Yamada, Y., Uchimura, T. & Komagata, K. (2002). Kozakia baliensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel acetic acid bacterium in the {alpha}-Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 813–818.[Abstract]

Lisdiyanti, P., Navarro, R. R., Uchimura, T. & Komagata, K. (2006). Reclassification of Gluconacetobacter hansenii strains and proposals of Gluconacetobacter saccharivorans sp. nov. and Gluconacetobacter nataicola sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 2101–2111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Loganathan, P. & Nair, S. (2004). Swaminathania salitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a salt-tolerant, nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing bacterium from wild rice (Porteresia coarctata Tateoka). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1185–1190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lu, S.-F., Lee, F.-L. & Chen, H.-K. (1999). A thermotolerant and high acetic-acid producing bacterium Acetobacter sp. 114-2. J Appl Microbiol 86, 55–62.[CrossRef]

Muthukumarasamy, R., Revathi, G., Seshadri, S. & Lakshminarsimhan, C. (2002). Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (syn. Acetobacter diazotrophicus), a promising diazotrophic endophyte in tropics. Curr Sci 83, 137–145.

Muthukumarasamy, R., Cleenwerck, I., Revathi, G., Vadivelu, M., Janssens, D., Hoste, B., Gum, K. U., Park, K. D., Son, C. Y. & other authors (2005). Natural association of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and diazotrophic Acetobacter peroxydans with wetland rice. Syst Appl Microbiol 28, 277–286.[CrossRef][Medline]

Navarro, R. R. & Komagata, K. (1999). Differentiation of Gluconacetobacter liquefaciens and Gluconacetobacter xylinus on the basis of DNA base composition, DNA relatedness, and oxidation products from glucose. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45, 7–15.

Navarro, R. R., Uchimura, T. & Komagata, K. (1999). Taxonomic heterogeneity of strains comprising Gluconacetobacter hansenii. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45, 295–300.

Schüller, G., Hertel, C. & Hammes, W. P. (2000). Gluconacetobacter entanii sp. nov., isolated from submerged high-acid industrial vinegar fermentations. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 2013–2020.[Abstract]

Sokollek, S. J., Hertel, C. & Hammes, W. P. (1998). Description of Acetobacter oboediens sp. nov. and Acetobacter pomorum sp. nov., two new species isolated from industrial vinegar fermentations. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 935–940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. (1994). Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 846–849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stal, L. J. (1988). Nitrogen fixation in cyanobacterial mats. Methods Enzymol 167, 475–484.

Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A. & Lane, D. J. (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173, 697–703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada, Y., Hoshino, K. & Ishikawa, T. (1997). The phylogeny of acetic acid bacteria based on the partial sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA: the elevation of the subgenus Gluconacetobacter to the generic level. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 61, 1244–1251.[Medline]

Yamada, Y., Katsura, K., Kawasaki, H., Widyastuti, Y., Saono, S., Seki, T., Uchimura, T. & Komagata, K. (2000). Asaia bogorensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an unusual acetic acid bacterium in the {alpha}-Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 823–829.[Abstract]

Yukphan, P., Malimas, T., Potacharoen, W., Tanasupawat, S., Tanticharoen, M. & Yamada, Y. (2005). Neoasaia chiangmaiensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel osmotolerant acetic acid bacterium in the alpha-Proteobacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol 51, 301–311.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
I. Cleenwerck, M. De Wachter, A. Gonzalez, L. De Vuyst, and P. De Vos
Differentiation of species of the family Acetobacteraceae by AFLP DNA fingerprinting: Gluconacetobacter kombuchae is a later heterotypic synonym of Gluconacetobacter hansenii
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, July 1, 2009; 59(7): 1771 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gachhui, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gachhui, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gachhui, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS