IJSEM Applied and Environmental Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lau, K. W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lau, K. W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lau, K. W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57 (2007), 2665-2669; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.65156-0
© 2007 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Fangia hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel gammaproteobacterium of the order Thiotrichales isolated from coastal seawater of Hong Kong

Ken W. K. Lau1, Jianping Ren1, Ming-Chiu Fung2, Patrick C. Y. Woo3, Kwok-Yung Yuen3, Kelvin K. M. Chan2, Pei-Yuan Qian1, Po-Keung Wong2 and Madeline Wu1

1 Department of Biology, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Department of Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, China
3 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital Compound, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China

Correspondence
Ken W. K. Lau
sslwk{at}cuhk.edu.hk


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
A Gram-negative, coccobacillus-shaped, aerobic bacterium, designated strain UST040201-002T, was isolated in February 2004 from seawater at the outlet of a sandfilter in Port Shelter, Hong Kong SAR, China. This strain possessed ubiquinone-8; its 16S rRNA gene sequence shared only 91 % similarity with the sequence from Caedibacter taeniospiralis and 89–90 % similarity with sequences from Francisella tularensis, Francisella novicida, Francisella philomiragia and Wolbachia persica. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that the strain formed a distinct clade with C. taeniospiralis. This subcluster formed a tight coherent group with members of the family Francisellaceae and W. persica. Combined phylogenetic and physiological data suggest that strain UST040201-002T represents a novel genus and species within the order Thiotrichales. The name Fangia hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed; the type strain is UST040201-002T (=JCM 14605T=NRRL B-41860T).


The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of UST040201-002T is AB176554.

Photomicrographs of strain UST040201-002T are available as a supplementary figure with the online version of this paper.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
During a study of the diversity of marine bacteria in coastal seawater of Hong Kong, a pale-yellow-pigmented bacterium, UST040201-002T, was isolated and analysed using a polyphasic taxonomic approach.

Seawater was sampled in February 2004 from the outlet of a tank storing sand-filtered seawater that was pumped from a depth of 5 m adjacent to the Coastal Marine Laboratory of Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Aliquots of 100 µl were spread onto YPS-SW agar (Lau et al., 2005Go) and incubated at 30 °C for 3 days. A pale yellow colony was selected and purified by repeated restreaking on YPS-SW agar. It was cultivated in marine broth 2216 (MB) and stored in MB supplemented with 50 % (v/v) glycerol at –80 °C.

Colony morphology was observed on YP-SW (YPS-SW without starch) agar plates that had been incubated at 30 °C for 3 days. Cell morphology was examined using a Zeiss MC100 Spot microscope at 1000xmagnification. Cell motility was determined in motility agar [0.5 % marine agar (MA) with 0.005 % 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride]. Gram-reaction was assessed according to Collins et al. (1989)Go. Growth was evaluated at various temperatures (4, 16, 20, 25, 30, 33, 37, 40 and 42 °C) in YP-SW medium (Lau et al., 2005Go). Growth at various pH values (3.0–9.0 in single unit steps) was evaluated in artificial seawater (ASW; Lewin & Lounsbery, 1969Go) containing 0.1 % yeast extract and buffered with 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 3.0–4.0), 10 mM MES (pH 5.0–6.0) or 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.0–9.0). pH values of the media were measured before and after autoclaving and only slight changes of 0.0–0.2 units were observed. Salinity requirements were determined in YP-SW prepared with 0, 5, 15, 20, 40, 75 or 100 % filtered seawater. Salt tolerance was tested in ASW containing 0.4 % yeast extract plus 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7.5, 10 or 15 % (w/v) NaCl. NaCl and KCl requirements were tested in a medium containing 0.1 % yeast extract supplemented with NaCl or KCl at 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 or 1.0 %. The requirement for magnesium ions was tested in ASW with 0.2 % yeast extract, with magnesium sulfate replaced by equimolar levels of potassium sulfate. Anaerobic growth was examined in the Oxoid anaerobic system on YP-SW agar supplemented with 0.1 % NaNO3, 0.1 % glucose or 0.1 % meat extract. Acid production from glucose, sucrose, mannose, maltose and lactose was determined in Leifson's modified O/F medium with 0.1 % cysteine-HCl (Smibert & Krieg, 1994Go). Carbohydrate assimilation was determined with API 50 CH strips using ASW supplemented with 0.05 % yeast extract for 2 weeks at 30 °C. Fermentation of (+)-D-glucose, (–)-D-mannitol and sucrose, and hydrolysis of chitin and Tweens 20, 40, 60 and 80 were carried out according to Baumann & Baumann (1981)Go. Catalase, oxidase, lecithinase (observed after 2 weeks) and nitrate reductase activities, indole production, H2S generation from cysteine or thiosulfate, and hydrolysis of casein, cellulose, starch and gelatin were performed according to Smibert & Krieg (1994)Go. DNA hydrolysis was performed according to Lau et al. (2005)Go. Haemolytic activity was investigated using defibrinated rabbit blood (5 %, v/v) prepared with blood agar base (BBL) dissolved in filtered seawater. Degradation of dead yeast cells was tested on VY/2 agar (Reichenbach, 1989Go) prepared with 100 % filtered seawater. Other biochemical characteristics were determined with the API ZYM, API 20E, VITEK ANI and VITEK NHI systems (bioMérieux). Isoprenoid quinone analysis was performed by the HPLC method (Collins, 1994Go) using ubiquinone-8 extracted from Escherichia coli (strain XL1 Blue) as a reference. Fatty acid methyl ester analysis was determined by the MIDI Sherlock Microbial Identification System (Microbial ID) with cells grown on heart-infusion blood agar supplemented with 3 % NaCl at 35 °C for 24 h. Genomic DNA was extracted using a TaKaRa MiniBEST Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction kit and DNA base composition was determined by using the HPLC method (Mesbah et al., 1989Go). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 27F (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and 1525R (5'-AAGGAGTGWTCCARCC-3') (Lane, 1991Go) with Vent DNA polymerase (NEB) and sequenced using an Applied Biosystems 3100 automated DNA sequencer. Related 16S rRNA gene sequences were retrieved from the NCBI nucleotide database after searching with BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997Go). The sequences of strain UST040201-002T and related species were aligned with CLUSTAL_X (Thompson et al., 1997Go) and edited with the BioEdit sequence alignment editor V5.0.9 (Hall, 1999Go; www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html). 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values were calculated with 1255 aligned nucleotides, after removal of columns containing gaps or ambiguous nucleotides [positions 29–1419; Escherichia coli numbering (Brosius et al., 1978Go)], using BioEdit. Evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura two-parameter model (Kimura, 1980Go) and phylogenetic trees were generated by MEGA version 2.1 (Kumar et al., 2001Go) using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou & Nei, 1987Go) or the minimum-evolution algorithm and evaluated by bootstrap analyses (Felsenstein, 1985Go) based on 1000 resamplings.

At 30 °C, strain UST040201-002T grew on MA, YP-SW agar, heart-infusion agar with 5 % rabbit blood (HIAB; prepared with or without filtered seawater) and medium with 2.5 % KCl or NaCl plus 0.1 % yeast extract, but not on nutrient agar. At 25 °C, the bacterium grew on horse blood agar and chocolate agar, but not MacConkey agar. It did not grow on blood agar, chocolate agar or MacConkey agar, with or without CO2, at 37 °C. Colonies were 0.5–2.0 mm in diameter, pale yellow, circular, convex, smooth, glistening, translucent and mucoid with entire margins on YP-SW after 3 days incubation at 30 °C. On horse blood agar or chocolate agar, colonies appeared grey in colour. On HIAB agar (prepared in seawater), {alpha}-haemolysis was observed after 4 days incubation at 30 °C. In MB overnight cultures, cells of strain UST040201-002T were short rods or coccobacilli (0.35–0.70x0.70–1.50 µm), occurring singly or in pairs. In the stationary phase, spherical cells (2.5–5.7 µm) were occasionally seen. Cells were non-motile. No flagella were observed when cells were stained with 1 % phosphotungstic acid and examined by TEM. Colony morphology and phase-contrast and SEM micrographs are available as Supplementary Fig. S1a–c in IJSEM Online. Strain UST040201-002T was mesophilic and grew at 16–40 °C with optimal growth at 30–33 °C. It grew at pH 5.0–8.8, with optimal growth around pH 4.9–6.8. The strain required either Na+ or K+, but not Mg2+, for growth. It grew in 0.4–7.5 % (w/v) NaCl, with optimal growth between 2 and 3 % (w/v) NaCl. The minimum amount of KCl that supported growth was about 0.6 %. The isoprenoid quinone of strain UST040201-002T was ubiquinone-8. The DNA G+C content of strain UST040201-002T was 53.9±0.4 mol%. Table 1Go lists the phenotypic characteristics of strain UST040201-002T that were analysed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Phenotypic characteristics of strain UST040201-002T

Positive for alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4, C8), lipase, leucine arylamidase, proline arylamidase, {gamma}-glutamyl arylamidase, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-Bl-phosphorylase, beta-galactosidase, N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase, tryptophan deaminase, reduction of triphenyl tetrazolium and reduction of resazurin. Negative for valine/cystine arylamidase, trypsin, {alpha}-chromotrypsin, {alpha}-galactosidase, beta-glucuronidase, {alpha}-glucosidase, beta-glucosidase, {alpha}-mannosidase, {alpha}-fucosidase, arginine dihydrolase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, urease and the Voges–Proskauer test. Produces acid from glucose, sucrose and maltose. Does not assimilate glycerol, erythritol, D-arabinose, L-arabinose, D-ribose, D-xylose, L-xylose, D-adonitol, methyl beta-D-xylopyranoside, D-galactose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, L-sorbose, L-rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, methyl {alpha}-D-mannopyranoside, methyl {alpha}-D-glucopyranoside, N-acetylglucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, aesculin, ferric citrate, salicin, D-cellobiose, maltose, D-lactose, D-melibiose, sucrose, trehalose, inulin, D-melezitose, D-raffinose, glycogen, xylitol, gentiobiose, turanose, D-lyxose, D-tagatose, D-fucose, L-fucose, D-arabitol, L-arabitol, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-ketogluconate or potassium 5-ketogluconate. +, Positive; –, negative; W+, weakly positive.

 
The fatty acid profile of strain UST040201-002T was very different from those of other members of the genus Francisella (Table 2Go). Strain UST040201-002T contained a-17 : 0, a-15 : 0, 18 : 1{omega}9c and 14 : 0 3-OH/16 : 1 ISO I as major fatty acids, whereas members of the genus Francisella contained 10 : 0, 14 : 0, 16 : 0, 18:0, 18 : 0 3-OH and 18 : 1{omega}9c as major fatty acids.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Whole-cell fatty acid profiles of strain UST040201-002T and species of the genus Francisella

Taxa: 1, strain UST040201-002T; 2, F. tularensis/F. novicida (14 strains); 3, F. philomiragia (16 strains). Values given are percentages of total fatty acids. Values in parentheses indicate the range. Fatty acids are designated as total number of carbon atoms : number of double bonds, followed by the position of the double bond from the aliphatic end of the molecule; i, a and OH represent iso-branched, anteiso-branched and hydroxy fatty acids, respectively. Data are from this study and Hollis et al. (1989)Go. Strain UST040201-002T was grown on HIAB+3 % NaCl at 35 °C for 24 h. Other strains were grown on HIAB at 35 °C for 24 h (Hollis et al., 1989Go). c represents a cis isomer. ECL, Equivalent chain-length; tr, less than 0.8 %.

 
The nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain UST040201-002T (1515 nt positions) shared only 91 % similarity with that of the type strain of Caedibacter taeniospiralis, an obligate intracellular parasite of Paramecium tetraurelia stock 51k (Beier et al., 2002Go) and 89–90 % similarity with Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis (Olsufiev et al., 1959Go; Larsson et al., 2005Go), Francisella tularensis subsp. mediasiatica and Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica (Olsufjev & Mescheryakova, 1983Go), and Francisella novicida and Francisella philomiragia (Hollis et al., 1989Go). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain UST040201-002T shared similarities of only 84–85 % and 83–84 % with members of the families Piscirickettsiaceae and Thiotrichaceae, respectively.

Phylogenetic analysis using the neighbour-joining algorithm showed that strain UST040201-002T formed a distinct lineage within the order Thiotrichales and clustered with C. taeniospiralis with a 100 % bootstrap value; this clade was coherently linked to the lineage of Francisellaceae at 100 % bootstrap value (Fig. 1Go). This tight coherent clustering of strain UST040201-002T with C. taeniospiralis and members of the family Francisellaceae was confirmed in phylogenetic trees generated from minimum-evolution or maximum-parsimony algorithms (data not shown) and agreed with the findings of Beier et al. (2002)Go that C. taeniospiralis is closely affiliated with members of the family Francisellaceae.


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationship between strain UST040201-002T and related taxa within the order Thiotrichales based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The tree was created by using the neighbour-joining method; numbers at nodes represent bootstrap percentages from 1000 resampled datasets. Escherichia coli ATCC 11775T (GenBank accession no. X80725) was used as the outgroup. Bar, 0.02 nt substitutions per position.

 
Strain UST040201-002T shared many common phenotypic traits with members of the family Francisellaceae: Gram-negative, short rod or coccobacilli morphology, aerobic metabolism, catalase activity, lack of flagella and spores, ability to form acid from glucose but not from lactose, beta-lactamase-positive, urease-negative, and susceptible to tetracycline and chloramphenicol. However, strain UST040201-002T differed from current members of the genus Francisella by its higher G+C content and its inability to produce H2S from cysteine (Table 3Go). In particular, strain UST040201-002T could be distinguished from F. tularensis/F. novicida by its production of oxidase and gelatinase and from F. philomiragia by its inability to produce indole. On the basis of all characteristics described above, it is proposed that strain UST040201-002T be placed in a new genus in the order Thiotrichales as a representative of a novel species, Fangia hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Characteristics that differentiate strain UST040201-002T from related species of the family Francisellaceae

Taxa: 1, strain UST040201-002T; 2, F. tularensis/F. novicida; 3, F. philomiragia. Data are from Sjöstedt (2005) and this study. +, Positive; –, negative; W+, weakly positive; V, variable.

 
Description of Fangia gen. nov.
Fangia (Fan'gi.a. N.L. fem. n. Fangia named after Professor Xinfang Fang, founder of the Institute of Microbiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences).

Gram-negative, short rods to coccobacilli, occurring singly or in pairs, non-motile. Non-sporulating and non-flagellated. Divides by binary fission. Strictly aerobic, chemoheterotrophic, requiring sodium or potassium ions and organic growth factors such as yeast extract for growth. Produces acid from glucose. Catalase-positive; positive or weakly positive for oxidase. Major respiratory quinone is Q-8. Predominant fatty acids are a-17 : 0, a-15 : 0 and 18 : 1{omega}9c. Phylogenetically, Fangia is a member of the order Thiotrichales. The type species is Fangia hongkongensis.

Description of Fangia hongkongensis sp. nov.
Fangia hongkongensis (hong.kong.en'sis. N.L. fem. adj. hongkongensis pertaining to Hong Kong SAR, PR China, where the bacterium was first isolated).

In addition to the characteristics given in the genus description, exhibits the following properties. In MB, cells are short rods about 0.35–0.70 µm in diameter and 0.7–1.5 µm in length. In half-strength MB, spherical and pleomorphic cells of 0.6–4.8x0.9–4.8 µm are seen. Colonies are circular, pale yellow, translucent, smooth, shiny, convex and mucoid with entire margins. Colonies are about 0.5–2.0 mm in diameter after 3 days culture on YP-SW agar at 30 °C. Cells are mesophilic. Grows at 16–40 °C and pH 4.9–8.8, with optimal growth at 30–33 °C and around pH 4.9–6.8. Requires sodium or potassium ions for growth. Grows in 0.4–7.5 % (w/v) NaCl, with optimal growth at 2–3 % (w/v) NaCl. Physiological and biochemical properties are listed in Table 1Go. Fatty acid profile is given in Table 2Go. Resistant to ampicillin (10 µg), polymyxin B (300 U) and penicillin G (2 U) and sensitive to chloramphenicol (3 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), gentamicin sulfate (10 µg) and kanamycin (20 µg).

The type strain is UST040201-002T (=JCM 14605T=NRRL B-41860T), which was isolated from a seawater sample collected from sand-filtered seawater, in the Port Shelter adjacent to the Coastal Marine Laboratory, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We sincerely thank Professor Hans G. Trüper for valuable suggestions in the etymology, Mr Stephen Leung for scanning electron microscopy, Dr Xiancui Li for DNA G+C analysis, Miss Natalie Wai for fatty acid methyl ester analysis and Mr Simon Lau for antibiotic disc-diffusion assays. This work was supported by grants R5498, CMI03/04.SC03, CAs-CF03/04.Sc01 and CA04/05.SC01.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baumann, P. & Baumann, L. (1981). The marine Gram-negative eubacteria: genera Photobacterium, Beneckea, Alteromonas, Pseudomonas and Alcaligenes. In The Prokaryotes, pp. 1302–1331. Edited by M. P. Starr, H. Stolp, H. G. Trüper, A. Balows & H. Schlegel. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Beier, C. L., Horn, M., Michel, R., Schweikert, M., Gortz, H. D. & Wagner, M. (2002). The genus Caedibacter comprises endosymbionts of Paramecium spp. related to the Rickettsiales (Alphaproteobacteria) and to Francisella tularensis (Gammaproteobacteria). Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 6043–6050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brosius, J., Palmer, M. L., Kennedy, P. J. & Noller, H. F. (1978). Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75, 4801–4805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collins, M. D. (1994). Isoprenoid quinones. In Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics, pp. 265–309. Edited by M. Goodfellow & A. G. O'Donnell. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Collins, C. H., Lyne, P. M. & Grange, J. M. (1989). Collins and Lyne's Microbiological Methods. London/Boston: Butterworths.

Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.[CrossRef]

Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41, 95–98.

Hollis, D. G., Weaver, R. E., Steigerwalt, A. G., Wenger, J. D., Moss, C. W. & Brenner, D. J. (1989). Francisella philomiragia comb. nov. (formerly Yersinia philomiragia) and Francisella tularensis biogroup novicida (formerly Francisella novicida) associated with human disease. J Clin Microbiol 27, 1601–1608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16, 111–120.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I. B. & Nei, M. (2001). MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software. Bioinformatics 17, 1244–1245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lane, D. J. (1991). 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, pp. 115–175. Edited by E. Stackebrandt & M. Goodfellow. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Larsson, P., Oyston, P. C., Chain, P., Chu, M. C., Duffield, M., Fuxelius, H. H., Garcia, E., Halltorp, G., Johansson, D. & other authors (2005). The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat Genet 37, 153–159.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lau, K. W., Ng, C. Y., Ren, J., Lau, S. C., Qian, P. Y., Wong, P. K., Lau, T. C. & Wu, M. (2005). Owenweeksia hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium of the phylum ‘Bacteroidetes’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 1051–1057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lewin, R. A. & Lounsbery, D. M. (1969). Isolation, cultivation and characterization of flexibacteria. J Gen Microbiol 58, 145–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mesbah, M., Premachandran, U. & Whitman, W. B. (1989). Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 159–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Olsufjev, N. G., Emelyanova, O. S. & Dunaeva, T. N. (1959). Comparative study of strains of B. tularense in the Old and New World and their taxonomy. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 3, 138–149.[Medline]

Olsufjev, N. G. & Meshcheryakova, I. S. (1983). Subspecific taxonomy of Francisella tularensis McCoy and Chapin 1912. Int J Syst Bacteriol 33, 872–874.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reichenbach, H. (1989). Family 1. Cytophagaceae Stanier 1940, 630AL emend. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 3, pp. 2013–2082. Edited by J. T. Staley, M. P. Bryant, N. Pfennig & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425.[Abstract]

Sjöstedt, A. B. (2005). Genus I. Francisella Dorofe'ev 1947, 176AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, part B, pp. 200–210. Edited by D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T. Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York: Springer.

Smibert, R. M. & Krieg, N. R. (1994). Phenotypic characterization. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, pp. 607–654. Edited by P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood & N. R. Krieg. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D. G. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 4876–4882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lau, K. W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lau, K. W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lau, K. W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS