IJSEM IJSEM eTOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korczak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnert, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korczak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnert, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Korczak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnert, P.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54 (2004), 1393-1399; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.03043-0
© 2004 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae based on rpoB sequences

Bozena Korczak1, Henrik Christensen2, Stefan Emler3, Joachim Frey1 and Peter Kuhnert1

1 Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
3 SmartGene GmbH, PSE-C EPFL-Ecublens, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Correspondence
Peter Kuhnert
peter.kuhnert{at}vbi.unibe.ch


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Sequences of the gene encoding the {beta}-subunit of the RNA polymerase (rpoB) were used to delineate the phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae. A total of 72 strains, including the type strains of the major described species as well as selected field isolates, were included in the study. Selection of universal rpoB-derived primers for the family allowed straightforward amplification and sequencing of a 560 bp fragment of the rpoB gene. In parallel, 16S rDNA was sequenced from all strains. The phylogenetic tree obtained with the rpoB sequences reflected the major branches of the tree obtained with the 16S rDNA, especially at the genus level. Only a few discrepancies between the trees were observed. In certain cases the rpoB phylogeny was in better agreement with DNA–DNA hybridization studies than the phylogeny derived from 16S rDNA. The rpoB gene is strongly conserved within the various species of the family of Pasteurellaceae. Hence, rpoB gene sequence analysis in conjunction with 16S rDNA sequencing is a valuable tool for phylogenetic studies of the Pasteurellaceae and may also prove useful for reorganizing the current taxonomy of this bacterial family.


Published online ahead of print on 13 February 2004 as DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.03043-0.

The GenBank accession numbers for the novel 16S rDNA and rpoB gene sequences of Pasteurellaceae species used in this study are given in Figs 1 and 2GoGo.

A similarity matrix of the rpoB sequences for all the strains investigated in this study is shown as supplementary data in IJSEM Online.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
The family Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981Go currently comprises 57 named bacterial species which have been isolated from man and various animals. The three genera Haemophilus, Actinobacillus and Pasteurella which originally formed the family have recently been joined by new genera, the most prominent being Mannheimia, which contains the species Mannheimia haemolytica (formerly Pasteurella haemolytica) (Angen et al., 1999Go). Three genera are currently formed by single species, these are Phocoenobacter uteri (Foster et al., 2000Go), Lonepinella koalarum (Osawa et al., 1995Go) and Histophilus somni (Angen et al., 2003Go). The latter genus has been proposed to include the three species incertae sedisHaemophilus somnus’, ‘Haemophilus agni and ‘Histophilus ovis’. Finally, Christensen et al. (2003a)Go have described the genus Gallibacterium, which currently consists of one species and one genomospecies.

Members of the Pasteurellaceae are generally isolated from mucosal membranes and tissue of birds, turtles and mammals, including man. They show a strong host association and have probably co-evolved with their corresponding hosts (Bisgaard, 1993Go). While most of the species are commensals, there are a few that act as pathogens (Olsen et al., 2004Go). These include the human pathogens Haemophilus influenzae, which causes neonatal meningitis and otitis media, and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, which causes juvenile periodontitis. Important animal diseases are caused, for example, by M. haemolytica (shipping fever of cattle), Pasteurella multocida (atrophic rhinitis in swine and fowl cholera) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (pleuropneumonia in pigs). In many of the pathogenic species of Pasteurellaceae, specific toxins belonging to the RTX toxin family are found (Frey & Kuhnert, 2002Go). These toxins are often associated with specifically pathogenic isolates and seem to determine to some extent the host range of the pathogen (Lally et al., 1994Go; Kuhnert et al., 2003bGo). They are mainly absent in non-pathogenic strains.

The taxonomy of Pasteurellaceae is not well settled and is under continuous revision. The taxonomy has involved mainly phenotypic characterization, including the determination of polyamine patterns (Olsen et al., 2004Go; Busse et al., 1997Go). A few thorough studies have also been carried out at the genotypic level. Whole genome DNA–DNA hybridizations were carried out some time ago on Pasteurellaceae (Mutters et al., 1984Go, 1985Go) and genetic relatedness was investigated by DNA–rRNA hybridization (De Ley et al., 1990Go). Dewhirst et al. (1992Go, 1993)Go investigated the phylogenetic relationships within the family by 16S rDNA sequence comparisons and a full phylogenetic tree has been published recently (Christensen et al., 2003bGo). Hedegaard et al. (2001)Go used infB sequences to investigate in more detail the genetic relationships of the genus Haemophilus. However, other phylogenetic marker genes are needed to clarify the taxonomy within the Pasteurellaceae, to provide additional tools for genetic identification and to give insight into the evolution of this group of bacteria. The rpoB gene has been used successfully for the elaboration of phylogenetic relationships in several groups of bacteria, and normally has a higher discriminatory power than 16S rDNA sequences (Mollet et al., 1997Go; Dahllof et al., 2000Go). Besides the use of partial rpoB sequences for delineating phylogenetic relationships (Mollet et al., 1998Go; Taillardat-Bisch et al., 2003Go) the gene has also been applied for improving diagnostics (Drancourt & Raoult, 2002Go; Ko et al., 2003Go). Recently, the usefulness of rpoB for the description of Histophilus somni was shown (Angen et al., 2003Go). In this paper we describe the phylogeny of the entire family of Pasteurellaceae based on a universal amplification and sequencing approach of rpoB.

Based on sequence comparison analysis we have chosen the primers Pasrpob-L (5'-GCAGTGAAAGARTTCTTTGGTTC) and Rpob-R (5'-GTTGCATGTTNGNACCCAT) for amplification of a 560 bp fragment from the rpoB gene, corresponding to positions 1501–2059 of the Escherichia coli rpoB gene. PCR amplification was performed in 50 µl containing 20 pmol each primer, 1 mM dNTPs, Taq buffer and 2·5 U Taq polymerase (Roche Life Sciences). Template DNA was added as purified genomic DNA, as crude lysate or directly from bacterial colonies. Cycling conditions on a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) were 3 min denaturation at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s. A final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min was included to finish the PCR amplification. After purification of the PCR product with a HighPure PCR purification kit (Roche Life Sciences), about 20–30 ng PCR product was used for sequencing with the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) using Pasrpob-L and Rpob-R as sequencing primers. Sequencing products were analysed on an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and edited using the program Sequencher (GeneCode, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). In parallel to the rpoB sequences, the 16S rDNA sequence of each strain was determined as described previously (Kuhnert et al., 1996Go, 2002Go), in order to confirm the species identity and improve available sequences. If the 16S rDNA sequence was better than the one publicly available (i.e. unknown bases were resolved) it was deposited as a new entry in GenBank. The strains used in this study and the accession numbers of the corresponding rpoB and 16S rDNA sequences are given in the figures. Phylogenetic analysis was done using the program Bionumerics version 3.0 (Applied Maths). The primers used for amplifying and sequencing the partial rpoB gene from Pasteurellaceae proved to be universal for this family of bacteria, since all strains analysed so far gave amplification products.

Phylogenetic trees of the 16S rDNA and the corresponding rpoB sequences of 72 Pasteurellaceae strains, including E. coli as an outgroup, were drawn and are represented in Figs 1 and 2GoGo, respectively. Corresponding clusters observed are labelled according to Olsen et al. (2004)Go. Overall, there was a good correlation when comparing the two trees with a congruency analysis in the Bionumerics software, with a correlation of r=0·80. The main clusters were well recognized within the rpoB tree. There were, however, a few clusters where discrepancies were observed and these are marked in grey in Fig. 2Go.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of the family Pasteurellaceae based on 16S rDNA sequences. The species names, strain numbers and accession numbers are given. Sequences determined in this study are indicated by asterisks. Bootstrap values of 100 replications are indicated at branches. The scale bar represents percentage of sequence divergence. Clusters formed are indicated at the right. The numbers in parentheses correspond to the clusters in Olsen et al. (2004)Go.

 


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of the family Pasteurellaceae based on partial rpoB sequences. The species names, strain numbers and accession numbers are given. Sequences determined in this study are indicated by asterisks. Bootstrap values of 100 replications are indicated at branches. The scale bar represents percentage of sequence divergence. Clusters formed are indicated at the right. The numbers in parentheses correspond to the clusters in Olsen et al. (2004)Go and are shown in grey, where differences from the 16S rDNA tree can be observed.

 
Within the cluster of Pasteurella sensu stricto, both rpoB and 16S rDNA trees show a similar separation of Pasteurella multocida subsp. septica from the other two subspecies. The location of Haemophilus felis is very similar in the 16S rDNA and rpoB trees, suggesting a close relationship to the type species Pasteurella multocida. Besides these two observations, the trees differ concerning the clustering of the other Pasteurella species. The mammalian species Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella dagmatis and Pasteurella stomatis cluster in the 16S rDNA tree close to the type species of the genus Pasteurella but they form a separate cluster in the rpoB tree.

Pasteurella trehalosi is closely related to Mannheimia phenotypically as well as in the 16S rDNA tree. However, the rpoB tree separates this species from the Mannheimia cluster and places it in close proximity to Haemophilus parasuis/Actinobacillus indolicus (Parasuis group). The two subclusters observed in the 16S-rDNA-derived tree within Mannheimia are also represented in the rpoB tree. Strain P737 shows a full match with the Mannheimia glucosida type strain in the rpoB tree, which is not the case in the 16S rDNA tree, where this strain is located differently but still in the same subcluster. The full match of the rpoB sequences confirms its designation as M. glucosida, which was based on DNA–DNA hybridization initially (Angen et al., 1999Go).

Within the genus Actinobacillus sensu stricto, two distinct subclusters can be observed with rpoB sequences, which is not the case in the 16S rDNA tree. One subcluster is formed by A. pleuropneumoniae, Actinobacillus lignieresii, Actinobacillus arthritidis and the two Actinobacillus genomospecies. The second subcluster within Actinobacillus sensu stricto is formed by the species Actinobacillus suis, Actinobacillus equuli, Actinobacillus ureae, Actinobacillus hominis and Actinobacillus capsulatus. The presence of A. capsulatus in the cluster of Actinobacillus sensu stricto was most striking and, therefore, two field isolates from rabbits were included in the tree to support this observation. Moreover, the A. capsulatus type strain NCTC 11408T received from another culture collection showed 100 % sequence identity to CCUG 12396T, confirming the phylogenetic position of this species in the rpoB tree. This branching is in contrast to the 16S rDNA phylogeny. However, it strongly supports earlier statements by Mutters et al. (1989)Go that this species should be included in the genus Actinobacillus. This is a further indication that the rpoB gene sequence can be used as a valuable tool for a solid taxonomy, especially at the genus level, as has been shown when analysing the type species of the genera (Angen et al., 2003Go). Phylogenetic discrimination between the two species A. suis and A. equuli was not evident in the rpoB tree or in the 16S rDNA phylogeny. In addition, we have shown recently that the RTX toxins of these two species are different, which permits easy differentiation between the haemolytic A. equuli subspecies and A. suis (Berthoud et al., 2002Go; Kuhnert et al., 2003aGo, bGo). The non-haemolytic species Actinobacillus minor settles on a distinct branch near the Actinobacillus sensu stricto cluster in both trees. The two haemolytic strains of a newly discovered Actinobacillus species tentatively designated ‘Actinobacillus porcitonsillarum’, which phenotypically resembles A. pleuropneumoniae, showed a closer relationship to A. minor with the rpoB gene than with the 16S rDNA. Phylogenetically, A. minor and ‘A. porcitonsillarum’ cannot be separated as two species. However, phenotypically the latter is differentiated from A. minor since it is haemolytic due to the secretion of ApxII, and A. minor is, by definition, non-haemolytic (Møller et al., 1996Go; Gottschalk et al., 2003Go). Because of this, and also the problems these strains cause in bacterial and serological diagnosis of porcine pleuropneumonia, where they might be misidentified as A. pleuropneumoniae leading to grave consequences, isolates of ‘A. porcitonsillarum’ deserve particular attention (Gottschalk et al., 2003Go).

There was a difference in the phylogenetic position of Actinobacillus succinogenes between the two trees. Whereas in the 16S rDNA tree this species is on a branch with Histophilus somni, it clustered with Bisgaard taxon 5 in the rpoB tree.

Species of the genus Haemophilus clustered in a similar way to that described for the phylogeny of the genus based on infB sequences (Hedegaard et al., 2001Go). The phylogenetic identity between Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus aegyptius was reflected by a 100 % sequence match of the rpoB gene sequence between the two. For rpoB there was a similar close relationship between the species Haemophilus parainfluenzae and the type species, as observed with infB, in contrast to the 16S rDNA phylogeny. Also, the clustering of Haemophilus aphrophilus with A. actinomycetemcomitans, which is quite distant from the type species of the genus, reflects the infB phylogeny and is in contrast to the 16S rDNA branching, which places the two in close proximity to the type species Haemophilus influenzae. Haemophilus parasuis, which like Haemophilus haemoglobinophilus does not belong to Haemophilus sensu stricto, clusters in both the rpoB and the 16S rDNA tree with A. indolicus. Several strains of Haemophilus parasuis were included in our study. They represent the two 16S rDNA clusters observed within this species (Dewhirst et al., 1992Go; P. Kuhnert, unpublished observation). These two clusters are represented by the two reference strains Bakos A9 and Bakos B26 (Morozumi & Nicolet, 1986Go). Both strains also cluster in the rpoB tree and the Bakos A9 strain is on the same branch in both trees as the Haemophilus parasuis type strain, whereas A. indolicus clusters tightly with the Bakos B26 strain in the rpoB tree. The sequence of Haemophilus ducreyi indicated a separate branch in the rpoB tree, which was similar to the infB phylogeny (Hedegaard et al., 2001Go).

The genus Gallibacterium in both trees is clearly part of the avian cluster. This also holds true for the species Pasteurella avium, Pasteurella volantium and Pasteurella gallinarum, which show a very tight phylogenetic relationship in both trees on a separate branch different from the type species of the genus Pasteurella. In both trees, Bisgaard taxon 33 forms a distinct branch within the avian cluster. However, in the rpoB tree it is accompanied by Bisgaard taxon 5, which clusters with A. succinogenes in the 16S rDNA tree.

The Seminis cluster formed by Pasteurella aerogenes, Pasteurella mairii and A. seminis is also conserved in the rpoB and 16S rDNA trees. We described the Pax RTX toxin recently, in a subset of Pasteurella aerogenes strains causing swine abortion (Kuhnert et al., 2000Go). Pax-positive strains cause problems in phenotypic identification and are often identified as Pasteurella mairii, which contains a variant of the Pax toxin (P. Kuhnert, unpublished results). However, we found a 100 % sequence match between the Pax-negative type strain of Pasteurella aerogenes and the Pax-positive field strain JF1319 and both are clearly separated from Pasteurella mairii in both trees. Therefore, the rpoB sequence together with the 16S rDNA would help to reorganize the Pasteurella aerogenes complex, which needs to be separated, probably into a new genus. Pasteurella aerogenes is phenotypically closely related to Actinobacillus rossii. However, this is on a distant branch together with Actinobacillus porcinus in the 16S rDNA tree as well as in the rpoB tree. In the latter, these two porcine species cluster with Pasteurella caballi and Pasteurella langaaensis, a phylogenetic relationship that is at odds with that found with 16S rDNA.

The similarity matrix of the rpoB sequences for all the strains investigated in this study is available as supplementary material in IJSEM Online. Given that sequence divergences of the 16S rDNA are approximately 6–7 % between the genera of the family, we can draw a threshold value for the rpoB gene sequences analysed in this study at 10–12 % between the genera.

In conclusion, we found that the resolution of the rpoB gene within the family Pasteurellaceae is generally greater than that of the 16S rDNA sequence but still does not allow the investigation of very closely related species. There was a good correlation between 16S rDNA- and rpoB gene-based phylogenies within the family Pasteurellaceae, even though discrepancies were observed for certain species. However, the topology of the rpoB tree is in a better agreement with the DNA–DNA hybridization results and seems to dissect the genera of the family better than the 16S rDNA tree does, as shown, for example, by the clustering of A. capsulatus within the Actinobacillus sensu stricto group in the rpoB tree. Therefore, the rpoB gene not only complements the 16S rDNA phylogeny but will actually be a powerful tool for the revision of the taxonomy of Pasteurellaceae. Moreover, by describing a universally applicable amplification and sequencing approach for the partial rpoB gene sequence determination of Pasteurellaceae species, we generated a powerful tool for DNA-sequence-based identification. Generating parallel databases for 16S rDNA and rpoB gene sequences, as is currently being done on the SmartGene IDNS platform (www.smartgene.ch), will further help to clarify the phylogeny of Pasteurellaceae and help in the reclassification of this family. The inclusion of further housekeeping genes like infB, atpD and others, resulting in a multi-locus-sequencing approach, will certainly help to achieve this aim (Christensen et al., 2004Go).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported by a grant from the KTI (no. 6041.1 KTS).


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Angen, Ø., Mutters, R., Caugant, D. A., Olsen, J. E. & Bisgaard, M. (1999). Taxonomic relationships of the [Pasteurella] haemolytica complex as evaluated by DNA–DNA hybridizations and 16S rRNA sequencing with proposal of Mannheimia haemolytica gen. nov., comb. nov., Mannheimia granulomatis comb. nov., Mannheimia glucosida sp. nov., Mannheimia ruminalis sp. nov. and Mannheimia varigena sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 67–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Angen, Ø., Ahrens, P., Kuhnert, P., Christensen, H. & Mutters, R. (2003). Proposal of Histophilus somni gen. nov., sp. nov. for the three species incertae sedisHaemophilus somnus’, ‘Haemophilus agni’ and ‘Histophilus ovis’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 1449–1456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berthoud, H., Frey, J. & Kuhnert, P. (2002). Characterization of Aqx and its operon: the hemolytic RTX determinant of Actinobacillus equuli. Vet Microbiol 87, 159–174.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bisgaard, M. (1993). Ecology and significance of Pasteurellaceae in animals. Zentralbl Bakteriol 279, 7–26.[Medline]

Busse, H. J., Bunka, S., Hensel, A. & Lubitz, W. (1997). Discrimination of members of the family of Pasteurellaceae based on polyamine patterns. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 698–708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christensen, H., Bisgaard, M., Bojesen, A. M., Mutters, R. & Olsen, J. E. (2003a). Genetic relationships among avian isolates classified as Pasteurella haemolytica, ‘Actinobacillus salpingitidis’ or Pasteurella anatis with proposal of Gallibacterium anatis gen. nov., comb. nov. and description of additional genomospecies within Gallibacterium gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 275–287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christensen, H., Foster, G., Christensen, J. P., Pennycott, T., Olsen, J. E. & Bisgaard, M. (2003b). Phylogenetic analysis by 16S rDNA gene sequence comparison of avian taxa of Bisgaard and characterization and description of two new taxa of Pasteurellaceae. J Appl Microbiol 95, 354–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Christensen, H., Kuhnert, P., Olsen, J. E. & Bisgaard, M. (2004). Comparative phylogeny between the housekeeping genes atpD, infB, rpoB and 16S rDNA within Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol (in press).

Dahllof, I., Baillie, H. & Kjelleberg, S. (2000). rpoB-based microbial community analysis avoids limitations inherent in 16S rRNA gene intraspecies heterogeneity. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 3376–3380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

De Ley, J., Mannheim, W., Mutters, R. & 7 other authors (1990). Inter- and intrafamilial similarities of rRNA cistrons of the Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40, 126–137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dewhirst, F. E., Paster, B. J., Olsen, I. & Fraser, G. J. (1992). Phylogeny of 54 representative strains of species in the family Pasteurellaceae as determined by comparison of 16S rRNA sequences. J Bacteriol 174, 2002–2013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dewhirst, F. E., Paster, B. J., Olsen, I. & Fraser, G. J. (1993). Phylogeny of the Pasteurellaceae as determined by comparison of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequences. Zentralbl Bakteriol 279, 35–44.[Medline]

Drancourt, M. & Raoult, D. (2002). rpoB gene sequence-based identification of Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol 40, 1333–1338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Foster, G., Ross, H. M., Malnick, H., Willems, A., Hutson, R. A., Reid, R. J. & Collins, M. D. (2000). Phocoenobacter uteri gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Pasteurellaceae Pohl (1979) 1981 isolated from a harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 135–139.[Abstract]

Frey, J. & Kuhnert, P. (2002). RTX toxins in Pasteurellaceae. Int J Med Microbiol 292, 149–158.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gottschalk, M., Broes, A., Mittal, K. R., Kobisch, M., Kuhnert, P., Lebrun, A. & Frey, J. (2003). Non-pathogenic Actinobacillus isolates antigenically and biochemically similar to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: a novel species? Vet Microbiol 92, 87–101.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hedegaard, J., Okkels, H., Bruun, B., Kilian, M., Mortensen, K. K. & Norskov-Lauritsen, N. (2001). Phylogeny of the genus Haemophilus as determined by comparison of partial infB sequences. Microbiology 147, 2599–2609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ko, K. S., Kim, J. M., Kim, J. W., Jung, B. Y., Kim, W., Kim, I. J. & Kook, Y. H. (2003). Identification of Bacillus anthracis by rpoB sequence analysis and multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 41, 2908–2914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuhnert, P., Capaul, S. E., Nicolet, J. & Frey, J. (1996). Phylogenetic positions of Clostridium chauvoei and Clostridium septicum based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46, 1174–1176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuhnert, P., Heyberger-Meyer, B., Nicolet, J. & Frey, J. (2000). Characterization of PaxA and its operon: a cohemolytic RTX toxin determinant from pathogenic Pasteurella aerogenes. Infect Immun 68, 6–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuhnert, P., Frey, J., Lang, N. P. & Mayfield, L. (2002). A phylogenetic analysis of Prevotella nigrescens, Prevotella intermedia and Porphyromonas gingivalis clinical strains reveals a clear species clustering. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1391–1395.[Abstract]

Kuhnert, P., Berthoud, H., Christensen, H., Bisgaard, M. & Frey, J. (2003a). Phylogenetic relationship of equine Actinobacillus species and distribution of RTX toxin genes among clusters. Vet Res 34, 353–359.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kuhnert, P., Berthoud, H., Straub, R. & Frey, J. (2003b). Host specific activity of RTX toxins from haemolytic Actinobacillus equuli and Actinobacillus suis. Vet Microbiol 92, 161–167.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lally, E. T., Golub, E. E. & Kieba, I. R. (1994). Identification and immunological characterization of the domain of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin that determines its specificity for human target cells. J Biol Chem 269, 31289–31295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Møller, K., Fussing, V., Grimont, P. A. D., Paster, B. J., Dewhirst, F. E. & Kilian, M. (1996). Actinobacillus minor sp. nov., Actinobacillus porcinus sp. nov., and Actinobacillus indolicus sp. nov., three new V factor-dependent species from the respiratory tract of pigs. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46, 951–956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mollet, C., Drancourt, M. & Raoult, D. (1997). rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. Mol Microbiol 26, 1005–1011.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mollet, C., Drancourt, M. & Raoult, D. (1998). Determination of Coxiella burnetii rpoB sequence and its use for phylogenetic analysis. Gene 19, 97–103.

Morozumi, T. & Nicolet, J. (1986). Morphological variations of Haemophilus parasuis strains. J Clin Microbiol 23, 138–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mutters, R., Piechulla, K. & Mannheim, W. (1984). Phenotypic differentiation of Pasteurella sensu stricto and the Actinobacillus group. Eur J Clin Microbiol 3, 225–229.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mutters, R., Ihm, P., Pohl, S., Frederiksen, W. & Mannheim, W. (1985). Reclassification of the genus Pasteurella Trevisan 1887 on the basis of deoxyribonucleic acid homology, with proposals for the new species Pasteurella dagmatis, Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella stomatis, Pasteurella anatis, and Pastuerella langaa. Int J Syst Bacteriol 35, 309–322.

Mutters, R., Mannheim, W. & Bisgaard, M. (1989). Taxonomy of the group. In Pasteurella and Pasteurellosis, pp. 3–34. Edited by C. Adlam & J. M. Rutter. London: Academic Press.

Olsen, I., Dewhirst, F. E., Paster, B. J. & Busse, H. J. (2004). Family Pasteurellaceae. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn. Edited by G. R. Garrity. New York: Springer (in press).

Osawa, R., Rainey, F. A., Fujisawa, T., Lang, E., Busse, H. J., Walsh, T. & Stackebrandt, E. (1995). Lonepinella koalarum gen. nov., sp. nov., a new tannin-protein complex degrading bacterium. Syst Appl Microbiol 18, 368–373.

Pohl, S. (1981). DNA relatedness among members of Haemophilus, Pasteurella and Actinobacillus. In Haemophilus, Pasteurella and Actinobacillus, p. 253. Edited by M. Kilian, W. Frederiksen & E. L. Biberstein. London: Academic Press.

Taillardat-Bisch, A. V., Raoult, D. & Drancourt, M. (2003). RNA polymerase {beta}-subunit-based phylogeny of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Neorickettsia spp. and Wolbachia pipientis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 455–458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
R. H. Gregersen, C. Neubauer, H. Christensen, A. M. Bojesen, M. Hess, and M. Bisgaard
Comparative studies on [Pasteurella] testudinis and [P.] testudinis-like bacteria and proposal of Chelonobacter oris gen. nov., sp. nov. as a new member of the family Pasteurellaceae
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, July 1, 2009; 59(7): 1583 - 1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
M. Bisgaard, B. M. Korczak, H.-J. Busse, P. Kuhnert, A. M. Bojesen, and H. Christensen
Classification of the taxon 2 and taxon 3 complex of Bisgaard within Gallibacterium and description of Gallibacterium melopsittaci sp. nov., Gallibacterium trehalosifermentans sp. nov. and Gallibacterium salpingitidis sp. nov.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, April 1, 2009; 59(4): 735 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
B. Lamy, A. Kodjo, the colBVH Study Group, and F. Laurent
Prospective Nationwide Study of Aeromonas Infections in France
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2009; 47(4): 1234 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvdiHome page
F. Dousse, A. Thomann, I. Brodard, B. M. Korczak, Y. Schlatter, P. Kuhnert, R. Miserez, and J. Frey
Routine phenotypic identification of bacterial species of the family Pasteurellaceae isolated from animals
J Vet Diagn Invest, November 1, 2008; 20(6): 716 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
S. Albini, B. M. Korczak, C. Abril, D. Hussy, S. Limat, V. Gerber, M. Hermann, B. Howald, and R. Miserez
Mandibular lymphadenopathy caused by Actinomyces denticolens mimicking strangles in three horses
Vet Rec., February 2, 2008; 162(5): 158 - 159.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
M. Enache, T. Itoh, T. Fukushima, R. Usami, L. Dumitru, and M. Kamekura
Phylogenetic relationships within the family Halobacteriaceae inferred from rpoB' gene and protein sequences
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, October 1, 2007; 57(10): 2289 - 2295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
P. Kuhnert, B. M. Korczak, H. Christensen, and M. Bisgaard
Emended description of Actinobacillus capsulatus Arseculeratne 1962, 38AL
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, March 1, 2007; 57(3): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
H. Christensen, P. Kuhnert, H.-J. Busse, W. C. Frederiksen, and M. Bisgaard
Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, species and subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, January 1, 2007; 57(1): 166 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
M. Kupfer, P. Kuhnert, B. M. Korczak, R. Peduzzi, and A. Demarta
Genetic relationships of Aeromonas strains inferred from 16S rRNA, gyrB and rpoB gene sequences
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, December 1, 2006; 56(12): 2743 - 2751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
P. Kuhnert and B. M. Korczak
Prediction of whole-genome DNA-DNA similarity, determination of G+C content and phylogenetic analysis within the family Pasteurellaceae by multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA).
Microbiology, September 1, 2006; 152(Pt 9): 2537 - 2548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
B. M. Korczak, R. Stieber, S. Emler, A. P. Burnens, J. Frey, and P. Kuhnert
Genetic relatedness within the genus Campylobacter inferred from rpoB sequences.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, May 1, 2006; 56(Pt 5): 937 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Rasch, J. B. Andersen, K. F. Nielsen, L. R. Flodgaard, H. Christensen, M. Givskov, and L. Gram
Involvement of Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Signals in Spoilage of Bean Sprouts
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2005; 71(6): 3321 - 3330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A.-L. Gautier, D. Dubois, F. Escande, J.-L. Avril, P. Trieu-Cuot, and O. Gaillot
Rapid and Accurate Identification of Human Isolates of Pasteurella and Related Species by Sequencing the sodA Gene
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2005; 43(5): 2307 - 2314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
H. Christensen, M. Bisgaard, O. Angen, W. Frederiksen, and J. E. Olsen
Characterization of Sucrose-Negative Pasteurella multocida Variants, Including Isolates from Large-Cat Bite Wounds
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2005; 43(1): 259 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
P. Kuhnert, B. Korczak, E. Falsen, R. Straub, A. Hoops, P. Boerlin, J. Frey, and R. Mutters
Nicoletella semolina gen. nov., sp. nov., a New Member of Pasteurellaceae Isolated from Horses with Airway Disease
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2004; 42(12): 5542 - 5548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
R. L. Davies
Genetic diversity among Pasteurella multocida strains of avian, bovine, ovine and porcine origin from England and Wales by comparative sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene
Microbiology, December 1, 2004; 150(12): 4199 - 4210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
H. Christensen, P. Kuhnert, J. E. Olsen, and M. Bisgaard
Comparative phylogenies of the housekeeping genes atpD, infB and rpoB and the 16S rRNA gene within the Pasteurellaceae
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, September 1, 2004; 54(5): 1601 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korczak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnert, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korczak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnert, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Korczak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnert, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS