IJSEM Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vandieken, V.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vandieken, V.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, B. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vandieken, V.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, B. B.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56 (2006), 681-685; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.64057-0
© 2006 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Desulfovibrio frigidus sp. nov. and Desulfovibrio ferrireducens sp. nov., psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from Arctic fjord sediments (Svalbard) with the ability to reduce Fe(III)

Verona Vandieken1, Christian Knoblauch2 and Bo Barker Jørgensen1

1 Max-Planck-Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstr. 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany
2 University of Hamburg, Institute of Soil Science, Allende-Platz 2, 20146 Hamburg, Germany

Correspondence
Verona Vandieken
vvandiek{at}mpi-bremen.de


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Strains 18T, 61T and 77 were isolated from two permanently cold fjord sediments on the west coast of Svalbard. The three psychrotolerant strains, with temperature optima at 20–23 °C, were able to grow at the freezing point of sea water, –2 °C. The strains oxidized important fermentation products such as hydrogen, formate and lactate with sulfate as the electron acceptor. Sulfate could be replaced by sulfite, thiosulfate or elemental sulfur. Poorly crystalline and soluble Fe(III) compounds were reduced in sulfate-free medium, but no growth occurred under these conditions. In the absence of electron acceptors, fermentative growth was possible. The pH optimum for the strains was around 7·1. The DNA G+C contents were 43·3 and 42·0 mol% for strains 18T and 61T, respectively. Strains 18T, 61T and 77 were most closely related to Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis (95·0–95·7 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity). Strains 18T and 77, exhibiting 99·9 % sequence similarity, represent a novel species for which the name Desulfovibrio frigidus sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is strain 18T (=DSM 17176T=JCM 12924T). Strain 61T was closely related to strains 18T and 77 (97·6 and 97·5 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity), but on the basis of DNA–DNA hybridization strain 61T represents a novel species for which the name Desulfovibrio ferrireducens sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is strain 61T (=DSM 16995T=JCM 12925T).


Published online ahead of print on 18 November 2005 as DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.64057-0.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of Desulfovibrio frigidus strains 18T and 77 are DQ148943 and DQ148945, and that for Desulfovibrio ferrireducens strain 61T is DQ148944.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Dissimilatory sulfate reduction is the most important anaerobic mineralization pathway in many temperate and permanently cold marine sediments (e.g. Jørgensen, 1982Go; Canfield et al., 1993Go; Thamdrup & Canfield, 1996Go; Rysgaard et al., 1998Go; Kostka et al., 1999Go; Glud et al., 2000Go). Most sulfate-reducing bacteria are phylogenetically placed within the Deltaproteobacteria, including the genus Desulfovibrio, which comprises 42 described species. A special characteristic of some Desulfovibrio strains is the ability to reduce Fe(III) compounds without gaining energy for growth (Coleman et al., 1993Go; Lovley et al., 1993Go; Li et al., 2004Go). Here, we report the isolation of three novel psychrotolerant Desulfovibrio-related strains with the ability to reduce Fe(III).

Strain 61T was isolated from an enrichment culture of artificial sea-water medium (Widdel & Bak, 1992Go) with approximately 30 mM poorly crystalline iron oxide, 0·4 mM MgSO4.7H2O and 20 mM lactate at 10 °C, which was inoculated with surface sediment of Tempelfjorden, Station CD (78° 25·267' N 17° 08·277' E; bottom water temperature 2·8 °C). Iron oxide was replaced by ferric citrate (approx. 30 mM) for isolation in deep-agar dilution series. Cells of strain 61T were motile vibrios and the 16S rRNA gene sequence was 95·7 % similar to the sequence of Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis AM13T. The ability of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans to reduce Fe(III) for several consecutive transfers has been shown previously (Lovley et al., 1993Go); however, the authors suggested that the strains grew with 0·3 mM sulfate in the medium and not by Fe(III) reduction. Correspondingly, we could not determine unequivocally whether strain 61T grew by Fe(III) reduction or with 0·4 mM sulfate in the medium. Strains 18T and 77 were enriched and isolated under sulfate-reducing conditions with 28 mM sulfate, 20 mM lactate and 10 mM formate at 4 and 17 °C from sediment of Tempelfjorden, Station CC (78° 26·039' N 17° 19·722' E; bottom water temperature 3·1 °C) and Smeerenburgfjorden, Station J (79° 42·006' N 11° 05·199' E; bottom water temperature 2·3 °C), respectively. 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that strains 18T and 77 were closely related to Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis and the novel strain 61T.

The general physiological characteristics of strains 18T, 61T and 77 were evaluated under sulfate-reducing conditions with lactate as the electron donor in a medium with a lower salt concentration (salt-water medium) (Widdel & Bak, 1992Go) at their respective isolation temperature. Cultures growing with alternative substrates were transferred into fresh test medium for verification. Temperature tolerance of the strains was determined in an aluminium temperature-gradient block at 12 different temperatures between –2 and 32 °C (Sagemann et al., 1998Go). The salt requirement was determined in media with 12 different NaCl concentrations between 0·05 and 5 % (w/v) and 10 different MgCl2.6H2O concentrations between 0·02 and 3·6 % (w/v). The pH optima of the strains were determined in media with 12 different pH values (in triplicate) that covered a range from pH 5·5 to 8·8. For all tests, growth was monitored spectrophotometrically (UV 1202; Shimadzu) by measuring optical density at 580 nm.

PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene was performed with the primers 8F and 1492R, and the PCR product was amplified for sequence analysis with primers 8F, 341F, 518F, 534R, 1099F and 1492R (Buchholz-Cleven et al., 1997Go). Phylogenetic positions of the three novel strains were evaluated by using the ARB program (Ludwig et al., 2004Go) with the neighbour-joining, maximum-likelihood and maximum-parsimony algorithms in combination with different sets of filters.

Strains 61T and 77 showed a vibrioid or sigmoid morphology, 2·5–5·5x0·5–0·7 µm in size, whereas cells of strain 18T were straight rods, 3·5–4·5x0·5–0·7 µm in size. Cells of all strains were motile by means of a single polar flagellum as indicated by electron microscopy (Fig. 1Go). Gram staining was negative for all strains.


Figure 1
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Electron micrographs (negative stain with uranyl acetate) of Desulfovibrio ferrireducens sp. nov. 61T (a) and Desulfovibrio frigidus sp. nov. 18T (b), showing the sigmoid shape of strain 61T and the straight rod shape of strain 18T. Cells of both strains are motile by a single monopolar flagellum. Bars, 0·5 µm.

 
Vitamins were not required for growth. The strains grew at sea-water concentrations of NaCl and MgCl2. NaCl optima were 2–3 % for strains 18T and 77 and 1–2·5 % for strain 61T, and strains 18T, 61T and 77 grew with NaCl concentrations of 2–3·5, 0·7–4 and 1·5–4 %, respectively. MgCl2 optima were 0·04–1·9, 0·02–2·5 and 0·4 % and MgCl2 growth ranges were from 0·02 to 2·5, to 3·5 and to 1·9 % for strains 18T, 61T and 77, respectively. The pH optima were 6·9–7·2, 7·1–7·5 and 7·1 and growth was observed at pH 6·9–7·5, 6·3–7·5 and 6·7–7·5 for strains 18T, 61T and 77, respectively. Common end-products of fermentation such as lactate, formate and hydrogen served as electron donors (Table 1Go). The strains reduced sulfate and other sulfur compounds like sulfite, thiosulfate or elemental sulfur (Table 1Go). Reduction of ferric citrate or poorly crystalline iron oxide in sulfate-free medium was observed in two to four consecutive transfers for all three strains. Reduction of Fe(III) became slower with every transfer and we suggest that the strains did not conserve energy for growth. The ability for Fe(III) reduction was previously described for several species of Desulfovibrio (Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Desulfovibrio sulfodismutans, Desulfovibrio baarsii and Desulfovibrio sp. strain G-11) as well as for Desulfomicrobium baculatum and Desulfobacterium autotrophicum (Coleman et al., 1993Go; Lovley et al., 1993Go; Li et al., 2004Go). Growth by Fe(III) reduction has so far only been shown for the two sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfobulbus propionicus and ‘Desulfotomaculum reducens’ (Tebo & Obraztsova, 1998Go; Holmes et al., 2004Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics of Desulfovibrio ferrireducens strain 61T, Desulfovibrio frigidus strains 18T and 77 and closely related species

Strains/species: 1, Desulfovibrio ferrireducens sp. nov. 61T; 2, Desulfovibrio frigidus sp. nov. 18T; 3, Desulfovibrio frigidus sp. nov. 77; 4,Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis; 5, Desulfovibrio zosterae; 6, Desulfovibrio salexigens. Data from Postgate & Campbell (1966)Go, Postgate (1984)Go, Zellner et al. (1989)Go, Nielsen et al. (1999)Go and Alazard et al. (2003)Go. +, Substrate used for growth; –, substrate not used for growth; +/–, substrate reduced but no growth; (+), substrate poorly utilized; ND, not determined. Electron acceptors tested but not reduced by strains 18T, 61T and 77: nitrate (20 mM), nitrite (10 mM), oxygen (air), malate (20 mM), fumarate (20 mM) and manganese oxide (approx. 30 mM). Electron donors tested but not oxidized: acetate (20 mM), butyrate (10 mM), propionate (10 mM), hexanoate (3 mM), malate (10 mM), butanol (10 mM), pyruvate (10 mM), fructose (1 g l–1), glucose (1 g l–1), glycerol (10 mM), glycine (10 mM), glutarate (10 mM), serine (10 mM), proline (10 mM), betaine (10 mM), sorbitol (5 mM), nicotinate (1 mM), yeast extract (0·05 g l–1), casein (0·05 g l–1) and choline chloride (10 mM). Substrates tested for disproportionation but not used: lactate and fructose.

 
Although isolated at different temperatures (4, 10 and 17 °C), all three strains showed similar temperature optima for growth at 20–23 °C (Table 1Go) and were able to grow at the freezing point of sea water, –2 °C. According to their temperature range, the strains can be considered as psychrotolerant.

The DNA G+C contents were 42·0 and 43·3 mol% for strains 61T and 18T, respectively (Table 1Go), and were determined by the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany. Strains 18T and 77 were closely related to each other (99·9 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity) (Fig. 2Go), therefore we suggest that these two strains belong to the same species. 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity was 97·6 % between strains 61T and 18T and 97·5 % between strains 61T and 77 (Fig. 2Go). DNA–DNA hybridization was done by the DSMZ and DNA–DNA relatedness was 14·5 % between strains 61T and 18T and 18·3 % between strains 61T and 77. Therefore, we propose the description of two novel species: Desulfovibrio ferrireducens (type strain 61T) and Desulfovibrio frigidus (type strain 18T). Both strains 61T and 18T are closely related to the undescribed Desulfovibrio sp. strain Aspo3 (respectively 97·4 and 95·4 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity) isolated from subterranean groundwater (Pedersen et al., 1996Go), as well as to Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis (95·7 and 95·0 %) isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal chimney (Alazard et al., 2003Go), Desulfovibrio zosterae (94·8 and 94·3 %) isolated from marine seagrass roots (Nielsen et al., 1999Go) and Desulfovibrio salexigens (94·6 and 95 %) (Fig. 2Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the position of the isolated strains 18T, 61T and 77within the genus Desulfovibrio and in relation to other sulfate-reducing bacteria with the ability to reduce Fe(III). The tree was calculated using maximum-likelihood algorithm with a 50 % filter for Deltaproteobacteria. Bar, 10 % estimated sequence divergence.

 
The isolated strains and their closest relatives, Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis, Desulfovibrio zosterae and Desulfovibrio salexigens, share the ability to reduce sulfate and use lactate, ethanol, fumarate, formate plus acetate and hydrogen plus acetate as electron donors. They can be distinguished by their substrate usage and additionally by their temperature ranges of growth (Table 1Go). Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis, Desulfovibrio zosterae and Desulfovibrio salexigens are mesophiles with temperature optima at 33–37 °C (Postgate, 1984Go; Nielsen et al., 1999Go; Alazard et al., 2003Go), whereas strains 18T, 61T and 77 are psychrotolerant (temperature optima at 20–23 °C) and able to grow at –2 °C. As the three strains were isolated from fjord sediments with temperatures of 2–3 °C at the time of sampling, they are able to grow at the permanently low in situ temperature of Svalbard sediments.

Description of Desulfovibrio ferrireducens sp. nov.
Desulfovibrio ferrireducens [fer.ri.re.du'cens. L. n. ferrum iron; L. part. adj. reducens leading back, bringing back and in chemistry converting to a different oxidation state; N.L. part. adj. ferrireducens reducing Fe(III) to Fe(II)].

Cells are vibrioid or sigmoid, 2·5–5·5x0·7 µm in size, motile by a single polar flagellum. Gram-negative. No vitamins are required for growth. Lactate, formate, hydrogen, ethanol, propanol, fumarate and succinate are oxidized with sulfate reduction. Sulfate, thiosulfate and sulfite serve as electron acceptors. Iron compounds [Fe(III) oxide and Fe(III) citrate] are reduced without growth. Disproportionation of malate, pyruvate and fumarate. Optimum NaCl concentration is 1–2·5 %, and growth occurs between 0·7 and 4 % NaCl; for MgCl2 the optimum concentration is between 0·02 and 2·5 % and growth occurs up to a concentration of 3·5 %. pH optimum is 7·1–7·5 and pH range is 6·3–7·5. Temperature optimum is 23 °C and growth range is between –2 and 30 °C. The DNA G+C content is 42·0 mol%.

The type strain, 61T (=DSM 16995T=JCM 12925T), was isolated from a permanently cold sediment of the west coast of Svalbard.

Description of Desulfovibrio frigidus sp. nov.
Desulfovibrio frigidus (fri'gi.dus. L. masc. adj. frigidus cold, referring to growth in the permanently cold sediment of Svalbard).

Cells are rod-shaped or vibrioid, 2–5x0·7 µm in size, motile by a single polar flagellum. Gram-negative. No vitamins are required for growth. Lactate, formate, hydrogen, ethanol, fumarate and alanine are oxidized with sulfate reduction; one strain oxidizes propanol. Sulfate and sulfite serve as electron acceptors; one strain reduces elemental sulfur. Iron compounds [Fe(III) oxide and Fe(III) citrate] are reduced without growth. Disproportionation of malate, pyruvate, fumarate and glucose is possible for one or the other strain. Growth range for NaCl and MgCl2 is different for the two strains, but the optimum NaCl concentration is 2–3 %, and growth occurs at 2–3·5 % NaCl; for MgCl2 the optimum concentration is around 0·4 % and growth occurs up to a concentration of 1·9 %. pH optimum is 7·1 and pH range is 6·9–7·5. Temperature optimum is at 20–23 °C and growth range is from –2 to 25 °C. The DNA G+C content is 43·3 mol%.

Strain 18T (=DSM 17176T=JCM 12924T) is the type strain. Strain 77 is a second strain of the species. Both strains were isolated from a permanently cold sediment at the west coast of Svalbard.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Anke Toltz at the University of Bremen for help with the electron micrographs. Thanks to Carol Arnosti, Volker Brüchert, Niko Finke, Swantje Lilienthal and Christoph Vogt for the enjoyable trip to Svalbard and Stig Henningsen (Captain) and John Mortensen (first mate) for the interesting cruise with MS Farm. We thank the Alfred-Wegener-Institute for providing laboratory space at the Koldewey Station. This project was supported by the Max Planck Society.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Alazard, D., Dukan, S., Urios, A., Verhé, F., Bouabida, N., Morel, F., Thomas, P., Garcia, J.-L. & Ollivier, B. (2003). Desulfovibrio hydrothermalis sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from hydrothermal vents. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 173–178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buchholz-Cleven, B. E. E., Rattunde, B. & Straub, K. L. (1997). Screening for genetic diversity of isolates of anaerobic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria using DGGE and whole-cell hybridization. Syst Appl Microbiol 20, 301–309.

Canfield, D. E., Jørgensen, B. B., Fossing, H. & 7 other authors (1993). Pathways of organic carbon oxidation in three continental margin sediments. Mar Geol 113, 27–40.

Coleman, M. L., Hedrick, D. B., Lovley, D. R., White, D. C. & Pye, K. (1993). Reduction of Fe(III) in sediments by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature 361, 436–438.[CrossRef]

Glud, R. N., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Thamdrup, B., Fossing, H. & Rysgaard, S. (2000). Benthic carbon mineralization in a high-Arctic sound (Young Sound, NE-Greenland). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 206, 59–71.

Holmes, D. E., Bond, D. R. & Lovley, D. R. (2004). Electron transfer by Desulfobulbus propionicus to Fe(III) and graphite electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 1234–1237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jørgensen, B. B. (1982). Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 296, 643–645.[CrossRef]

Kostka, J. E., Thamdrup, B., Glud, R. N. & Canfield, D. E. (1999). Rates and pathways of carbon oxidation in permanently cold Arctic sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180, 7–21.

Li, Y.-L., Vali, H., Sears, S. K., Yang, J., Deng, B. & Zhang, C. L. (2004). Iron reduction and alteration of nontronite NAu-2 by a sulfate-reducing bacterium. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68, 3251–3260.

Lovley, D. R., Roden, E. E., Phillips, E. J. P. & Woodward, J. C. (1993). Enzymatic iron and uranium reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Mar Geol 113, 41–53.

Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Westram, R. & 29 other authors (2004). ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1363–1371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nielsen, J. L., Liesack, W. & Finster, K. (1999). Desulfovibrio zosterae sp. nov., a new sulfate reducer isolated from surface-sterilized roots of the seagrass Zostera marina. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 859–865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pedersen, K., Arlinger, J., Ekendahl, S. & Hallbeck, L. (1996). 16S rRNA gene diversity of attached and unattached bacteria in boreholes along the access tunnel to the Äspö hard rock laboratory, Sweden. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 19, 249–262.[CrossRef]

Postgate, J. R. (1984). Genus Desulfovibrio Kluyver and van Niel 1936, 397AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, pp. 666–672. Edited by N. R. Krieg & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Postgate, J. R. & Campbell, L. L. (1966). Classification of Desulfovibrio species, the nonsporulating sulfate-reducing bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 30, 732–738.[Free Full Text]

Rysgaard, S., Thamdrup, B., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Fossing, H., Berg, P., Christensen, P. B. & Dalsgaard, T. (1998). Seasonal carbon and nutrient mineralization in a high-Arctic coastal marine sediment, Young Sound, Northeast Greenland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 175, 261–276.

Sagemann, J., Jørgensen, B. B. & Greef, O. (1998). Temperature dependence and rates of sulfate reduction in cold sediments of Svalbard, Arctic Ocean. Geomicrobiol J 15, 85–100.

Tebo, B. M. & Obraztsova, A. Y. (1998). Sulfate-reducing bacterium grows with Cr(VI), U(VI), Mn(IV), and Fe(III) as electron acceptors. FEMS Microbiol Lett 162, 193–198.[CrossRef]

Thamdrup, B. & Canfield, D. E. (1996). Pathways of carbon oxidation in continental margin sediments off central Chile. Limnol Oceanogr 41, 1629–1650.

Widdel, F. & Bak, F. (1992). Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In The Prokaryotes, pp. 3352–3378. Edited by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K. H. Schleifer. New York: Springer.

Zellner, G., Messner, P., Kneifel, H. & Winter, J. (1989). Desulfovibrio simplex spec. nov., a new sulfate-reducing bacterium from a sour whey digester. Arch Microbiol 152, 329–334.[CrossRef]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
H. Sass, S. Ramamoorthy, C. Yarwood, H. Langner, P. Schumann, R. M. Kroppenstedt, S. Spring, and R. F. Rosenzweig
Desulfovibrio idahonensis sp. nov., sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from a metal(loid)-contaminated freshwater sediment
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, September 1, 2009; 59(9): 2208 - 2214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
Z. Ben Ali Gam, R. Oueslati, S. Abdelkafi, L. Casalot, J. L. Tholozan, and M. Labat
Desulfovibrio tunisiensis sp. nov., a novel weakly halotolerant, sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from exhaust water of a Tunisian oil refinery
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, May 1, 2009; 59(5): 1059 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
T. S. Sasi Jyothsna, Ch. Sasikala, and Ch. V. Ramana
Desulfovibrio psychrotolerans sp. nov., a psychrotolerant and moderately alkaliphilic sulfate-reducing deltaproteobacterium from the Himalayas
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, April 1, 2008; 58(4): 821 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. Stolyar, Q. He, M. P. Joachimiak, Z. He, Z. K. Yang, S. E. Borglin, D. C. Joyner, K. Huang, E. Alm, T. C. Hazen, et al.
Response of Desulfovibrio vulgaris to Alkaline Stress
J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2007; 189(24): 8944 - 8952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vandieken, V.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vandieken, V.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, B. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vandieken, V.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, B. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS