IJSEM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum
Right arrow Erratum (v55,p981)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feurer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dauga, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feurer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dauga, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feurer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dauga, C.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54 (2004), 1055-1061; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.02907-0
© 2004 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Taxonomic characterization of nine strains isolated from clinical and environmental specimens, and proposal of Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum sp. nov.

Carole Feurer1,2,4,{dagger}, Dominique Clermont1, François Bimet1, Adina Candréa1, Mary Jackson3, Philippe Glaser2, Chantal Bizet1 and Catherine Dauga1,{ddagger}

1 Collection de l'Institut Pasteur, Institut Pasteur, 25–28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France
2 Laboratoire de Génomique des Micro-organismes Pathogènes, Département Structure et Dynamique des Génomes, Institut Pasteur, 25–28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France
3 Unité de Génétique Mycobactérienne, Département Pathogénèse Microbienne, Institut Pasteur, 25–28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France
4 Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology, Rossa Avenue, Cork, Ireland

Correspondence
Catherine Dauga
cdauga{at}pasteur.fr


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Nine unidentified Gram-positive, lipophilic corynebacteria were isolated from clinical and food samples and subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic analysis. The bacteria were distinguished from Corynebacterium species with validly published names by biochemical tests, fatty acid content and whole-cell protein analysis. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis demonstrated unambiguously that the nine strains were related phylogenetically to the species Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum’ and represented a distinct subline within the genus Corynebacterium. On the basis of both phenotypic and phylogenetic evidence, the formal description of Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of C. tuberculostearicum is Medalle XT (=LDC-20T=CIP 107291T=CCUG 45418T=ATCC 35529T).


The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences determined in this study are shown in Fig. 2Go.

{dagger}Present address: UMR de Génie et Microbiologie des Procédés Alimentaires, INRA, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France. Back

{ddagger}Present address: Plate-forme 4, Génopole, Institut Pasteur, 25–28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France. Back


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Corynebacterium species have been detected in various habitats, including dairy products, soil and vegetables (Brennan et al., 2001Go; Fudou et al., 2002Go), and in a large variety of hosts such as tortoises, cats (Collins et al., 2001bGo), dogs (Collins et al., 1999bGo), seals (Pascual et al., 1998Go), goats, cows (Fernandez-Garayzabal et al., 1997Go) and sheep (Collins et al., 2001aGo). Several species have been implicated in human disease. Corynebacterium diphtheriae is the aetiological agent of diphtheria. Other species are recognized as opportunistic pathogens, and have been isolated from diverse clinical specimens, including the genito-urinary tract (Collins et al., 1999aGo; Funke et al., 1995Go; Furness et al., 1979Go), the respiratory tract (Riegel et al., 1995bGo, 1997bGo; Zimmermann et al., 1998Go), blood samples (Riegel et al., 1997aGo; Funke et al., 1997cGo) and surgical infections (Esteban et al., 1999Go; Yassin et al., 2002bGo). In the 2 years before this paper was written, nine novel species had been described, namely Corynebacterium capitovis (Collins et al., 2001aGo), Corynebacterium testudinoris and Corynebacterium felinum (Collins et al., 2001bGo), Corynebacterium freneyi (Renaud et al., 2001Go), Corynebacterium aurimucosum (Yassin et al., 2002aGo), Corynebacterium mooreparkense (Brennan et al., 2001Go), Corynebacterium appendicis (Yassin et al., 2002bGo), Corynebacterium efficiens (Fudou et al., 2002Go) and Corynebacterium spheniscorum (Goyache et al., 2003Go).

Some species of the genus Corynebacterium belong to the normal flora of the skin (Funke et al., 1997aGo; Collins et al., 1988Go), while others were isolated from specific cutaneous lesions. In leprosy, Corynebacterium spp., referred to as leprosy-derived corynebacteria (LDC) (Beaman et al., 1974Go), were initially reported as a homogeneous and unique group of organisms within the genus Corynebacterium, and were later included in the ‘corynebacteria pathogenic for humans' (Danhaive et al., 1982Go). A novel species, Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum’, was described as a lipid-requiring LDC, differing from other corynebacteria by the production of tuberculostearic (10-methyl-octadecanoic) acid (Brown et al., 1984Go), although this name was never validly published. Since this description, other members of the genus Corynebacterium have been shown to produce tuberculostearic acid (Funke et al., 1998Go; Yassin et al., 2002aGo, bGo).

Identification of lipophilic corynebacteria appears to be problematic with respect to classic bacteriological methods (Riegel et al., 1995aGo; Watts et al., 2000Go). The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) separated lipophilic corynebacteria into groups ANF-1, G-1 and G-2 in addition to groups JK (Corynebacterium jeikeium) and D-2 (Corynebacterium urealyticum) using biochemical tests (Hollis & Weaver, 1981Go; Riegel et al., 1992Go, 1993Go). According to their ability to ferment fructose, bacteria isolated from urethritis samples were separated into ‘Corynebacterium genitalium’ pathogenic biotypes and ‘Corynebacterium pseudogenitalium’ saprophytic biotypes (Furness et al., 1979Go). In disagreement with these data, DNA–DNA hybridizations distinguished five genomic groups of lipid-requiring corynebacteria (Riegel et al., 1995aGo). Genomospecies I included ‘C. tuberculostearicum LDC8, strain CDC G 5840 (G-2 group), strain CDC F 8156 (G-1 group) and three different ‘C. pseudogenitalium biotypes. Numerous descriptions of novel lipophilic species of the genus Corynebacterium required the use of molecular-based approaches (Riegel et al., 1995aGo; Neubauer et al., 1991Go; Funke et al., 1997bGo; Fernandez-Garayzabal et al., 1997Go; Yassin et al., 2002bGo). The implementation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing combined with improved phenotypic approaches (in particular, biochemical characterization using bioMérieux API 50 CH, API ZYM or API Coryne) has provided an accurate system for the identification of novel corynebacteria. Recently, this strategy has led to the incrimination of ‘C. tuberculostearicum as a causative agent in mastitis (Paviour et al., 2002Go).

During the course of the characterization of strains deposited in the Collection of the Institut Pasteur (CIP), we identified nine isolates from various clinical and food samples as lipophilic Corynebacterium spp. On the basis of phylogenetic investigations, it is suggested that they be classified as ‘C. tuberculostearicum’. Phenotypic comparison of the nine isolates, ‘C. tuberculostearicum strains CIP 107291T and CIP 107067 and ‘C. pseudogenitalium CIP 106714 led us to an emended description of ‘C. tuberculostearicum and the formal proposal of Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum sp. nov.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and culture conditions.
The nine unidentified strains were isolated from different sources (Table 1Go). ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ strain CIP 107291T (=CCUG 45418T=ATCC 35529T), also named Medalle XT or LDC-20T (Brown et al., 1984Go; Danhaive et al., 1982Go), and ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ strain CIP 107067 (=CCUG 41662) were originally obtained from the Culture Collection of the University of Göteborg. ‘C. pseudogenitalium’ (C-1 type) strain CIP 106714 (=CECT 763=ATCC 33035) (Furness et al., 1979Go) was obtained from the Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT). The 12 strains were grown on trypto casein soy agar (Bio-Rad) supplemented with 1 % (v/v) Tween 80 (Riegel et al., 1995aGo; Watts et al., 2000Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ reference strains and unnamed lipophilic corynebacteria used in this study

 
Biochemical characterization.
Four commercially available galleries, API Coryne, API ZYM, Api 50 CH and Biotype-100 strips, were used according to the instructions of the manufacturer (bioMérieux) to determine biochemical characteristics, i.e. fermentation profiles, enzymic reactions and assimilation tests. They were inoculated with a bacterial suspension enriched with 1 % (v/v) Tween 80.

PAGE analysis of whole-cell protein.
Cellular protein extracts for PAGE analysis were prepared as described previously (Barreau & Hansen, 2000Go). Densitometric analysis, normalization and comparison of protein patterns were performed using GelCompar version 2.5 (Applied Maths).

Fatty acid analysis and tuberculostearic acid detection.
Fatty acid methyl esters and mycolic acid methyl esters were extracted as described previously (Phetsuksiri et al., 1999Go). Detection of mycolic acids was performed with TLC (Minnikin et al., 1980Go). Fatty acid methyl esters were analysed by GC on a Shimadzu GC-14A chromatograph using a methyl silicone 5 % phenyl column operating at a temperature of 175 °C for 2 min followed by a programmed increase of 8 °C min–1 to 300 °C. The eluted peak of tuberculostearic acid was identified by comparing its retention time with the retention time of the tuberculostearic acid standard of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Genomic DNA extraction.
Bacteria were scraped from the agar and resuspended in 200 µl TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7·4). After the addition of 50 µl lysozyme (5 mg ml–1, pH 7) and 30 µl RNase A from bovine pancreas (10 mg ml–1), the samples were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Each lysate was transferred to a 2 ml tube (Sarstedt) containing 20 µl 10 % SDS, 0·2 g acid-washed glass beads (212–300 µm; Sigma) and 200 µl phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25 : 24 : 1 by vol.). The tubes were shaken for two periods of 40 s at a speed of 6 m s–1 in a Savant FastPrep apparatus and then centrifuged at 14 000 r.p.m. for 20 min. The upper phase containing DNA was precipitated with absolute ethanol at –20 °C. After centrifugation, the pellets were washed with 70 % ethanol, dried and dissolved in 200 µl TE buffer.

16S rRNA gene amplification.
16S rRNA genes were amplified by PCR using the universal primers A (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3', positions 8–27 according to the Escherichia coli numbering system; Brosius et al., 1978Go) and H (5'-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3', positions 1541–1522) (Böttger, 1989Go). Each reaction was performed in a 100 µl volume containing 20 pmol each primer, 2·5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Applied Science), 10 µl reaction buffer containing MgCl2, 0·3 mM each dNTP (Pharmacia Biotech) and 1 µl template DNA. PCR amplification was carried out in a GeneAmp thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems), using the following thermal profile: 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 57 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 2 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were examined using 1 % (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. SmartLadder (Eurogentec) was used as a molecular size marker.

16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Each PCR product was treated using the ExoSAP-IT exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase protocol (USB). PCR products were then sequenced using the Taq DyeDeoxy terminator cycle sequencing kit and an ABI PRISM 3700 DNA sequencer according to the instructions of the manufacturer (PE Applied Biosystems). Primers A and H and sequencing primers 5'-CTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT-3' (positions 339–358 according to the E. coli numbering system), 5'-ACTGCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAG-3' (positions 358–339), 5'-CGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAAT-3' (positions 514–534), 5'-GCATGTGGTTTAATTCGA-3' (positions 947–964), 5'-TCGAATTAAACCACATGC-3' (positions 964–947) and 5'-AGGGTTGCGCTCGTTGCGG-3' (positions 1115–1097) were used. The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences determined in this study are shown in Fig. 2Go.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Neighbour-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships between the nine unidentified strains and ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ and some other related taxa. Significant bootstrap values (%) are given at branching points. Bar, 0·005 substitutions per site.

 
Computational analysis.
The 16S rRNA sequences were compared with known sequences in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases by using the BLASTN 2.2.4 algorithm (Altschul et al., 1997Go). Sequences were then aligned using the CLUSTAL V algorithm (Higgins, 1994Go) with default gap penalties. The initial alignment was further refined by eye, introducing gaps to improve the overall alignment, using the alignment editor of the PAUP* version 4.0 software package (Swofford, 1998Go). Sequence-distance matrices were established in pairwise comparisons by applying the algorithm of Tamura & Nei (1993)Go. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbour-joining method (Saitou & Nei, 1987Go) using the PHYLIP version 3.5 software package (Felsenstein, 1993Go). A maximum-likelihood analysis was performed using the same model and an estimated rate gamma shape of 0·7484 with PAUP* 4.0 version (Felsenstein, 1981Go). Maximum-parsimony trees were obtained using 100 random-addition heuristic search replicates and the tree bisection–reconnection branch-swapping option. Statistical significance was evaluated by bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein, 1985Go), with 100 iterations of bootstrap samplings.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Phenotypic characterization of strains
The nine unidentified strains were non-motile, non-spore-forming, pleomorphic, Gram-positive rods, frequently swollen at one or both ends, and aerobic to facultatively anaerobic. On trypto casein soy agar supplemented with 1 % (v/v) Tween 80, colonies were whitish and glistening with entire edges (1 mm diameter after 24–48 h at 37 °C). All isolates were oxidase-negative, catalase-positive and urease-negative. Most had enzymic activities similar to those of ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ CIP 107291T, CIP 107067 and ‘C. pseudogenitalium’ CIP 106714 in the API ZYM system. Reactions for esterase (C4) and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase were positive for all strains. No activity was detected for {alpha}-galactosidase, {beta}-galactosidase, {alpha}-fucosidase, lipase (C14), trypsin or {alpha}-chymotrypsin. Results for nitrate reductase, esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase and alkaline phosphatase production are shown in Table 2Go. With API 50 CH, acid was produced from galactose, glucose, glycerol, fructose, mannose, ribose and 5-ketogluconate but not from mannitol, glycogen, starch, lactose or xylose. Sucrose and maltose were not fermented by any of the strains, even after 3 days incubation (Table 2Go). Biotype-100 strips showed that the substrates D-glucose, sucrose, D-ribose, glycerol, L-malate, 2-ketogluconate, succinate, fumarate, L-aspartate, L-glutamate, L-proline and L-serine were always used as sole carbon sources. L-Alanine was assimilated by all strains except ‘C. tuberculostearicum CIP 107067. 2-Ketogluconate was assimilated by all strains except C. pseudogenitalium’ CIP 106714. The API Coryne system generated the numerical code 6100324 for ‘C. tuberculostearicum strains CIP 107291T and CIP 102590, 6100325 for strains CIP 102211, CIP 102346, CIP 101775, ‘C. tuberculostearicum CIP 107067 and ‘C. pseudogenitalium’ CIP 106714, 7100325 for strains CIP 102124, CIP 102857 and CIP 102076, 6100305 for strain CIP 102622 and 2100325 for strain CIP 102645. These codes corresponded to Corynebacterium CDC group G in the API Coryne profile index. GC analyses of non-hydroxylated fatty acid methyl esters showed that C18 : 0, C18 : 1cis9 and C18 : 2 were the predominant cellular fatty acids in the nine strains, C. tuberculostearicum’ CIP 107291T and CIP 107067, in agreement with a previous study (Bernard et al., 1991Go). Small amounts of tuberculostearic acid (0·83–4·42 %) and mycolic acids were also detected in the strains. All these strains clustered together in SDS-PAGE analysis and formed a distinct branch with a correlation level of more than 72 % (Fig. 1Go). These chemotaxonomic findings demonstrated that the nine strains, ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ strains CIP 107291T and CIP 107067 and ‘C. pseudogenitalium CIP 106714 represented a homogeneous group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Differential characteristics of C. tuberculostearicum and its nearest phylogenetic relatives

Species/strains: 1, C. accolens CIP 104783T; 2, ‘C. fastidiosum’ CIP 103808; 3, C. macginleyi CIP 104099T; 4, ‘C. segmentosum’ CIP 107068; 5, C. tuberculostearicum (n=11); 6, ‘C. pseudogenitalium’ CIP 106714. Values for C. tuberculostearicum are percentages of strains giving positive results.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Similarity dendrogram based on whole-cell protein patterns of the nine unidentified strains, ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ and related strains. For convenience, levels of correlation are expressed as percentages of similarity.

 
Phylogenetic analysis
To ascertain the phylogenetic positions of the isolates, complete 16S rRNA gene sequences (1512 nucleotides) of the nine unidentified strains, ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ CIP 107291T and CIP 107067 and ‘C. pseudogenitalium CIP 106714 were determined and subjected to a comparative analysis. Sequence searches of the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases revealed that the nine unidentified strains were closely related to species of the genus Corynebacterium. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the nine strains displayed high levels of similarity (89·8–98·9 %) to those of previously described members of the genus Corynebacterium. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis based on Corynebacterium 16S rRNA gene sequences deposited in international databases showed that the nine sequences clustered with ‘C. tuberculostearicum ATCC 35692T (accession no. X84247) and ‘C. pseudogenitalium ATCC 33035 (U87822), confirming that the isolates were members of the genus Corynebacterium (data not shown). A neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree depicting the relationships between the strains and the nearest Corynebacterium species is shown in Fig. 2Go. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolates grouped with those of ‘C. pseudogenitalium’ CIP 106714 and ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ strains CIP 107291T and CIP 107067. Comparison of sequences from this monophyletic group revealed 0–8 nucleotide differences (corresponding to 100–99·2 % similarity). The high levels of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity suggested that the nine strains, ‘C. tuberculostearicum strains CIP 107291T and CIP 107067 and ‘C. pseudogenitalium CIP 106714 belonged to the same species (Drancourt et al., 2000Go).

Differential properties
The monophyletic group of ‘C. tuberculostearicum and related strains formed a distinct lineage within a small phylogenetic group including Corynebacterium accolens, Corynebacterium macginleyi, ‘Corynebacterium segmentosum’ and ‘Corynebacterium fastidiosum’. Sequence similarities between ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ taxa and C. accolens, C. macginleyi, C. segmentosum’ and ‘C. fastidiosum ranged from 97·54 to 98·57 %. These similarity values, alone, are too high (above 97 %) to distinguish ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ formally from closely related species (Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994Go). Previous studies have shown that numerous species of the genus Corynebacterium that exhibited only limited 16S rRNA divergence presented sufficient distinctive characters, fully justifying their classification in separate species (Pascual et al., 1995Go). This was the case for Corynebacterium ulcerans, C. diphtheriae and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, which share more than 98 % 16S rRNA similarity. Similarly, Corynebacterium propinquum and Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum share more than 99 % 16S rRNA similarity (Pascual et al., 1995Go; Ruimy et al., 1995Go). Thus, the 97 % limit is not decisive for separating species of the genus Corynebacterium: further characteristics are required. Biochemical features such as production of alkaline phosphatase, leucine arylamidase, nitrate reductase, esterase lipase, pyrazinamidase and {alpha}-glucosidase or fermentation of glycerol and galactose confirmed that the 12 strains were distinct from C. accolens CIP 104783T, C. macginleyi CIP 104099T, ‘C. segmentosum’ CIP 107068 and ‘C. fastidiosum CIP 103808 (Table 2Go). The type strain of C. accolens produced acid from maltose, as described previously (Neubauer et al., 1991Go). However, another study showed that only 7 % of strains of C. accolens studied fermented maltose (Riegel et al., 1995aGo). Thus, the fermentation of maltose becomes an unreliable characteristic, as reported previously (Funke et al., 1997aGo). We also noted that acid was produced from glycogen by C. accolens CIP 104783T with API 50 CH but not with API Coryne, while the 11 strains of ‘C. tuberculostearicum’, C. genitalium CIP 106714, C. macginleyi CIP 104099T, ‘C. segmentosum’ CIP 107068 and ‘C. fastidiosum’ CIP 103808 did not ferment glycogen with either API 50 CH or API Coryne. SDS-PAGE patterns of C. accolens CIP 104783T, C. macginleyi CIP 104099T, ‘C. segmentosum’ CIP 107068 and ‘C. fastidiosum CIP 103808 did not display a close affinity with those of ‘C. tuberculostearicum’. In addition, a previous DNA hybridization study showed clearly that C. accolens, C. macginleyi and ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ (strain LDC 8) belong to separate genomic species (Riegel et al., 1995aGo). Recently, a lipophilic species, C. appendicis, isolated from humans, has been described (Yassin et al., 2002bGo). This novel species can be differentiated from ‘C. tuberculostearicum’ by its ability to hydrolyse urea and by its position in the 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2Go).

Consequently, we feel that, on the basis of phenotypic data, whole-cell protein profiles and 16S rRNA sequence analysis, it is reasonable to assign the nine Corynebacterium strains CIP 101775, CIP 102076, CIP 102124, CIP 102211, CIP 102346, CIP 102590, CIP 102622, CIP 102645, CIP 102857 and ‘C. pseudogenitalium’ CIP 106714 to the species Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum. An emended description of this species is presented below.

Description of Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum sp. nov.
Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum (tu.ber.cu.lo.stea'ri.cum. N.L. neut. adj. tuberculostearicum of tuberculostearic acid, which is contained in the cells).

Cells are pleomorphic, Gram-positive rods, non-motile and non-spore-forming, developing coccoid forms in stationary cultures. Colonies on trypto casein soy agar supplemented with Tween 80 are circular, convex, glistening and 1 mm in diameter. Aerobic to facultatively anaerobic. Lipophilic. Oxidase-negative and catalase-positive. Corynebacterium mycolic acids are present and the fatty acid profiles contain tuberculostearic acid. Acid is produced from galactose, glucose, glycerol, fructose, mannose, ribose and 5-ketogluconate but not from mannitol, glycogen, starch, sorbitol, lactose, inulin or xylose. Production of acid from trehalose, maltose, gluconate, sucrose and N-acetylglucosamine is variable. Urea, aesculin and gelatin are not hydrolysed. Presence of nitrate reductase is variable. DNase is absent. Esterase (C4) and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase activities are detected. Presence of esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase is variable. No activity is detected for {alpha}-galactosidase, {beta}-galactosidase, {alpha}-glucosidase, {beta}-glucosidase, {alpha}-fucosidase, lipase (C14), trypsin or {alpha}-chymotrypsin. The following substrates are utilized in 2 or 4 days: D-glucose, sucrose, D-ribose, glycerol, L-malate, 2-ketogluconate, succinate, fumarate, L-aspartate, L-glutamate, L-proline and L-serine. The following substrates are not utilized in 6 days: caprate, citrate and DL-glycerate.

The type strain, Medalle XT (=LDC-20T=CIP 107291T=CCUG 45418T=ATCC 35529T), was isolated from a case of lepromatous leprosy in the Philippines (Brown et al., 1984Go). The type strain has all the properties given for the species. In addition, it assimilates D-mannose.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank E. Falsen (Culture Collection, University of Göteborg, Sweden) for kindly providing strains of C. tuberculostearicum. We are grateful to J. P. Euzéby (Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, France) for help in coining the species epithet.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barreau, C. & Hansen, W. (2000). Chimiotaxonomie. In Précis de Bactériologie Clinique, chapter 2, pp. 27–52. Edited by J. Freney, F. Renaud, W. Hansen & C. Bollet. Paris: ESKA (in French).

Beaman, B. L., Kim, K.-S., Lanéelle, M. A. & Barksdale, L. (1974). Chemical characterization of organisms isolated from leprosy patients. J Bacteriol 117, 1320–1329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bernard, K. A., Bellefeuille, M. & Ewan, E. P. (1991). Cellular fatty acid composition as an adjunct to the identification of asporogenous, aerobic gram-positive rods. J Clin Microbiol 29, 83–89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Böttger, E. C. (1989). Rapid determination of bacterial ribosomal RNA sequences by direct sequencing of enzymatically amplified DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 65, 171–176.[CrossRef]

Brennan, N. M., Brown, R., Goodfellow, M., Ward, A. C., Beresford, T. P., Simpson, P. J., Fox, P. F. & Cogan, T. M. (2001). Corynebacterium mooreparkense sp. nov. and Corynebacterium casei sp. nov., isolated from the surface of a smear-ripened cheese. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 843–852.[Abstract]

Brosius, J., Palmer, M. L., Kennedy, P. J. & Noller, H. F. (1978). Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75, 4801–4805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brown, S., Lanéelle, M. A., Asselineau, J. & Barksdale, L. (1984). Description of Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum sp. nov., a leprosy-derived Corynebacterium. Ann Microbiol (Paris) 135B, 251–267.[Medline]

Collins, M. D., Burton, R. A. & Jones, D. (1988). Corynebacterium amycolatum sp. nov., a new mycolic acid-less Corynebacterium species from human skin. FEMS Microbiol Lett 49, 349–352.[CrossRef]

Collins, M. D., Bernard, K. A., Hutson, R. A., Sjödén, B., Nyberg, A. & Falsen, E. (1999a). Corynebacterium sundsvallense sp. nov., from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 361–366.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collins, M. D., Hoyles, L., Lawson, P. A., Falsen, E., Robson, R. L. & Foster, G. (1999b). Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of a new Corynebacterium species from dogs: description of Corynebacterium auriscanis sp. nov. J Clin Microbiol 37, 3443–3447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collins, M. D., Hoyles, L., Foster, G., Sjödén, B. & Falsen, E. (2001a). Corynebacterium capitovis sp. nov., from a sheep. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 857–860.[Abstract]

Collins, M. D., Hoyles, L., Hutson, R. A., Foster, G. & Falsen, E. (2001b). Corynebacterium testudinoris sp. nov. from a tortoise, and Corynebacterium felinum sp. nov., from a Scottish wild cat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1349–1352.[Abstract]

Danhaive, P., Hoet, P. & Cocito, C. (1982). Base compositions and homologies of deoxyribonucleic acids of corynebacteria isolated from human leprosy lesions and of related microorganisms. Int J Syst Bacteriol 32, 70–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Drancourt, M., Bollet, C., Carlioz, A., Martelin, R., Gayral, J. P. & Raoult, D. (2000). 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol 38, 3623–3630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Esteban, J., Nieto, E., Calvo, R., Fernandez-Roblas, R., Valero-Guillen, P. L. & Soriano, F. (1999). Microbial characterization and clinical significance of Corynebacterium amycolatum strains. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 18, 518–521.[CrossRef][Medline]

Felsenstein, J. (1981). Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17, 368–376.[CrossRef][Medline]

Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.[CrossRef]

Felsenstein, J. (1993). PHYLIP: phylogenetic inference package, version 3.53c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Fernandez-Garayzabal, J. F., Collins, M. D., Hutson, R. A., Fernandez, E., Monasterio, R., Marco, J. & Dominguez, L. (1997). Corynebacterium mastitidis sp. nov., isolated from milk of sheep with subclinical mastitis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 1082–1085.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fudou, R., Jojima, Y., Seto, A., Yamada, K., Kimura, E., Nakamatsu, T., Hiraishi, A. & Yamanaka, S. (2002). Corynebacterium efficiens sp. nov., a glutamic-acid-producing species from soil and vegetables. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1127–1131.[Abstract]

Funke, G., Bernard, K. A., Bucher, C., Pfyffer, G. E. & Collins, M. D. (1995). Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum sp. nov. isolated from male patients with genitourinary infections. Med Microbiol Lett 4, 204–215.[Medline]

Funke, G., von Graevenitz, A., Clarridge, J. E., III & Bernard, K. A. (1997a). Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 10, 125–159.[Abstract]

Funke, G., Hutson, R. A., Hilleringmann, M., Heizmann, W. R. & Collins, D. (1997b). Corynebacterium lipophiloflavum sp. nov. isolated from a patient with bacterial vaginosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 150, 219–224.[Medline]

Funke, G., Lawson, P. A. & Collins, M. D. (1997c). Corynebacterium mucifaciens sp. nov., an unusual species from human clinical material. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 952–957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Funke, G., Osorio, C. R., Frei, R., Riegel, P. & Collins, M. D. (1998). Corynebacterium confusum sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 1291–1296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Furness, G., Sambury, S. & Evangelista, A. T. (1979). Corynebacterium pseudogenitalium sp. nov. Commensals of the human male and female urogenital tracts. Invest Urol 16, 292–295.[Medline]

Goyache, J., Vela, A. I., Collins, M. D. & 7 other authors (2003). Corynebacterium spheniscorum sp. nov., isolated from the cloacae of wild penguins. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 43–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Higgins, D. G. (1994). CLUSTAL V: multiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences. Methods Mol Biol 25, 307–318.[Medline]

Hollis, D. G. & Weaver, R. E. (1981). Gram-positive Organisms: a Guide to Identification. Atlanta, GA: Special Bacteriology Section, Centers for Disease Control.

Minnikin, D. E., Hutchinson, I. G., Caldicott, A. B. & Goodfellow, M. (1980). Thin-layer chromatography of methanolysates of mycolic acid-containing bacteria. J Chromatogr 188, 221–223.[CrossRef]

Neubauer, M., Sourek, J., Ryc, M., Bohacek, J., Mara, M. & Mnukova, J. (1991). Corynebacterium accolens sp. nov., a gram-positive rod exhibiting satellitism, from clinical material. Syst Appl Microbiol 14, 46–51.

Pascual, C., Lawson, P. A., Farrow, J. A. E., Gimenez, M. N. & Collins, M. D. (1995). Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Corynebacterium based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 724–728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pascual, C., Foster, G., Alvarez, N. & Collins, M. D. (1998). Corynebacterium phocae sp. nov., isolated from the common seal (Phoca vitulina). Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 601–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paviour, S., Musaad, S., Roberts, S., Taylor, G., Taylor, S., Shore, K., Lang, S. & Holland, D. (2002). Corynebacterium species isolated from patients with mastitis. Clin Infect Dis 35, 1434–1440.[CrossRef][Medline]

Phetsuksiri, B., Baulard, A. R., Cooper, A., Minnikin, D. E., Douglas, J. D., Besra, G. S. & Brennan, P. J. (1999). Antimycobacterial activities of isoxyl and new derivatives through the inhibition of mycolic acid synthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43, 1042–1051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Renaud, F. N. R., Aubel, D., Riegel, P., Meugnier, H. & Bollet, C. (2001). Corynebacterium freneyi sp. nov., {alpha}-glucosidase-positive strains related to Corynebacterium xerosis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1723–1728.[Abstract]

Riegel, P., Grimont, P. A. D., De Briel, D., Ageron, E., Jehl, F., Pelegrin, M., Monteil, H. & Monck, R. (1992). Corynebacterium group D2 (‘Corynebacterium urealyticum’) constitutes a new genomic species. Res Microbiol 143, 307–313.[Medline]

Riegel, P., De Briel, D., Prevost, G., Jehl, F., Monteil, H. & Minck, R. (1993). Taxonomic study of Corynebacterium group ANF-1 strains: proposal of Corynebacterium afermentans sp. nov. containing the subspecies C. afermentans subsp. afermentans subsp. nov. and C. afermentans subsp. lipophilum subsp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43, 287–292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riegel, P., Ruimy, R., De Briel, D., Prévost, G., Jehl, F., Christen, R. & Monteil, H. (1995a). Genomic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among lipid-requiring diphtheroids from humans and characterization of Corynebacterium macginleyi sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 128–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riegel, P., Ruimy, R., De Briel, D., Prevost, G., Jehl, F., Bimet, F., Christen, R. & Monteil, H. (1995b). Corynebacterium argentoratense sp. nov., from the human throat. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 533–537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riegel, P., Ruimy, R., Renaud, F. N. R., Freney, J., Prevost, G., Jehl, F., Christen, R. & Monteil, H. (1997a). Corynebacterium singulare sp. nov., a new species for urease-positive strains related to Corynebacterium minutissimum. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 1092–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riegel, P., Heller, R., Prevost, G., Jehl, F. & Monteil, H. (1997b). Corynebacterium durum sp. nov., from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 1107–1111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ruimy, R., Riegel, P., Boiron, P., Monteil, H. & Christen, R. (1995). Phylogeny of the genus Corynebacterium deduced from analyses of small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 740–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425.[Abstract]

Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. (1994). Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 846–849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Swofford, D. L. (1998). PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

Tamura, K. & Nei, M. (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10, 512–526.[Abstract]

Watts, J. L., Lowery, D. E., Teel, J. F. & Rossbach, S. (2000). Identification of Corynebacterium bovis and other coryneforms isolated from bovine mammary glands. J Dairy Sci 83, 2373–2379.[Abstract]

Yassin, A. F., Steiner, U. & Ludwig, W. (2002a). Corynebacterium aurimucosum sp. nov. and emended description of Corynebacterium minutissimum Collins and Jones (1983). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1001–1005.[Abstract]

Yassin, A. F., Steiner, U. & Ludwig, W. (2002b). Corynebacterium appendicis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1165–1169.[Abstract]

Zimmermann, O., Spröer, C., Kroppenstedt, R. M., Fuchs, E., Köchel, H. G. & Funke, G. (1998). Corynebacterium thomssenii sp. nov., a Corynebacterium with N-acetyl-{beta}-glucosaminidase activity from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 489–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
H. J. Lee, S.-L. Cho, M. Y. Jung, T. H. Van Nguyen, Y.-C. Jung, H. K. Park, V. P. Le, and W. Kim
Corynebacterium doosanense sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, November 1, 2009; 59(11): 2734 - 2737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
V. Merhej, E. Falsen, D. Raoult, and V. Roux
Corynebacterium timonense sp. nov. and Corynebacterium massiliense sp. nov., isolated from human blood and human articular hip fluid
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, August 1, 2009; 59(8): 1953 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum
Right arrow Erratum (v55,p981)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feurer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dauga, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feurer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dauga, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feurer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dauga, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS