|
|
||||||||
Request for an Opinion |
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Box 44, Morse Institute of Molecular Genetics, College of Medicine, State University of New York, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
2 Centre for Tropical Antiprotozoal Chemotherapy, Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK
Correspondence
Harold Neimark
neimah25{at}hscbklyn.edu
ABSTRACT
Eperythrozoon coccoides, an epierythrocytic organism that causes a mild haemolytic anaemia in laboratory and wild mice, currently is thought to be a rickettsia. To determine the relationship of this agent to other haemotrophic bacterial parasites, the 16S rRNA gene of this organism has been sequenced and it is shown by phylogenetic analysis that this wall-less bacterium is not a rickettsia but actually is a mycoplasma. This mycoplasma shares properties with and is closely related to the other uncultivated mycoplasmas that comprise a recently identified group, the haemotrophic mycoplasmas (haemoplasmas). The haemoplasma group is composed of former Eperythrozoon and Haemobartonella species as well as newly identified haemotrophic mycoplasmas. Haemoplasmas parasitize the surface of erythrocytes of a wide variety of vertebrate animal hosts and are transmitted mainly by blood-feeding arthropod vectors. Because both primary infections and chronic latent infections caused by this bacterium have been observed in many laboratories and this bacterium has been the subject of much experimental work, considerable information exists about this haemotrophic mycoplasma that may be applicable to other haemoplasmas. It is proposed that Eperythrozoon coccoides be reclassified as Mycoplasma coccoides comb. nov. A Request for an Opinion is submitted to the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes regarding this reclassification.
Eperythrozoon coccoides is a blood parasite of laboratory and wild mice and was one of the first discovered members (Schilling, 1928
; Dinger, 1928
, 1929
) of what has emerged as a large and ubiquitous group of haemotrophic bacteria that infect a broad range of mammalian hosts including, occasionally, humans (Weinman, 1935
, 1944
; Kreier et al., 1992
; Neimark et al., 2001
). E. coccoides, like most members of the group, is vector-transmitted and produces a primary acute infection which is followed by a persistent latent infection. Diagnosis has been made by detecting organisms on erythrocytes in Romanowsky-type or acridine orange-stained blood smears.
For decades the widespread occurrence of E. coccoides in laboratory mouse colonies, mouse tumour lines and protozoa research stocks was an unrecognized and serious problem because inapparent infections invalidated the results of numerous studies (Eliot, 1936
; Gledhill, 1962
; Riley et al., 1964
; Baker et al., 1971
).
E. coccoides was thought to be a rickettsia because of its obligate parasitism, small size and filterability, erythrocyte localization and arthropod vector transmission. E. coccoides, together with a number of similar haemotrophic bacteria, was classified in the order Rickettsiales, family Anaplasmataceae (Kreier & Ristic, 1984
; Kreier et al., 1981
, 1992
). Recently, phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences from several of these bacteria has demonstrated that these uncultivated wall-less bacteria are not rickettsia, but instead are mycoplasmas (Rikihisa et al., 1997
; Neimark & Kocan, 1997
; Neimark et al., 2001
, 2002b
). In addition, several new haemotrophic Mycoplasma species have been identified in wild and domesticated animals (Messick et al., 2002
; Neimark et al., 2002b
, 2004
). Here we show that E. coccoides also is a Mycoplasma. Because numerous natural infections have been observed in a laboratory setting and this organism has been the subject of much research, considerable information exists. Consequently, this organism provides a general model to guide studies of haemotrophic mycoplasmas, particularly the pathogenic species that similarly produce chronic latent infections.
PCR amplification, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, sequence analysis and phylogenetic tree construction
Blood from mice infected with E. coccoides was collected with heparin and diluted 1 : 3 in Alsever's/glycerol solution and cryopreserved at 70 °C. The blood was thawed and 0·2 ml inoculated by the intraperitoneal route into Eperythrozoon-free, random-bred, albino Swiss mice that had been inoculated 2 days earlier with Plasmodium yoelii strain NS1100. By 2 days after the E. coccoides inoculation, there was a heavy E. coccoides infection and blood samples were collected in acid/citrate/dextrose and approximately 50 µl applied to FTA filter papers (treated filter paper for collecting and storage of blood or other biological samples for subsequent DNA analysis; Fitzco), air-dried and stored at ambient temperature until processed. Three-millimetre-diameter circles were punched from the filters and each circle was transferred to a PCR tube, washed at room temperature three times with 500 µl of FTA Purification Reagent (Fitzco) for 10 min each, and then washed twice with 500 µl of TE (10 mM Tris, 1 mM disodium EDTA, pH 8·0) for 10 min each and air-dried. The E. coccoides 16S rRNA gene was amplified, and the gene sequence was determined with 16S rRNA gene primers as described previously (Neimark & Kocan, 1997
; Neimark et al., 2002a
). Comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of E. coccoides to the GenBank database using BLASTN showed that the highest similarity scores matched to haemotrophic mycoplasmas.
Mycoplasma 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from GenBank. Alignments were made with the program CLUSTAL W, adjusted manually, and phylogenetic analysis of the sequence alignment was carried out with the phylogenetic program package PHYLIP 3.51c as described preciously (Neimark & Kocan, 1997
; Neimark et al., 2002a
). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method corrected for nucleotide substitutions by the Kimura two-parameter option with the transition/transversion ratio set at 2.The dataset was resampled 1000 times and the resulting bootstrap percentage values are indicated at the nodes of the tree shown in Fig. 1
.
|
The high bootstrap percentage values at most of the branch points in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1
) indicate the probability that this is a robust tree. However, the few low bootstrap values (values below 50) at some branch points suggest these branches may be due to chance. The phylogenetic tree shows that E. coccoides (Mycoplasma coccoides comb. nov.) falls in the haemofelis cluster of the haemoplasmas where it is related to, but is clearly distinct from, Mycoplasma haemomuris (85 % similarity), a more pathogenic epierythrocytic mycoplasma found in laboratory rats and mice and in wild mice. Serum from mice infected with E. coccoides has been reported to react with Haemobartonella muris (M. haemomuris) and Anaplasma marginale antigens (Wigand, 1958
). It is interesting to note that these two rodent mycoplasmas cluster phylogenetically with Mycoplasma haemofelis, a parasite of cats, which are rodent predators.
E. coccoides was first identified in laboratory mice (Schilling, 1928
; Dinger, 1928
) but wild mice probably are natural hosts (Bruymoghe & Vassiliadis, 1929a
, b
), and rats and rabbits have been infected experimentally (Bruymoghe & Vassiliadis, 1929c
; Eliot & Ford, 1930
). Natural infections with E. coccoides are transmitted by adults and nymphs of the lice Polypax spinulosa (Eliot,1936
) and Polyplax serrata, which can transmit an infection after fasting for as long as 24 h (Weinman, 1944
; Berkenkamp & Wescott, 1988
); there is no evidence of E. coccoides replication in lice and transmission appears to be mechanical. Fleas, the rat louse and the mites Myobia musculi, Mycoptes musculinus or Radfordia affinis are not vectors (Eliot, 1936
; Berkenkamp & Wescott, 1988
). Experimental infections are produced usually by intravenous or intraperitoneal inoculation of infected blood and by oral administration of citrated blood but attempts at transmission by smearing mucous membranes (eyes, nostrils and urogenital surfaces) with citrated blood were not successful (Thurston, 1955
).
Infections produce an intense parasitaemia that peaks on day 2 to 5 (Thurston, 1955
; Gledhill et al., 1965a
; Peters, 1965
; Ott et al., 1967
; Glasgow et al., 1971
, 1974
) when the number of organisms can exceed 109 (ml blood)1 (Stansly & Neilson, 1965
). Subsequently, the parasitaemia declines rapidly so by day 6 or 7 the number of organisms in the peripheral circulation is very low and organisms may go undetected in blood smears unless they are specifically searched for. The acute phase displays a haemolytic anaemia with the haematocrit falling from 5055 % to 2030 % but by day 8 haematocrit levels return to the normal range (Glasgow et al., 1971
). A marked splenomegaly is a characteristic of the infection and there is a general lymphadenopathy (Marmorston, 1935
; Ansari et al., 1963
; Riley, 1964
). There are no obvious clinical symptoms and mortality is rare.
A latent infection ensues which persists for months and possibly for the life of the animal but there is no recognizable disease. Splenomegaly also persists in carrier mice presumably as long as they are infected (Baker et al., 1971
) and low numbers of organisms may appear sporadically for brief periods in the peripheral blood of chronic carriers (Thurston, 1955
). The existence of a latent infection is usually revealed by splenectomy which results in the reappearance of large numbers of organisms in the peripheral blood within 48 h; lower numbers of organisms then persist in the peripheral blood for several months (Schilling, 1928
; Eliot & Ford, 1930
; McCluskie & Niven, 1934
; Marmorston, 1935
; Thurston, 1954
, 1955
).
A notable finding is that E. coccoides infection raised phagocytic activity far above normal (Gledhill et al., 1965a
). Also, there is a marked suppression of the interferon response (by 80 to 95 %) beginning 48 to 72 h after infection and continuing for 3 to 4 weeks (Glasgow et al., 1971
, 1974
). The capacity to produce interferon returned to normal by 6 weeks (Glasgow et al., 1971
, 1974
), so the interferon suppression lasted from about the end of the acute phase through the early latent phase. This response differs from a transient interferon response caused by E. coccoides infection (Glasgow et al., 1971
; Suntharasamai & Rytel, 1973
) that was probably due to release of pre-formed interferon (Glasgow et al., 1971
).
Treatments that damage or stress the reticuloendothelial system (RES), such as X-irradiation, activated latent infection and in some instances infections were fatal (Furth, cited by Marmorston, 1935
). Inoculating latently infected mice with Borrelia recurrentis or Trypanosoma lewisi (Dinger, 1929
), malaria (Thurston, 1955
; Ott et al., 1967
) or lymphocytic leukaemia cells (Marmorston, 1935
) activated latent infection. Also, chemical agents, such as ethyl palmitate, which damage the spleen are known to activate latent infection in other haemoplasmas (Finch & Jonas, 1973
).
During the acute phase infection there is a clear temporal relationship between the rapid disappearance of organisms from the blood and the rise of antibody (Hyde et al., 1972
; Glasgow et al., 1974
). In spite of this relationship, it is a question whether neutralizing antibody has a major part in maintaining latency since splenectomy results in rapid reappearance of organisms in the peripheral circulation. Although host defences contain the infection, there is a standoff between the host and the parasite: the host suppresses the parasitaemia and is resistant to superinfection (Thurston, 1955
; Glasgow et al., 1974
), yet the host is not able to eliminate the organisms and the infection persists.
Undetected E. coccoides infections in laboratory mouse colonies, mouse tumour lines and related materials have resulted in numerous cases of anomalous experimental findings and led to recognition that E. coccoides can cause complex pathophysiological changes that affect the host response to infection and that concurrent infections with E. coccoides and another infectious agent can markedly alter the course of infection. Examples include conversion of the benign hepatitis produced by mouse hepatitis virus MHV1 to a fatal infection by a concurrent infection with E. coccoides (Niven et al., 1952
; Gledhill, 1956
, 1962
; Seamer, 1967
); the increase in mortality from lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection in mice concurrently infected with E. coccoides (Seamer et al., 1961
; Seamer & Gledhill, 1965
; Niven, 1971
); the spleen weight increase factor and other effects encountered during tumour transmission studies in mice (Nelson, 1956
; Stansly, 1965
; Stansly & Neilson, 1965
, 1966a
, b
); the discovery of the lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (Arison et al., 1963
; Riley, 1964
, Riley et al., 1964
; Fitzmaurice et al., 1972
); and the discovery that E. coccoides infection increased the virulence of Salmonella typhimurium because normally harmless amounts of endotoxin produced high mortality in E. coccoides-infected mice (Gledhill & Niven, 1957
; Niven, 1971
).
In contrast, Peters (1965
, 1987)
showed that concurrent infections with E. coccoides and Plasmodium berghei resulted in a plasmodistatic effect that permitted longer survival of mice. Analogous effects were found with E. coccoides and additional plasmodia (Ott & Stauber, 1967
; Ott et al., 1967
; Voller & Bidwell, 1968
; Cox, 1975
; Suntharasamai & Marsden, 1969
, 1970
), with Babesia rodhaini (Peters, 1965
) and Trypanosoma brucei (Bidwell & Voller, 1967
). Also, E. coccoides protected mice from the lethal effects of Simliki Forest virus (Voller & Bidwell, 1968
).
Finerty et al. (1973)
showed that concurrent E. coccoides infection reduced the antibody response of mice to P. berghei and suggested antigenic competition could be responsible for this effect. Subsequently, Ljungström et al. (1974)
showed that mice with an E. coccoides acute infection or inapparent chronic infection when immunized with sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) had enhanced IgM plaque-forming capacity (acutely infected mice also had enhanced IgG capacity); however, they noted the possibility could not be excluded that the increase in plaque capacity was due to cross-reactivity between SRBCs and an E. coccoides antigen.
The question has been raised as to whether some animal mycoplasmas, such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, which can attach to erythrocytes in vitro and are known to enter the blood circulation can also attach to erythrocytes in vivo (Neimark et al., 2001
). Mucous membranes are the primary tissue habitat for animal mycoplasmas but whether haemotrophic mycoplasmas can also colonize mucous membranes is unknown.
E. coccoides has not been cultivated on artificial media. Derrick et al. (1954)
found E. coccoides survived up to 9 days in embryonated chicken eggs but attempts at passage were unsuccessful; serial passages in embryonated chicken eggs have been reported (Seamer, 1959
) but not confirmed. The standard procedure for determining whether a mouse colony was infected was to splenectomize a dozen 3- to 4-month-old mice and examine their blood daily (Gledhill et al., 1965b
). An indirect fluorescent-antibody test has been shown to be useful (Baker et al., 1971
) and scanning electron microscopy has been suggested to be useful (Augsten, 1982
) but a PCR assay would be preferred, especially for studies of latency.
E. coccoides is readily killed by antiseptics and various chemical agents (Thurston,1955
; Stansly & Neilson, 1966b
). The organism, like all mycoplasmas, is completely resistant to penicillin and other antimicrobial agents that target the cell wall. Tetracycline treatment is effective in reducing the number of organisms in the peripheral circulation but, based on experience with other haemoplasmas, this antibiotic probably does not eradicate the organism from infected animals. Organic arsenicals have been shown to be effective for treating E. coccoides (Bruymoghe & Vassiliadis, 1929b
) and Neoarsphenamine (300 µg per 20 g mouse) eradicated active and latent infections in mice (Thurston, 1953
); these drugs have proved generally useful for haemoplasma infections (Michel et al., 2000
).
It is proposed that E. coccoides be transferred to the genus Mycoplasma as Mycoplasma coccoides comb. nov., with the specific epithet coccoides retained for continuity. Because this proposed transfer raises the taxonomic problems described below, we submit a Request for an Opinion of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and ask (i) the current use of the genus name Mycoplasma be maintained and (ii) Mycoplasma coccoides be considered a legitimate name.
(i) Eperythrozoon (Schilling, 1928
) predates Mycoplasma (Nowak, 1929
), consequently under Rules 15, 17, 44 and 51b the name of the united genus should be Eperythrozoon. We request an exception to the rules that would require renaming Mycoplasma species to Eperythrozoon, since changing the names of more than 100 Mycoplasma species to Eperythrozoon (as well as changing the order and family names from Mycoplasmatales and Mycoplasmataceae) would produce enormous confusion. In support of this request we cite Appendix 8 which states In those cases where strict adherence to the rules of nomenclature would produce confusion or would not result in nomenclatural stability, exceptions to the rules may be requested of the Judicial Commission of the ICSB. With respect to confusion, it should be noted that over the past few years the transfer of the five other Eperythrozoon and Haemobartonella species to the genus Mycoplasma and the naming of several newly discovered haemotrophic bacteria as Mycoplasma has been well accepted and appears to have caused no confusion among veterinarians, the community most affected.
In addition, transferring all Mycoplasma species to Eperythrozoon would produce perilous names (Rule 56a). Problems could arise with mycoplasmas that cause serious human disease and because some animal pathogenic mycoplasmas are subject to quarantine regulations, changing their names would require name changes in quarantine regulations and documents around the world.
When the genus name Eperythrozoon was created with Eperythrozoon coccoides in 1928, there were no molecular identification or electron microscopic methods so it is not surprising that investigators did not recognize the fundamental characters shared by this bacterium and the bovine pleuropneumonia organism, then already known for more than 30 years, and the mycoplasma causing contagious agalactiae identified 3 years earlier. The incorrect identification of this and other haemotrophic mycoplasmas as rickettsia (the genera Eperythrozoon and Haemobartonella) has long caused misunderstanding, so it is especially important that their genus name clearly convey their phylogenetic affiliation within the family Mycoplasmataceae.
(ii) Although E. coccoides clearly is a Mycoplasma, according to the Rules of the Bacteriological Code, the new combination Mycoplasma coccoides is illegitimate because E. coccoides is the type species of the genus Eperythrozoon. Ideally, this particular problem could be ameliorated by including in the proposed transfer the last remaining named species in the genus, Eperythrozoon parvum (all the other recognized species in the genus have been shown to be Mycoplasma species). However, this uncultured organism is not available and there is no assurance it can be found in a reasonable amount of time since one of us (H. N.) has been searching for a specimen for some years without success (requests to veterinary colleagues in North America and Europe to take a specimen if they encounter an infected pig have not resulted in any specimens). Except for three early papers on E. parvum 40 to 50 years ago, there has been only one other paper on this organism, nearly 25 years ago, and the description in Bergey's Manual is quite limited. Since all the other species of Haemobartonella and Eperythrozoon in Bergey's have now been shown to be Mycoplasma species, it seems likely E. parvum would prove to be a mycoplasma but there is no direct evidence and it cannot be determined when a specimen of this bacterium cannot be found and studied.
[After this manuscript was originally submitted we were advised to add a Request for an Opinion concerning these problems. As the revised manuscript was being submitted, Uilenberg et al. (2004)
proposed on the basis of priority that all Mycoplasma species should be renamed Eperythrozoon but at the same time proposed waving the requirement that the order (Mycoplasmatales) and the family (Mycoplasmataceae) names be changed.]
Description of Mycoplasma coccoides comb. nov.
Mycoplasma coccoides (coc.coi'des. Gr. n. coccus a berry; N.L. n. coccus a coccus; Gr. n. eidus shape; N.L. adj. coccoides coccus-shaped).
Basonym: Eperythrozoon coccoides Schilling 1928
(Approved Lists 1980).
Organisms in peripheral blood are coccoid and about 350 nm in diameter. Their association with the erythrocyte does not produce a noticeable indentation in the erythrocyte surface (Tanaka et al., 1965
). Many organisms also are free in the plasma, especially early in the infection. Ring-shaped cells commonly observed in stained smears are an artefact of the staining process which suggests these organisms are easily deformed from their coccoid form. The cells are filterable through at least a 360 nm mean pore size colloidon filter (Niven et al., 1952
). An epierythrocytic parasite of laboratory and wild mice, albino rats, hamsters and rabbits. Organic arsenicals (Neoarsphenamine; Oxophenarsine) are effective therapeutic agents that can eradicate a latent infection (Thurston, 1953
; Thompson & Bayles, 1966
; Powers et al., 1969
); tetracyclines only suppress infection. The organism can influence the course of viral or protozoan infection in experimentally co-infected mice. Reported from Europe, North and South America and Africa. The louse Polypax spinulosa is a vector. The organism has not been cultured on artificial media. Organisms in citrated blood remain infective for several hours at 16 °C and approximately 11 days at 3 °C (Thurston, 1955
) and are maintained by animal passage, and storage at 70 °C. DNA G+C content (mol%) not determined. Genome size not determined.
Because this bacterium is uncultivated, no type strain is established. However, it is suggested that, where possible, chromosomal DNA from this and other uncultivated bacteria be deposited in a type culture collection to provide a type strain reference.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dr J. P. Euzéby and a journal referee for helpful taxonomic advice.
REFERENCES
Ansari, K. A., Neilson, C. F. & Stansly, P. G. (1963). Pathogenesis of infectious splenic enlargement in mice. Exp Mol Pathol 2, 6168.[CrossRef][Medline]
Arison, R. N., Cassaro, J. A. & Shonk, C. E. (1963). Factors which affect plasma lactic dehydrogenase in tumor bearing mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 113, 497501.
Augsten, K. (1982). Identification of Eperythrozoon coccoides by scanning electron microscope. Z Versuchstierkd 24, 169170.[Medline]
Baker, H. J., Cassell, G. H. & Lindsey, J. R. (1971). Research complications due to Haemobartonella and Eperythrozoon infections in experimental animals. Am J Pathol 64, 625632.[Medline]
Berkenkamp, S. D. & Wescott, R. B. (1988). Arthropod transmission of Eperythrozoon coccoides in mice. Lab Anim Sci 38, 398401.[Medline]
Bidwell, D. E. & Voller, A. (1967). The effect of Eperythrozoon coccoides on infections in mice. Parasitology 57, 22P.[Medline]
Bruymoghe, R. & Vassiliadis, P. C. (1929a). L'Eperythrozoaire coccoides. Compt Rend Soc Biol Paris 100, 763764 (in French).
Bruymoghe, R. & Vassiliadis, P. C. (1929b). Contribution a l'Étude des Eperythrozoaire coccoides. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 7, 353364 (in French).
Bruymoghe, R. & Vassiliadis, P. C. (1929c). Transmission des eperythrozoaires de la souris. Compt Rend Soc Biol Paris 102, 939940 (in French).
Cox, F. E. (1975). Factors affecting infections of mammals with intraerythrocytic protozoa. Symp Soc Exp Biol 29, 429451.
Derrick, E. H., Pope, J. H., Chong, S. K., Carley, J. G. & Lee, P. E. (1954). Observations on infection of mice with Eperythrozoon coccoides Schilling. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 23, 577582.
Dinger, J. E. (1928). Een nieuw microorganisme bij muizen. Nederl Tidjs v Geneesk 82, 59035905 (in Dutch).
Dinger, J. E. (1929). Näheres über das Eperythrozoon coccoides. Zentralbl Bakteriol Abt I Orig 113, 503510 (in German).
Eliot, C. P. (1936). The insect vector for the natural transmission Eperythrozoon coccoides in mice. Science 84, 397.
Eliot, C. P. & Ford, W. W. (1930). Eperythrozoon coccoides in mice. Am J Hyg 12, 677680.
Finch, S. C. & Jonas, A. M. (1973). Ethyl palmitate-induced bartonellosis as an index of functional splenic ablation. J Reticuloendothel Soc 13, 2026.[Medline]
Finerty, J. F., Evans, C. B. & Hyde, C. L. (1973). Plasmodium berghei and Eperythrozoon coccoides: antibody and immunoglobulin synthesis in germfree and conventional mice simultaneously infected. Exp Parasitol 34, 7684.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fitzmaurice, M. A., Riley, V. & Santisteban, G. A. (1972). Biological synergism between the LDH-virus and Eperythrozoon coccoides: studies on the mechanism. Pathol Biol (Paris) 20, 743750.[Medline]
Glasgow, L. A., Odugbemi, T., Dwyer, P. & Ritterson, A. L. (1971). Eperythrozoon coccoides. I. Effect on the interferon response in mice. Infect Immun 4, 425430.
Glasgow, L. A., Murrer, A. T. & Lombardi, P. S. (1974). Eperythrozoon coccoides. II. Effect on interferon production and role of humoral antibody in host resistance. Infect Immun 9, 266272.
Gledhill, A. W. (1956). Quantitative aspects of the enhancing action of Eperythrozoa on the pathogenicity of mouse hepatitis virus. J Gen Microbiol 15, 292304.[Medline]
Gledhill, A. W. & Niven, J. S. (1957). The toxicity of some bacterial filtrates for mice pre-infected with Eperythrozoon coccoides. Br J Exp Pathol 38, 284290.[Medline]
Gledhill, A. W. (1962). Viral diseases in laboratory animals. In Problems of Laboratory Animal Disease, pp. 99113. Edited by R. J. C. Harris. New York: Academic Press.
Gledhill, A. W. (1965). Quantitative aspects of the enhancing action of eperythrozoa on the pathogenicity of mouse hepatitis virus. J Gen Microbiol 15, 292304.
Gledhill, A. W., Bilbey, D. L. & Niven, J. S. (1965a). Effect of certain murine pathogens on phagocytic activity. Br J Exp Pathol 46, 433442.[Medline]
Gledhill, A. W., Niven, J. S. & Seamer, J. (1965b). Elimination of Eperythrozoon coccoides infection from mouse colonies. J Hyg (Lond) 63, 7378.[Medline]
Hyde, C. L., Finerty, J. F. & Evans, C. B. (1972). Antibody and immunoglobulin synthesis in germfree and conventional mice infected with Eperythrozoon coccoides. Am J Trop Med Hyg 21, 506511.
Johansson, K. E., Tully, J. G., Bolske, G. & Pettersson, B. (1999). Mycoplasma cavipharyngis and Mycoplasma fastidiosum, the closest relatives to Eperythrozoon spp. and Haemobartonella spp. FEMS Microbiol Lett 174, 321326.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kreier, J. P. & Ristic, M. (1984). Genus III. Haemobartonella Tyzzer and Weinman 1939, 143AL; Genus IV. Eperythrozoon Schilling 1928
, 1854AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systsematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, pp. 724729. Edited by N. R. Krieg & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Kreier, J. P., Dominquez, N., Krampitz, H. E., Gothe, R. & Ristic, M. (1981). The haemotrophic bacteria: the families Bartonellaceae and Anaplasmataceae. In The Prokaryotes, vol. 2, pp. 21892209. Edited by M. P. Starr, H. Stolp, H. G. Trüper, A. Balows & H. G. Schlegel. Berlin: Springer.
Kreier, J. P., Gothe, R., Ihler, G. M., Krampitz, H. E., Mernaugh, G. & Palmer, G. H. (1992). The haemotrophic bacteria: the families Bartonellaceae and Anaplasmataceae. In The Prokaryotes, vol. 4, pp. 39944022. Edited by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K.-H. Schleifer. Berlin: Springer.
Ljungström, I., Huldt, G. & Voller, A. (1974). The effect of Eperythrozoon coccoides infection on the number of plaque forming cells in mice. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [B] Microbiol Immunol 82, 911913.[Medline]
Marmorston, J. (1935). Effect of splenectomy on a latent infection, Eperythrozoon coccoides in white mice. J Infect Dis 56, 142152.
McCluskie, J. A. W. & Niven, J. S. F. (1934). The blood changes in rats and mice after splenectomy with observations in Bartonella muris and Eperythrozoon coccoides. J Pathol Bacteriol 39, 185196.[CrossRef]
Messick, J. B., Walker, P. G., Raphael, W., Berent, L. & Shi, X. (2002). Candidatus Mycoplasma haemodidelphidis' sp. nov., Candidatus Mycoplasma haemolamae sp. nov. and Mycoplasma haemocanis comb. nov., haemotrophic parasites from a naturally infected opossum (Didelphis virginiana), alpaca (Lama pacos) and dog (Canis familiaris): phylogenetic and secondary structural relatedness of their 16S rRNA genes to other mycoplasmas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 693698.[Abstract]
Michel, J. C., de Thoisy, B. & Contamin, H. (2000). Chemotherapy of haemobartonellosis in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Med Primatol 29, 8587.[CrossRef][Medline]
Neimark, H. & Kocan, K. M. (1997). The cell wall-less rickettsia Eperythrozoon wenyonii is a mycoplasma. FEMS Microbiol Lett 156, 287291.[CrossRef][Medline]
Neimark, H., Johansson, K.-E., Rikihisa, Y. & Tully, J. G. (2001). Proposal to transfer some members of the genera Haemobartonella and Eperythrozoon to the genus Mycoplasma with descriptions of Candidatus Mycoplasma haemofelis, Candidatus Mycoplasma haemomuris, Candidatus Mycoplasma haemosuis' and Candidatus Mycoplasma wenyonii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 891899.[Abstract]
Neimark, H., Barnaud, A., Gounon, P., Michel, J. C. & Contamin, H. (2002a). The putative haemobartonella that influences Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia in squirrel monkeys is a haemotrophic mycoplasma. Microbes Infect 4, 693698.[CrossRef][Medline]
Neimark, H., Johansson, K.-E., Rikihisa, Y. & Tully, J. G. (2002b). Revision of haemotrophic Mycoplasma species names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 683.[Abstract]
Neimark, H., Hoff, B. & Ganter, M. (2004). Mycoplasma ovis comb. nov. (formerly Eperythrozoon ovis), an epierythrocytic agent of haemolytic anaemia in sheep and goats. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 365371.
Nelson, J. B. (1956). An ascites tumor appearing during the passage of Eperythrozoon coccoides in mice. J Exp Med 103, 743752.
Niven, J. S. F. (1971). Alan Watson Gledhill. 4 June 191020 July 1967. J Med Microbiol 4, 389404.[Medline]
Niven, J. S. F., Gledhill, A. W., Dick, G. W. A. & Andrews, C. H. (1952). Further light on mouse hepatitis. Lancet 2, 1061.[Medline]
Nowak, J. (1929). Morphologie, nature et cycle évolutif du microbe de la péripneuminie des bovidés. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 43, 13301352 (in French).
Ott, K. J. & Stauber, L. A. (1967). Eperythrozoon coccoides: influence on course of infection of Plasmodium chabaudi in mouse. Science 155, 15461548.
Ott, K. J., Astin, J. K. & Stauber, L. A. (1967). Eperythrozoon coccoides and rodent malaria: Plasmodium chabaudi and Plasmodium berghei. Exp Parasitol 21, 6877.[CrossRef][Medline]
Peters, W. (1965). Competitive relationship between Eperythrozoon coccoides and Plasmodium berghei in the mouse. Exp Parasitol 16, 158166.[CrossRef][Medline]
Peters, W. (1987). Chemotherapy and Drug Resistance in Malaria, 2nd edn, vol. 1. London: Academic Press.
Powers, K. G., Jacobs, R. L., Good, W. C. & Koontz, L. C. (1969). Plasmodium vinckei: production of chloroquine-resistant strain. Exp Parasitol 26, 193202.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rikihisa, Y., Kawahara, M., Wen, B., Kociba, G., Fuerst, P., Kawamori, F., Suto, C., Shibata, S. & Futohashi, M. (1997). Western immunoblot analysis of Haemobartonella muris and comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of H. muris, H. felis, and Eperythrozoon suis. J Clin Microbiol 35, 823829.[Abstract]
Riley, V. (1964). Synergism between a lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus and Eperythrozoon coccoides. Science 146, 921923.
Riley, V., Loveless, J. D. & Fitzmaurice, M. A. (1964). Comparison of a lactate dehydrogenase elevating viruslike agent and Eperythrozoon coccoides. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 116, 486490.
Schilling, V. (1928). Eperythrozoon coccoides, eine neue durch Splenektomie aktivierbare Dauerinfektion der weissen Maus. Klin Wschr 7, 18531855 (in German).[CrossRef]
Seamer, J. (1959). The propagation and preservation of Eperythrozoon coccoides. J Gen Microbiol 21, 344351.[Medline]
Seamer, J. (1967). Some virus infections of mice. In Pathology of Laboratory Rats and Mice, pp. 537567. Edited by E. Cotchin & F. J. C. Roe. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
Seamer, J., Gledhill, A. W., Barlow, J. L. & Hotchin, J. (1961). Effect of Eperythrozoon coccoides upon lymphocytic choriomeningitis in mice. J Immunol 86, 512515.
Stansly, P. G. (1965). Non-oncogenic infectious agents associated with experimental tumors. Prog Exp Tumor Res 7, 224258.[Medline]
Stansly, P. G. & Neilson, C. F. (1965). Relationship between spleen weight increase factor (SWIF) of mice and Eperythrozoon coccoides. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 119, 10591063.[Medline]
Stansly, P. G. & Neilson, C. F. (1966a). Distinctive behaviour of Eperythrozoon coccoides in plasma and spleen of infected mice. Nature 211, 12031204.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stansly, P. G. & Neilson, C. F. (1966b). Sedimentation of Eperythrozoon coccoides. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 121, 363365.[Medline]
Suntharasamai, P. & Marsden, P. D. (1969). Studies of splenomegaly in rodent malaria. I. The course of splenomegaly in mice infected with Eperythrozoon coccoides, Plasmodium berghei yoelii and the two infections combined. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 63, 6470.[CrossRef][Medline]
Suntharasamai, P. & Marsden, P. D. (1970). The effect of Eperythrozoon coccoides infection or splenectomy, or both, on the infection with a Peru strain of Trypanosoma cruzi in mice. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 64, 167.
Suntharasamai, P. & Rytel, M. W. (1973). Interferon response and interferon action in Eperythrozoon coccoides infection of mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 142, 811816.[Medline]
Tanaka, H., Hall, W. T., Sheffield, J. B. & Moore, D. H. (1965). Fine structure of Haemobartonella muris as compared with Eperythrozoon coccoides and Mycoplasma pulmonis. J Bacteriol 90, 17351749.
Thompson, P. E. & Bayles, A. (1966). Eradication of Eperythrozoon coccoides with oxophenarsine in normal and drug-resistant lines of Plasmodium berghei in mice. J Parasitol 52, 674678.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thurston, J. P. (1953). The chemotherapy of Eperythrozoon coccoides (Schilling, 1928
). Parasitology 43, 170174.[Medline]
Thurston, J. P. (1954). Anaemia in mice caused by Eperythrozoon coccoides (Schilling, 1928
). Parasitology 44, 8198.[Medline]
Thurston, J. P. (1955). Observations on the course of Eperythrozoon coccoides infections in mice, and the sensitivity of the parasite to external agents. Parasitology 45, 141151.[Medline]
Uilenberg, G., Thiaucourt, F. & Jongejan, F. (2004). On molecular taxonomy: what is in a name? Exp Appl Acarol 32, 301312.[CrossRef][Medline]
Voller, A. & Bidwell, D. E. (1968). The effect of Eperythrozoon coccoides infection in mice on super-imposed Plasmodium chabaudi and Semliki Forest Virus infections. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 62, 342348.[Medline]
Weinman, D. (1935). Les Parasites Érythrocytaires Révélés par la Splénectomie: Bartonella et Epérythrozoon. Paris: Amédée Legrand (in French).
Weinman, D. (1944). Infectious anemias due to Bartonella and related red cell parasites. Trans Am Philos Soc 33, 288338, 350.
Wigand, R. (1958). Morphologische, Biologische und Serologische Eigenschaften der Bartonellen. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme (in German).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Uilenberg, F. Thiaucourt, and F. Jongejan Mycoplasma and Eperythrozoon (Mycoplasmataceae). Comments on a recent paper Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, January 1, 2006; 56(1): 13 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |