IJSEM Journal of Bacteriology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maturrano, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antón, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maturrano, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antón, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maturrano, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antón, J.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56 (2006), 1685-1691; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.64200-0
© 2006 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Salicola marasensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely halophilic bacterium isolated from the Maras solar salterns in Peru

Lenin Maturrano1, María Valens-Vadell2, Ramon Rosselló-Mora2 and Josefa Antón1

1 División de Microbiología, Departamento de Fisiología, Genética y Microbiología, Universidad de Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
2 Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats (CSIC-UIB), C/Miquel Marqués 21, E-07190 Esporles, Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain

Correspondence
Ramon Rosselló-Mora
rossello-mora{at}uib.es


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Six strains of extremely halophilic bacteria were isolated from several crystallizer ponds of the Maras solar salterns in the Peruvian Andes. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, G+C contents and DNA–DNA hybridization results, the six isolates constituted a genomically homogeneous group affiliated with the Gammaproteobacteria. The closest relatives were members of the halophilic genera Halovibrio and Halospina, which showed 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities below 97 % and whole-genome hybridization levels below 33 % for the type strain, 7Sm5T. From the genomic and phenotypic properties of the six novel isolates and phylogenetic reconstruction based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, they can be considered to represent a novel genus within the Gammaproteobacteria. On the basis of the taxonomic study, a novel genus, Salicola gen. nov., is proposed containing the single species Salicola marasensis sp. nov., which is the type species. The type strain of Salicola marasensis is 7Sm5T (=CECT 7107T=CIP 108835T).


The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains 7Sm5T, 2Sb7, 7Sa10, 7Sm7, 7Mb1 and 5Ma3 are DQ019934, DQ019935 and DQ087259–DQ087262, respectively.

Details of the reference sequences used in the construction of Fig. 1Go are available as supplementary material in IJSEM Online.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Until the description of the genus Salinibacter, only haloarchaea were considered to be of ecological relevance in solar salterns (Antón et al., 2000Go). The classification of Salinibacter ruber as a novel species within the phylum Bacteroidetes (Antón et al., 2002Go) extended the short list of extremely halophilic members of the Bacteria. There are not many characterized members of this domain able to grow under such extreme conditions [only some members of the family Ectothiorhodospiraceae of the Proteobacteria, some members of the Firmicutes (Halanaerobiaceae and Bacillaceae) and some members of the Actinobacteria], but, in all, no more than 11 genera are represented (Oren, 2002Go). However, only species of the genus Salinibacter have been reported to thrive abundantly in crystallizer ponds of solar salterns (Antón et al., 2002Go).

Hypersaline environments can be classified as thalassohaline or athalassohaline: thalassohaline water is concentrated seawater with NaCl as the major salt, while athalassohaline water is saline water that is rich in anions other than chloride and/or cations other than sodium (Oren, 2002Go). The Maras solar salterns are located at 3380 m above sea level in the heart of the Peruvian Andes (Cusco Region), and they have been exploited for more than 500 years (Basadre, 1969Go). Brines are produced from the dissolution of the surrounding rocks of the Maras formation, and their composition can be considered as thalassohaline (Maturrano et al., 2006Go). These salterns have been studied using culture-independent molecular methods to reveal the structure of the indigenous microbial community. Additionally, enrichment cultures of heterotrophic halophilic micro-organisms have been performed in order to obtain more information about the heterotrophic culturable fraction of the microbial population (Maturrano et al., 2006Go).

During the enrichment and isolation procedure of several Maras brine samples, six Gram-negative, heterotrophic strains were isolated. Here, we report the taxonomic characterization of these six isolates, which could be considered as relevant representatives of the bacterial fraction of the natural microbial community thriving in these environments (Maturrano et al., 2006Go). Together, the results showed that the six strains formed a monophyletic and genomically and phenotypically coherent group. Their closest relatives are the members of the genera Halovibrio and Halospina (Sorokin et al., 2006Go) and strain DSM 3050, which was described as the type strain of Pseudomonas halophila (Fendrich, 1988Go). The position of strain DSM 3050 is currently being re-evaluated because this strain may answer the description of Halovibrio variabilis (Sorokin & Tindall, 2006Go) rather than its original description (Fendrich, 1988Go). On the basis of the results of our taxonomic study and previous characterizations of the most closely related genera, we consider that the six Peruvian strains should be included within a novel genus and species within the Gammaproteobacteria.

For the isolation of halophilic prokaryotes, two different media were used: SW medium (containing the following, in g l–1: NaBr, 0.65; NaHCO3, 0.167; KCl, 5.0; CaCl2, 0.723; MgSO4.7H2O, 49.492; MgCl2.6H2O, 34.567; NaCl, 195.0; pH 7.0); and MS medium, designed for this work (containing the following, in g l–1: NaBr, 0.128; NaHCO3, 0.14; KCl, 0.95; CaCl2, 3.32; NaCl, 234.0; pH 7.2). In both cases, the medium was supplemented with different concentrations of yeast extract (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 %) and incubated at 37 °C for at least 4 weeks. Solid media were prepared by adding agar to a final concentration of 1.5 % prior to sterilization. Brines were plated directly onto the different media without prior enrichment.

To determine pH, salinity and temperature growth ranges, SW medium with 0.2 % yeast extract was used. Isolates were grown, in triplicate, with increasing levels of NaCl (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 % and up to saturation), at increasing pH (pH 5.0, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0) and at increasing temperatures (15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 °C). Temperature and pH tests were performed in SW medium containing 15 % salt (15 % SW) and 0.2 % yeast extract. In all cases, growth was assessed by observing increases in optical density at 600 nm up to the stationary phase.

Cell biomass for enzyme testing and macromolecule extraction was also obtained after growth on SW medium containing 1 5 % salt and 0.2 % yeast extract. Gram staining was performed using a protocol adapted for halophilic organisms (Dussault, 1955Go). Catalase activity was determined by adding 10 % (v/v) H2O2 and observing its hydrolysis and the consequent gas formation (Bradshaw, 1992Go). Oxidase activity was determined with Oxoid BR644 indicator sticks. Denitrification was analysed by growing the strains in SW medium containing 15 % salt and 0.2 % yeast extract and supplemented with 0.5 % NaNO3. Gas formation was observed from its accumulation in Durham tubes. Nitrite formation, gelatinase, amylase, casein hydrolysis and the presence of poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate were assayed according to the protocols of Smibert & Krieg (1981)Go. Enzyme assays for arginine dihydrolase, lysine decarboxylase, urease and ornithine decarboxylase were performed by following the protocols of Baumann & Baumann (1981)Go. Voges–Proskauer and methyl red assays were performed by modifying the medium by using a salt concentration of 15 % (Smibert & Krieg, 1981Go). Indole production was assayed in 15 % SW supplemented with tryptophan and by adding Kovács' indole reagent (Holding & Colle, 1971Go). Motility and H2S production were assayed on Oxoid SIM medium. Glucose fermentation, gas production, aesculin hydrolysis and beta-galactosidase were determined using the API 20NE system (bioMérieux). Carbohydrate utilization was analysed in triplicate by means of growth in 15 % SW supplemented with each of the carbohydrates at different concentrations (0.5, 1.0 and 5.0 g l–1), as described by Fendrich (1988)Go. Cellular fatty acid profiles were estimated by GC performed at the Identification Service Laboratories of the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig, Germany). Cells were grown in SW medium containing 15 % salt and with 0.2 % yeast extract as the sole carbon and energy source. Cell morphology, size and flagellation were determined by observation by electron microscopy after negative staining of cells with 1 % phosphotungstic acid (Rosselló-Mora et al., 1993Go).

Complete 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared initially with reference sequences of the nr (formerly ‘non-redundant’) database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997Go). New 16S rRNA gene sequences were then added to an alignment of about 50 000 homologous bacterial 16S rRNA gene primary structures as implemented by the ARB software package, and corresponding to the released database available at http://www.arb-home.de (Ludwig et al., 2004Go). Phylogenetic analyses were performed by the use of different datasets and by the use of the three different algorithms (neighbour joining, maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood) as implemented by the ARB software package. Finally, a consensus tree was constructed after the evaluation of the trees resulting from the use of different algorithms and datasets, as previously recommended (Ludwig et al., 1998Go).

Genomic DNA was prepared according to the method of Marmur (1961)Go. The G+C content was analysed by hydrolysis of DNA to its nucleosides, and was quantified by HPLC according to the method reported by Peña et al. (2005)Go. DNA–DNA hybridization experiments were carried out by using a non-radioactive, microtitre plate method (Ziemke et al., 1998Go).

Samples from three different crystallizer ponds were inoculated onto two different media (SW and MS) with increasing yeast extract concentrations (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 %). Of all the colonies that grew on these plates, six pure cultures were selected for taxonomic characterization because of their phylogenetic coherence and their relevance to the environment in which they thrived. The phenotypic properties shared by the six isolates and details of the isolation media are listed in Table 1Go. In all cases, colonies were non-pigmented (slightly beige) and mucoid with smooth edges when grown on 15 % SW with 0.2 % yeast extract. The cells of all isolates were rods about 1 µm long and 0.5 µm wide and were motile by means of single polar flagella. All of the isolates were extremely halophilic: no growth was observed in culture media with NaCl concentrations below 10 %. Strains were able to grow at NaCl concentrations up to 30 %, with an optimum at 15 % (Table 2Go). The optimal temperature for growth was about 35 °C and the optimal pH was 7.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Differential phenotypic characteristics among the six novel Peruvian strains (Salicola gen. nov.)

All strains showed a strict dissimilatory metabolism with oxygen as the sole electron acceptor, whereas no fermentation or nitrate respiratory pathway was detected. All were Gram-negative and motile by means of single polar flagella. All strains were positive for cytochrome c oxidase, catalase, urease, gelatin liquefaction, phenylalanine deaminase, beta-galactosidase, arginine dihydrolase and lysine decarboxylase. All were positive for the use of the following substrates as sole carbon and energy sources: fructose, galactose, glucose, arabinose, cellobiose, maltose, mannose, sucrose, trehalose, xylose, acetate, citrate, pyruvate, succinate, propionate, aesculin, ethanol, glycerol, caproate, glutamine, lactose, mannitol and sorbitol. All strains were negative for starch hydrolysis, indole production, sulphide production and ornithine decarboxylase and for growth with salicin, lactate, butyrate, caprylate, formate, malate, pelargonate and valerate as sole carbon sources.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Differential phenotypic characteristics of the novel Peruvian isolates (Salicola gen. nov.) and members of closely related genera

Data for reference taxa were taken from the following studies: Halovibrio [Fendrich, 1988Go (isolate III); Sorokin et al., 2006Go], Halospina (Sorokin et al., 2006Go), Halomonas (Vreeland, 2005Go), Microbulbifer (González, 2005Go), Marinobacter (Bowman & McMeekin, 2005Go) and Alcanivorax (Golyshin et al., 2005Go). ±, Variable; NR, not reported.

 
16S rRNA gene sequence phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1Go) showed this set of strains to be a monophyletic group that shared internal sequence similarity values of more than 99 %. The most closely related cultured strains known were Halospina denitrificans HGD 1-3T (DQ072719), Halovibrio denitrificans HGD 3T (DQ072718) and [P. halophila] DSM 3050T (AB021383), with rRNA gene similarity values ranging from 95.5 to 96.9 %. All of them formed a stable cluster of sequences representing halophilic isolates. The whole group of Maras sequences can be regarded as an independent branch within this clade of halophilic species (Fig. 1Go), since all treeing approaches showed the sequences as a single independent branch. We could not resolve the branching order of the neighbouring genera with respect to the clade of halophiles. However, and in contrast to the tree reported by Sorokin et al. (2006)Go, we could not confirm Marinobacter as the closest relative. In our case, all of the related genera showed incongruent branching patterns that varied depending on the treeing approach used or the dataset used. The branching orders that could not be resolved were drawn as multifurcations, as recommended by Ludwig et al. (1998)Go. However, all of the bifurcations shown in the tree appeared to be stable independently of the algorithm, dataset or mask used in the analysis.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic reconstruction based on a neighbour-joining calculation. The tree was modified after multiple analysis of different datasets and by the use of maximum-parsimony, neighbour-joining and maximum-likelihood algorithms. To reconstruct the phylogeny and resolve branching patterns, the different datasets were analysed by using all homologous positions in the alignment, by using consensus masks that removed all the non-conserved indels of the domain Bacteria or by using maximum-frequency masks that removed highly variable positions within the Gammaproteobacteria, as implemented by the ARB datafile. The resulting tree shows a consensus topology where multifurcations indicate those branching orders that could not be resolved unambiguously. In this tree, representative members of the genera Halomonas, Carnimonas, Zymobacter, Alcanivorax, Marinobacter, Zooshikella, Hahella and Microbulbifer appear hidden within their respective phylogenetic clades. Details of the sequences used are given in Supplementary Table S1 in IJSEM Online. Bar, 5 % sequence divergence.

 
The genomic traits represented by G+C content and DNA–DNA reassociation indicated that the six novel isolates also constituted a homogeneous genomic group (Table 1Go). The strains had nearly identical G+C contents in the range 61.3–61.7 mol%, and the DNA of each of them reassociated with strain 7Sm5T at values above 64.6 %. The three most closely related strains, DSM 3050T, HGD 1-3T and HGD 3T, which represented the phylogenetically closest genera, gave hybridization results of 33.1, 31.6 and 25.7 %, respectively. The pooled standard deviation of the experiments was 1 %.

The six extremely halophilic strains from Maras shared a homogeneous phenotype but showed some intraspecific diversity (Table 1Go). All members of this phylogenetic branch showed positive reactions for cytochrome c oxidase, catalase, urease, gelatinase, beta-galactosidase and phenylalanine decarboxylase, as well as for a large number of compounds that could serve as primary substrates for growth (Table 1Go). Additionally, the members of this phylogenetic branch harbouring extreme halophiles could be differentiated from the most closely related genera by means of traits such as type of motility, ability to hydrolyse gelatin and urea, inability to respire nitrate and hydrolyse starch and by the ability to use carbohydrates (Table 2Go). Intraspecifically, the group of extremely halophilic, Peruvian strains differed in traits such as aesculin and casein hydrolysis and by the use of alanine, glycine and benzoate.

Finally, all of the fatty acid profiles of the Peruvian isolates were very similar (Table 3Go), having C12 : 0 3-OH, C16 : 0, C18 : 1{omega}9c and C18 : 0 10-methyl as the major components. The similar features are in accordance with previously reported profiles for closely related strains (Sorokin et al., 2006Go). However, the Peruvian isolates can be differentiated from representatives of the most closely related genera (DSM 3050T, HGD 1-3T and HGD 3T) by their relatively high C18 : 0 10-methyl content.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Fatty acid profiles of the novel Peruvian strains (Salicola gen. nov.) and some closely related strains

Data were obtained in this study or were taken from Sorokin et al. (2006)Go (for Halovibrio denitrificans HGD 3T and Halospina denitrificans HGD 1-3T). Values are percentages of total fatty acids; –, not detected.

 
The six extremely halophilic isolates from Maras were shown to be a monophyletic set of individuals with enough phenotypic and genetic coherence to be considered as an independent taxon with respect to their closest relatives (Rosselló-Mora & Amann, 2001Go; Stackebrandt et al., 2002Go). The strains analysed were isolated from different crystallizer ponds, which indicates both that they might correspond to different populations and that they may represent an important fraction of the prokaryotes inhabiting Maras' brines. Indeed, this hypothesis was corroborated by culture-independent techniques, since members of this group were found, by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, to be the most abundant members of the Bacteria in the brines (Maturrano et al., 2006Go). Although 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of the novel strains revealed a high degree of sequence similarity, the strains differed from each other in terms of genome content, as was demonstrated by the different DNA–DNA hybridization values obtained. Phylogenetically related strains have been isolated recently in similar environments, but they did not constitute an important fraction in relation to the total microbiota cultured at the same time (Caton et al., 2004Go). Additionally, it seems that relatives of [P. halophila] could enhance growth of Walsby's square archaeon when co-cultured under laboratory conditions (Bolhuis et al., 2004Go). All of these data are indications that members of this phylogenetic branch may be relevant in their own environments.

Together, the data indicate that the six extremely halophilic isolates from Maras can be regarded as representing a single species independent of Halovibrio and Halospina species (Fendrich, 1988Go; Sorokin et al., 2006Go). In view of the way in which novel genera have been classified, our observations lead us to include the novel species within a novel genus, Salicola gen. nov. We propose the binomial Salicola marasensis sp. nov. for the novel group of extremely halophilic organisms isolated from crystallizer ponds of the Maras solar salterns in the Peruvian Andes, as they may be the most abundant and representative bacterial heterotrophs in this Andean environment.

Description of Salicola gen. nov.
Salicola (Sa.li'co.la. L. n. sal, salis salt, salt water, brine; L. masc. suff. -cola from L. n. incola an inhabitant; N.L. masc. n. Salicola an inhabitant of brine).

Rod-shaped bacteria, motile by means of single polar flagella. Phylogenetically affiliated to the Gammaproteobacteria. Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, heterotrophic, oxidase-, catalase-, urease-, phenylalanine decarboxylase-, beta-galactosidase- and gelatinase-positive and able to use carbohydrates. Inhabitants of highly saline habitats such as salt lakes, saltern ponds and salt flats; in general, optimum growth occurs at salt concentrations above 14 % (w/v). Major fatty acids of the genus are C12 : 0 3-OH, C16 : 0, C18 : 1{omega}9c and C18 : 0 10-methyl. The latter fatty acid distinguishes Salicola species from the most closely related genera. The DNA G+C content of members of the genus ranges between 61.3 and 61.9 mol%. The type species of the genus is Salicola marasensis.

Description of Salicola marasensis sp. nov.
Salicola marasensis (ma.ra.sen'sis N.L. masc. adj. marasensis pertaining to Maras, a region of the Peruvian Andes, where the first strains were isolated).

Cells are straight rods, motile by means of single polar flagella. Gram-negative. Extremely halophilic with an optimum NaCl requirement (in medium) of 15 %, though growth has been reported at NaCl concentrations up to 30 %. No growth is observed below 10 % NaCl. The temperature optimum for growth is 35 °C. Strictly aerobic with a chemo-organotrophic metabolism; able to use carbohydrates as sole carbon and energy sources. Members of this species can be distinguished from other related species by their extreme halophily, by their temperature optimum and by their arginine dihydrolase and lysine decarboxylase activities. pH for growth ranges from 6.0 to 8.0, with an optimal pH of 7.0. Among the major fatty acids observed for the genus, C16 : 0 and C18 : 0 10-methyl predominate over C12 : 0 3-OH and C18 : 1{omega}9c. The DNA G+C content is 61.3–61.9 mol%.

The type strain, strain 7Sm5T (=CECT 7107T=CIP 108835T), was isolated from one of the saltern crystallizer ponds at Maras in the Peruvian Andes, and was one of the most representative inhabitants of these ponds.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors want to thank Brian Tindall of the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen for providing type-strain cell material for DNA extraction, Jean Euzéby for invaluable help with the formation of names and Wolfgang Ludwig for maintaining a curated ARB database. The authors' research is funded by the following projects: BIO2000-005-P4-04 and BOS-2003-05198-C02-01 and BOS-2003-05198-C02-02 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education, grant GRUPOS03/137 from the Generalitat Valenciana and the network of excellence Marine Genomics Europe (GOCE-CT-505403) of the European Union.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Antón, J., Rosselló-Mora, R., Rodríguez-Valera, F. & Amann, R. (2000). Extremely halophilic Bacteria in crystallizer ponds from solar salterns. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 3052–3057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Antón, J., Oren, A., Benlloch, S., Rodríguez-Valera, F., Amann, R. & Rosselló-Mora, R. (2002). Salinibacter ruber gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel, extremely halophilic member of the Bacteria from saltern crystallizer ponds. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 485–491.[Abstract]

Basadre, J. (1969). Historia del Perú. Lima: San Marcos (in Spanish).

Baumann, P. & Baumann, L. (1981). The marine Gram-negative eubacteria: genera Photobacterium, Beneckea, Alteromonas, Pseudomonas and Alcaligenes. In The Prokaryotes, pp. 1302–1330. Edited by M. P. Starr, H. Stolp, H. G. Trüper, A. Balows & H. G. Schlegel. Berlin: Springer.

Bolhuis, H., Te Poele, E. M. & Rodríguez-Valera, F. (2004). Isolation and cultivation of Walsby's square archaeon. Environ Microbiol 6, 1287–1291.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bowman, J. P. & McMeekin, T. A. (2005). Genus VII. Marinobacter. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, The Proteobacteria, part B, The Gammaproteobacteria, pp. 459–463. Edited by D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T. Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York: Springer.

Bradshaw, L. J. (1992). Laboratory Microbiology, 4th edn. Fort Worth, TX: Saunders College Publishing.

Caton, T. M., Witte, L. R., Ngyuen, H. D., Buchheim, J. A., Buchheim, M. A. & Schneegurt, M. A. (2004). Halotolerant aerobic heterotrophic bacteria from the Great Salt Plains of Oklahoma. Microb Ecol 48, 449–462.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dussault, H. P. (1955). An improved technique for staining red halophilic bacteria. J Bacteriol 70, 484–485.[Free Full Text]

Fendrich, C. (1988). Halovibrio variabilis gen. nov., sp. nov, Pseudomonas halophila sp. nov. and a new halophilic aerobic coccoid eubacterium from Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA. Syst Appl Microbiol 11, 36–43.

Golyshin, Y., Harayama, S., Timmis, K. N. & Yakimov, M. M. (2005). Genus I. Alcanivorax. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, The Proteobacteria, part B, The Gammaproteobacteria, pp. 295–299. Edited by D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T. Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York: Springer.

González, J. M. (2005). Genus IX. Microbulbifer. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, The Proteobacteria, part B, The Gammaproteobacteria, pp. 464–465. Edited by D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T. Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York: Springer.

Holding, A. J. & Colle, J. G. (1971). Routine biochemical tests. Methods Microbiol 6A, 1–32.

Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Klugbauer, S., Klugbauer, N., Weizenegger, M., Neumaier, J., Bachleitner, M. & Schleifer, K.-H. (1998). Bacterial phylogeny based on comparative sequence analysis. Electrophoresis 19, 554–568.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Westram, R. & 29 other authors (2004). ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1363–1371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marmur, J. (1961). A procedure for the isolation of DNA from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 3, 208–218.

Maturrano, L., Santos, F., Rosselló-Mora, R. & Antón, J. (2006). Microbial diversity in Maras salterns, a hypersaline environment in the Peruvian Andes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 3887–3895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oren, A. (2002). Halophilic Microorganisms and their Environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Peña, A., Valens, M., Santos, F., Buczolits, S., Antón, J., Kämpfer, P., Busse, H.-J., Amann, R. & Rosselló-Mora, R. (2005). Intraspecific comparative analysis of the species Salinibacter ruber. Extremophiles 9, 151–161.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rosselló-Mora, R. & Amann, R. (2001). The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25, 39–67.[Medline]

Rosselló-Mora, R., García-Valdés, E. & Lalucat, J. (1993). Taxonomic relationship between Pseudomonas perfectomarina ZoBell and Pseudomonas stutzteri. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43, 852–854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smibert, R. M. & Krieg, N. R. (1981). General characterization. In Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology, pp. 409–443. Edited by P. Gerhard, R. G. E. Murray, R. N. Costilow, E. W. Nester, W. A. Wood, N. R. Krieg & G. B. Philips. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Sorokin, D. Y. & Tindall, B. J. (2006). The status of the genus name Halovibrio Fendrich 1989 and the identity of the strains Pseudomonas halophila DSM 3050 and Halomonas variabilis DSM 3051. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 487–489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sorokin, D. Y., Tourova, T. P., Galinski, E. A., Belloch, C. & Tindall, B. J. (2006). Extremely halophilic denitrifying bacteria from hypersaline inland lakes, Halovibrio denitrificans sp. nov. and Halospina denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., and evidence that the genus name Halovibrio Fendrich 1989 with the type species H. variabilis should be associated with DSM 3050. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 379–388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stackebrandt, E., Frederiksen, W., Garrity, G. & 10 other authors (2002). Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1043–1047.[Abstract]

Vreeland, R. H. (2005). Genus I. Halomonas. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, The Proteobacteria, part B, The Gammaproteobacteria, pp. 300–313. Edited by D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York: Springer.

Ziemke, F., Höfle, M. G., Lalucat, J. & Rosselló-Mora, R. (1998). Reclassification of Shewanella putrefaciens Owen's genomic group II as Shewanella baltica sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 179–186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
D. Yu. Sorokin, T. P. Tourova, G. Muyzer, and G. J. Kuenen
Thiohalospira halophila gen. nov., sp. nov. and Thiohalospira alkaliphila sp. nov., novel obligately chemolithoautotrophic, halophilic, sulfur-oxidizing gammaproteobacteria from hypersaline habitats
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, July 1, 2008; 58(7): 1685 - 1692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
K. Kharroub, M. Aguilera, T. Quesada, J. A. Morillo, A. Ramos-Cormenzana, A. Boulharouf, and M. Monteoliva-Sanchez
Salicola salis sp. nov., an extremely halophilic bacterium isolated from Ezzemoul sabkha in Algeria.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, November 1, 2006; 56(Pt 11): 2647 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maturrano, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antón, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maturrano, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antón, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maturrano, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antón, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS