|
|
||||||||
Dipartimento Scientifico e Tecnologico, Università degli Studi di Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
Correspondence
Franco Dellaglio
franco.dellaglio{at}univr.it
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| MAIN TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the 1970s, strains belonging to L. cellobiosus and L. fermentum have been subjected to DNADNA hybridization studies, which proved their high relatedness (Vescovo et al., 1979
). Despite the evidence that strains ATCC 11739T and ATCC 11740 of L. cellobiosus showed hybridization values higher than 70 % with L. fermentum ATCC 14932T, the two species were both included in the Approved List of Bacterial Names (Skerman et al., 1980
). A later DNADNA hybridization study (Sriranganathan et al., 1985
), in which the strains L. fermentum NCDO 215 and L. cellobiosus NCDO 927 were examined, confirmed the findings of Vescovo et al. (1979)
, but no reclassification was proposed. On the basis of DNA-relatedness data, Kandler & Weiss (1989)
reported L. cellobiosus as a biotype of L. fermentum in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. As a consequence, L. cellobiosus was omitted from the phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus (Collins et al., 1991
), and the 16S rDNA sequence of L. cellobiosus has been deposited only very recently, under the designation L. fermentum (AJ575812).
Considering other literature, it is clear that the treatment of L. cellobiosus is inconsistent. Pot et al. (1994)
reported that the name L. cellobiosus was invalid, while Dellaglio et al. (1994)
presented it as a taxon awaiting reclassification, and Hammes & Vogel (1995)
did not include it in a discussion of the Lactobacillus species. Nevertheless, no formal reclassification proposal has been presented so far, despite the availability of data supporting the close relationship between L. fermentum and L. cellobiosus. The latter name is validly published, as described in online taxonomic resources (List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature, http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/; Bacterial Nomenclature Up-to-date, http://www.dsmz.de/bactnom/bactname.htm).
Strain depositions in major culture collections further complicate the study of the status of the species L. cellobiosus. In the ATCC (http://www.atcc.org), only two strains are available, ATCC 11739T and ATCC 11740, but they are registered as Lactobacillus fermentum Beijerinck deposited as Lactobacillus cellobiosus Rogosa et al.. In the DSMZ (http://www.dsmz.de), only strain DSM 20055T is available, with the comment pro synon., Lactobacillus fermentum, never formally stated. The Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Microorganisms, Bacteria Collection (BCCM/LMG; http://www.belspo.be/bccm), has two strains, LMG 9846T and LMG 11441, corresponding to ATCC 11739T and ATCC 11740, respectively, with the former registered as L. cellobiosus and the latter as L. fermentum. Finally, in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM; http://www.jcm.riken.go.jp/), four strains are available: JCM 1137, JCM 2766, JCM 2767 and JCM 2768 all registered as L. fermentum.
In the present study, the phylogenetic placement of L. cellobiosus was determined by the analysis of the 16S rDNA sequences available for the most closely related species. Moreover, for the type strains of L. fermentum and L. cellobiosus, partial sequences for the recA gene were obtained and compared to evaluate better the relatedness of the two species.
Lactobacillus fermentum LMG 6902T and L. cellobiosus DSM 20055T were grown in MRS at 37 and 30 °C, respectively. Cultures were checked for purity, and DNA was extracted by the procedure of Marmur (1961)
.
Small subunit (16S) rDNA sequences were aligned with the CLUSTAL X program (Thompson et al., 1997
). Positions ambiguously aligned, not available or not identified (N in the sequence) were removed from all the sequences. Phylogenetic analysis was performed on the remaining 1366 positions with the TREECON program (Van de Peer & De Wachter, 1994
) using Galtier and Gouy distance (Galtier & Gouy, 1995
). The phylogenetic tree inferred for the considered species is shown in Fig. 1
. The close relationship of L. cellobiosus and L. fermentum is supported by sequence identity: the two strains share 1361 of 1366 bp, confirming the high genetic relatedness suggested by DNA-hybridization data (Vescovo et al., 1979
).
|
Despite the high genetic relatedness, literature data (Rogosa et al., 1953
; Rogosa & Hansen, 1971
; Dellaglio et al., 1994
) suggest that the two taxa differ in several phenotypic traits, as shown in Table 1
. This heterogeneity could be an indication of an infraspecific subdivision, which was not deepened due to the unclear attribution and scarcity of strains in culture collections, as explained above.
|
Emended description of Lactobacillus fermentum Beijerinck 1901
Cells are rods, 0·50·9 µm thick and highly variable in length, occurring singly or in pairs. Heterofermentative strains; they ferment fructose, galactose, glucose, gluconate, lactose, maltose, mannose, melibiose, raffinose, ribose and sucrose. No acid is produced from mannitol, melezitose, rhamnose, salicin or sorbitol. Some strains may produce acid from amygdalin, arabinose, cellobiose, aesculin, trehalose and xylose. Genome G+C content is 5254 mol%. They produce L- or DL-lactic acid and NH3 from arginine, and may grow at 15 or 45 °C. Isolated from milk products, sourdough, fermenting plant material, manure, sewage and human mouth and faeces.
The type strain is ATCC 14931T (=DSM 20052T=NCDO 1750T=LMG 6902T).
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Collins, M. D., Rodrigues, U. M., Ash, C., Aguirre, M., Farrow, J. A. E., Martinez-Murcia, A., Phillips, B. A., Williams, A. M. & Wallbanks, S. (1991). Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77, 512.[CrossRef]
Dellaglio, F., de Roissart, H., Torriani, S., Curk, M. C. & Janssens, D. (1994). Caractéristiques générales des bactéries lactiques, In Bactéries Lactiques, vol. I, pp. 25116. Edited by H. de Roissart & F. M. Luquet. Uriage, France: Lorica.
Felis, G. E., Dellaglio, F., Mizzi, L. & Torriani, S. (2001). Comparative sequence analysis of a recA gene fragment brings new evidence for a change in the taxonomy of the Lactobacillus casei group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 21132117.[Abstract]
Fox, G. E., Wisotzkey, J. D. & Jurtshuk, P, Jr. (1992). How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42, 166170.
Galtier, N. & Gouy, M. (1995). Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequences of unequal base compositions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 1131711321.
Hammes, W. P. & Vogel, R. F. (1995). The genus Lactobacillus. In The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria, vol. 2, pp. 1954. Edited by B. J. B. Wood & W. H. Holzapfel. Glasgow: Blackie Academic & Professional.
Kandler, O. & Weiss, N. (1989). Regular, nonsporeforming, Gram-positive rods. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 2, pp. 12081234. Edited by P. H. A. Sneath, N. S. Mair, M. E. Sharpe & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Skerman, V. B. D., McGowan, V. & Sneath, P. H. A. (editors) (1980). Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30, 225420.
Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seelinger, H. P. R. & Clark, W. A. (editors) (1992). International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
Marmur, J. (1961). A procedure for the isolation of DNA from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 3, 208218.
Pot, B., Ludwig, W., Kersters, K. & Schleifer, K.-H. (1994). Taxonomy of lactic acid bacteria. In Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiology, Genetics & Applications, pp. 1390. Edited by L. De Vuyst & E. J. Vandamme. London: Blackie Academic & Professional.
Rogosa, M. & Hansen, P. A. (1971). Nomenclatural consideration of certain species of Lactobacillus Beijerinck. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Bacteriol 21, 177186.
Rogosa, M., Wiseman, R. F., Mitchell, J. A., Disraely, M. N. & Beaman, A. J. (1953). Species differentiation of oral lactobacilli from man including descriptions of Lactobacillus salivarius nov. spec. and Lactobacillus cellobiosus nov. spec. J Bacteriol 65, 681699.
Sriranganathan, N., Seidler, R. J. & Sandine, W. E. (1985). Nucleic acids of species of Lactobacillus. J Dairy Sci 68, 10771086.
Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D. G. (1997). The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24, 48764882.
Torriani, S., Felis, G. E. & Dellaglio, F. (2001). Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA gene-derived primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 34503454.
Van de Peer, Y. & De Wachter, R. (1994). TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput Appl Biosci 10, 569570.
Vescovo, M., Dellaglio, F., Bottazzi, V. & Sarra, P. G. (1979). Deoxyribonucleic acid homology among Lactobacillus species of the subgenus Betabacterium Orla-Jensen. Microbiologica 2, 317330.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Endo, S. Roos, E. Satoh, H. Morita, and S. Okada Lactobacillus equigenerosi sp. nov., a coccoid species isolated from faeces of thoroughbred racehorses Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, April 1, 2008; 58(4): 914 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Camu, T. De Winter, K. Verbrugghe, I. Cleenwerck, P. Vandamme, J. S. Takrama, M. Vancanneyt, and L. De Vuyst Dynamics and Biodiversity of Populations of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Acetic Acid Bacteria Involved in Spontaneous Heap Fermentation of Cocoa Beans in Ghana Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2007; 73(6): 1809 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Felis, M. Vancanneyt, C. Snauwaert, J. Swings, S. Torriani, A. Castioni, and F. Dellaglio Reclassification of Lactobacillus thermotolerans Niamsup et al. 2003 as a later synonym of Lactobacillus ingluviei Baele et al. 2003. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, April 1, 2006; 56(Pt 4): 793 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bringel, A. Castioni, D. K. Olukoya, G. E. Felis, S. Torriani, and F. Dellaglio Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. argentoratensis subsp. nov., isolated from vegetable matrices Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, July 1, 2005; 55(4): 1629 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Rodas, S. Ferrer, and I. Pardo Polyphasic study of wine Lactobacillus strains: taxonomic implications Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, January 1, 2005; 55(1): 197 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |