IJSEM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eribe, E. R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eribe, E. R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eribe, E. R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, I.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54 (2004), 583-592; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.02819-0
© 2004 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Genetic diversity of Leptotrichia and description of Leptotrichia goodfellowii sp. nov., Leptotrichia hofstadii sp. nov., Leptotrichia shahii sp. nov. and Leptotrichia wadei sp. nov.

Emenike R. K. Eribe1, Bruce J. Paster2,3, Dominique A. Caugant1,4, Floyd E. Dewhirst2,3, Verlyn K. Stromberg5, George H. Lacy5 and Ingar Olsen1

1 Institute of Oral Biology, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, POB 1052, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
2 Department of Molecular Genetics, The Forsyth Institute, 140 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3 Department of Oral and Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4 Division for Infectious Disease Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, POB 4404, Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway
5 Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0330, USA

Correspondence
Emenike R. K. Eribe
emenike{at}odont.uio.no


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sixty strains of Gram-negative, anaerobic, rod-shaped bacteria from human sources initially assigned to Leptotrichia buccalis (n=58) and ‘Leptotrichia pseudobuccalis’ (n=2) have been subjected to polyphasic taxonomy. Full-length 16S rDNA sequencing, DNA–DNA hybridization, RAPD, SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins, cellular fatty acid analysis and enzymic/biochemical tests supported the establishment of four novel Leptotrichia species from this collection, Leptotrichia goodfellowii sp. nov. (type strain LB 57T=CCUG 32286T=CIP 107915T), Leptotrichia hofstadii sp. nov. (type strain LB 23T=CCUG 47504T=CIP 107917T), Leptotrichia shahii sp. nov. (type strain LB 37T=CCUG 47503T=CIP 107916T) and Leptotrichia wadei sp. nov. (type strain LB 16T=CCUG 47505T=CIP 107918T). Light and electron microscopy showed that the four novel species were Gram-negative, non-spore-forming and non-motile rods. L. goodfellowii produced arginine dihydrolase, {beta}-galactosidase, N-acetyl-{beta}-glucosaminidase, arginine arylamidase, leucine arylamidase and histidine arylamidase. L. shahii produced {alpha}-arabinosidase. L. buccalis and L. goodfellowii fermented mannose and were {beta}-galactosidase-6-phosphate positive. L. goodfellowii, L. hofstadii and L. wadei were {beta}-haemolytic. L. buccalis fermented raffinose. With L. buccalis, L. goodfellowii showed 3·8–5·5 % DNA–DNA relatedness, L. shahii showed 24·5–34·1 % relatedness, L. hofstadii showed 27·3–36·3 % relatedness and L. wadei showed 24·1–35·9 % relatedness. 16S rDNA sequencing demonstrated that L. hofstadii, L. shahii, L. wadei and L. goodfellowii each formed individual clusters with 97, 96, 94 and 92 % similarity, respectively, to L. buccalis.


Published online ahead of print on 21 November 2003 as DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.02819-0.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rDNA sequences of L. hofstadii LB 23T, L. shahii LB 37T, L. wadei LB 16T and L. goodfellowii LB 57T are AY029803, AY029806, AY029802 and AY029807.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Based on comparative analysis of 16S rRNA sequences, Leptotrichia is one of six genera in the family Fusobacteriaceae in the phylum Fusobacteria. The genus Leptotrichia contains Leptotrichia buccalis, the type species of the genus (Hofstad, 1984Go), and two recently defined species, Leptotrichia trevisanii (Tee et al., 2001Go) and ‘Leptotrichia amnionii’ (Shukla et al., 2002Go). L. trevisanii was isolated from the blood of a man with acute myeloid leukaemia (Tee et al., 2001Go) and ‘L. amnionii from the amniotic fluid of a woman after intrauterine fetal demise (Shukla et al., 2002Go). The closely related species ‘Leptotrichia sanguinegens’ (Hanff et al., 1995aGo) (=‘Leptotrichia microbii’; Hanff et al., 1995bGo) was recently transferred to a new genus Sneathia as Sneathia sanguinegens (Collins et al., 2001Go).

Leptotrichia species are large, fusiform, non-sporulating and non-motile rods with a Gram-negative-like cell wall (Hofstad & Selvig, 1969Go). The primary habitat of Leptotrichia is the human oral cavity, where they are typically found in dental plaque (Hofstad & Olsen, 2004Go). However, Leptotrichia has been also isolated from the normal flora of the periurethral region of healthy girls and the genitalia of women (Moore et al., 1976Go; Söderberg et al., 1979Go; Evaldson et al., 1980Go). L. buccalis or L. buccalis-like bacteria have occasionally been recovered from blood, mostly in immunocompromised patients with neutropenia and from endocarditis (Reig et al., 1985Go; Weinberger et al., 1991Go; Hammann et al., 1993Go; Messiaen et al., 1996Go; Vernelen et al., 1996Go; Patel et al., 1999Go).

The taxonomy of Leptotrichia has been somewhat vague. For example, L. buccalis has often been misclassified as species of Fusobacterium and Lactobacillus (Hamilton & Zahler, 1957Go). Indeed, even within the genus Leptotrichia, there is significant heterogeneity in enzymic/biochemical reactions (Eribe et al., 2002Go) and in cellular fatty acid content (Hofstad & Jantzen, 1982Go; Eribe et al., 2002Go). Furthermore, significant variation among 60 strains of Leptotrichia was observed in SDS-PAGE profiles of whole-cell proteins and RAPD patterns of DNA (Eribe & Olsen, 2002Go). In the present study, these 60 strains were further analysed to examine their full taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity by using full-length 16S rDNA sequencing, DNA–DNA hybridization and colony and cell morphology assessment.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacteria.
The 60 strains of Leptotrichia used, with their site of isolation and source, are listed in Table 1Go. The isolates originated from gingival/periodontal pockets of man, human saliva, dental plaque, supragingival calculus, human synovia, septic arthritis and unknown sources. They fulfilled the novel species requirements for different sources with respect to geography and ecology (Christensen et al., 2001Go). All isolates were received from well-recognized private or public culture collections in Europe and America where they had been characterized.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Strains originally assigned as L. buccalis and ‘L. pseudobuccalis’ used in this study

Original assignments were derived from Eribe et al. (2002)Go: LB, L. buccalis; LPB, ‘L. pseudobuccalis’. Culture collections: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA; VPI, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA; CCUG, Culture Collection of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden. NK, Not known.

 
Cultivation of bacterial strains.
The organisms were inoculated from frozen stock onto Columbia (AppliChem) agar or brain heart infusion (BHI) (AppliChem) agar plates supplemented with 5 % human blood, 50 mg haemin ml-1 (Sigma) and 5 mg menadione ml-1 (Sigma). They were cultured anaerobically (90 % N2, 5 % H2 and 5 % CO2) at 37 °C for 2–5 days in evacuation jars (Anoxomat System, WS9000; Mart). After replating the cultures, single colonies were picked and subcultured anaerobically on Columbia blood agar plates at 37 °C for 2–5 days. After culturing, bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (11 000 r.p.m.) for 5 min and stored at -20 °C if not used immediately.

DNA extraction for 16S rDNA analysis.
DNA was extracted according to the procedure of Popovic et al. (1993)Go with some modifications (Eribe & Olsen, 2000Go). Bacterial DNA was resuspended in 100 µl TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8·0, 1 mM EDTA) and its quality checked spectrophotometrically and by gel electrophoresis.

Amplification of 16S rDNA and purification of PCR products.
The 16S rRNA genes from the examined strains were amplified under standardized conditions with the primers 9F forward and 1541R reverse (Table 2Go). PCR was performed in thin-walled tubes with a Perkin-Elmer 9700 thermocycler. One microlitre of the diluted (1 : 5) DNA template was added to a reaction mixture (50 µl final volume) containing 1x Taq 2000 reaction buffer, 2·5 mM MgCl2, 0·8 µM dNTPs, 400 nM of each primer and 1 U Taq 2000 polymerase (Stratagene) in buffer containing Taqstart antibody (Sigma). In a hot-start protocol, samples were preheated at 94 °C for 4 min followed by amplification under the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 60 °C for 45 s and extension for 1·5 min with an additional 1 s for each cycle. A total of 30 cycles was performed, followed by a final elongation step at 72 °C for 15 min. The products of PCR amplification were examined by electrophoresis in a 1 % agarose gel. DNA was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under short-wavelength UV light. Amplified 16S rRNA genes were purified with the Sequenase kit (Amersham Pharmacia) for partial sequencing and on Sephadex G-50 resin columns before full-length sequencing.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Primers used for amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes

 
16S rDNA sequencing.
Purified DNA from PCR was sequenced with an ABI Prism cycle-sequencing kit (BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase FS; Perkin-Elmer). Quarter-dye chemistry was applied with 3·2 µM primers and 1·5 µl PCR products in a final volume of 20 µl. Cycle sequencing was done with an ABI 9700 PCR machine with 25 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for 10 s and annealing and extension at 60 °C for 4 min. Purified DNA products were dried in a speed vac for 75 min, resuspended in 3·2 µl loading dye and denatured at 98 °C for 2 min. The denatured products were then kept on ice and, finally, 1·5 µl DNA was loaded into the 8 % Long-Ranger polyacrylamide gel (FMC Bioproducts). Sequencing reactions were run on an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer.

Data analyses of 16S rDNA sequences.
First, approximately 410 bases were sequenced to determine the identity or approximate phylogenetic position of the 60 strains. Using six additional sequencing primers (Table 2Go), full sequences (about 1500 bases) were then obtained for 11 representative strains, some of which represented putative novel species. For identification of the closest relatives, the sequences of the unrecognized strains were compared with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of over 9000 bacteria in Paster and Dewhirst's database and 76 000 sequences in the Ribosomal Data Project (RDP) (Cole et al., 2003Go). Similarity matrices were corrected for multiple base changes at single positions by the method of Jukes & Cantor (1969)Go. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbour-joining method of Saitou & Nei (1987)Go. Sequences were aligned using the MegAlign program (DNASTAR) and imported into TREECON, a software package for the Microsoft Windows environment, which was used for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees (Van de Peer et al., 1996Go).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The complete 16S rRNA gene sequences of the novel species were deposited in 2001 in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Fig. 1Go.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences showing positions of L. goodfellowii sp. nov. LB 57T, L. hofstadii sp. nov. LB 23T, L. shahii sp. nov. LB 37T and L. wadei sp. nov. LB 16T. Strains LB 6 and LB 11 have almost identical sequences (99·6 and 97·0 %, respectively) to that of L. trevisanii. Bar, 5 % difference in nucleotide sequences as estimated using the correction of Jukes & Cantor (1969)Go. Distances are determined by measuring the lengths of the horizontal lines connecting two sequences. Numbers at branching points are bootstrap percentages. GenBank accession numbers are given.

 
DNA–DNA relatedness assays.
The S1-nuclease procedure for the free-solution reassociation for DNA similarity assays was used for pairwise reactions (Johnson, 1994Go) with selected strains of Leptotrichia. All procedures, including DNA isolation, French pressure cell fragmentation, hybridization and S1-nuclease assays have been detailed elsewhere (Johnson, 1994Go). However, rather than labelling the probe DNA chemically with 125I, the random primers method was used (Random Primers DNA labelling system; Invitrogen Life Technologies) to label DNA with [{alpha}-33P]dCTP (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences). The probe and target DNAs were reassociated at 66·2±0·5 °C for 24 h for Leptotrichia DNA with a mean G+C content of 29·7 mol% (Tee et al., 2001Go). Values for both homologous and heterologous reassociations were corrected for non-specific heteroduplex formation by control reactions with salmon sperm single-stranded DNA (0 % DNA relatedness) and were less than 10 %. Each reaction was repeated at least three times. The mean of all reactions was reported as percentage DNA–DNA relatedness. DNA from Erwinia amylovora ATCC 29780 (EA 110) was used as the outgroup.

Morphological studies.
Cellular morphology of the novel species was determined by examining cells grown anaerobically at 37 °C on Columbia or BHI blood agar plates. Light microscopy (LM) and transmission (TEM) and scanning (SEM) electron microscopy were used for characterization of cell morphology and ultrastructure. With LM, bacterial cells were also checked for motility in wet mounts and for Gram-staining.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
16S rDNA sequencing
Based on comparisons of nearly complete 16S rDNA sequences, the phylogenetic relationships of the 60 Leptotrichia isolates revealed that there were four putative novel species (Fig. 1Go), namely Leptotrichia goodfellowii sp. nov. (LB 57T), Leptotrichia hofstadii sp. nov. (LB 23T), Leptotrichia shahii sp. nov. (LB 37T) and Leptotrichia wadei sp. nov. (LB 16T). Sequence database searches confirmed that these species were related, but clearly different from each other and from L. buccalis. Strains LB 06 and LB 11, which were essentially identical (Fig. 1Go), had 99·6 and 99·7 % sequence similarity to the recently proposed L. trevisanii (Tee et al., 2001Go).

L. wadei LB 16T, from the saliva of a healthy man, clustered with a previously described strain, A39FD, that was isolated from subgingival plaque (Fig. 1Go). LB 16T had 94 % sequence similarity to L. buccalis.

The type strains of L. hofstadii (LB 23T), L. shahii (LB 37T) and L. goodfellowii (LB 57T) each formed individual clusters that respectively showed 97, 96 and 92 % sequence similarity to L. buccalis. L. hofstadii LB 23T, isolated from the saliva of a healthy man, clustered with a previously described strain (FAC5) that was isolated from dental plaque. L. shahii LB 37T, from dental plaque of a gingivitis patient, clustered with DE081, a previously described phylotype from dental plaque. L. goodfellowii LB 57T was isolated from human blood. Leptotrichia isolates have repeatedly been recovered from cases of bacteraemia (Reig et al., 1985Go; Weinberger et al., 1991Go; Schwartz et al., 1995Go; Patel et al., 1999Go; Tee et al., 2001Go), suggesting that they may be involved in non-oral infections of the body. For example, Leptotrichia has been associated with endocarditis (Duperval et al., 1984Go; Hammann et al., 1993Go), liver abscess (Messiaen et al., 1996Go) and neutropenia in immunocompromised hosts (Reig et al., 1985Go; Baquero et al., 1990Go; Patel et al., 1999Go).

Close relatives of L. goodfellowii were phylotypes EI022 and EI013 (Fig. 1Go), which had been derived from the subgingival pocket of a healthy subject. Each of these phylotypes likely represents additional species.

Clone DA069 (Fig. 1Go) is essentially identical to a novel Leptotrichia-like isolate (accession no. AF182944) from a neutropenic patient (Patel et al., 1999Go), indicating that the source of this species is indeed the oral cavity.

L. sanguinegens’ (=‘L. microbii’) (Hanff et al., 1995aGo, bGo) has recently been reclassified as Sneathia sanguinegens (Collins et al., 2001Go). Our data (Fig. 1Go) suggest that ‘L. amnionii’ would be better assigned to the genus Sneathia than to Leptotrichia.

DNA–DNA relatedness
Phylogenetic relationships of the putative novel species were confirmed by using DNA–DNA relatedness. It has been suggested that differences of >1–2 % between RNA sequences are sufficient to characterize bacteria as taxonomically different. In addition, those organisms that differ by more than 3 % in sequence comparisons rarely display more than 60 % DNA–DNA relatedness (Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994Go). The differences between the sequences of the designated novel species and that of L. buccalis were greater than 3 %.

The S1-nuclease method of free-solution reassociation for DNA similarity assays has been recommended for definition of bacterial species (Steigerwalt et al., 1976Go; Johnson, 1994Go; Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994Go). Six relatedness groups within the genus Leptotrichia were defined (Table 3Go). These relatedness groups correlated well with phylogenetic clustering (Fig. 1Go). The phylogenetic tree (not shown) generated from the DNA–DNA relatedness results of the seven labelled (LB 6, LB 13T, LB 16, LB 23, LB 37T, LB 57T and L. trevisanii LTT) and two unlabelled (LB 11 and EA 110) strains was divided into seven clusters (Table 3Go). One cluster consisted of LB 6, LB 11 and L. trevisanii LTT. 16S rRNA gene sequencing had grouped LB 6 and LB 11 together (Fig. 1Go) and LB 16 and strain A39FD. DNA–DNA relatedness of more than 70 % is a key definition for strains belonging to the same species (Johnson, 1973Go; Steigerwalt et al., 1976Go; Wayne et al., 1987Go; Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994Go). Strains LB 6 and LB 11 showed more than 70 % relatedness with L. trevisanii (Table 3Go) and should be considered strains of this species. There was complete agreement between the 16S rRNA gene sequences and DNA–DNA relatedness results for strains LB 23T, LB 37T and LB 57T. Based on these results, separate species designation of the putative novel species is warranted. The type strain of L. buccalis constituted a cluster by itself and E. amylovora formed an outgroup, as expected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Percentage DNA–DNA relatedness among Leptotrichia species

Species-level (>=70 %) groupings are boxed. E. amylovora was included as an outgroup.

 
The phylogenetic diversity supported previous phenotypic and genotypic data from the same isolates examined for enzymic/biochemical reactions, cellular fatty acid content, SDS-PAGE patterns of whole-cell proteins and RAPD profiles (Eribe et al., 2002Go; Eribe & Olsen, 2002Go). Key characteristics that differentiate these species are listed in Table 4Go. Dendrograms based on 70 % similarity of fingerprints from SDS-PAGE of whole-cell protein and RAPD with primers OPA 3 and OPA 5 (Dendron computer-assisted gel analysis) showed that the novel species were clearly different from each other and from L. buccalis (results not shown). Particularly, DNA–DNA relatedness and SDS-PAGE showed good congruence that supported Vauterin et al. (1993)Go, emphasizing the fitness of protein electrophoresis in bacterial classification. Also, the 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree corresponded well with the SDS-PAGE dendrogram. Thus, our studies demonstrate the value of polyphasic taxonomy for establishing novel bacterial species (Vandamme et al., 1996Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Salient characteristics of Leptotrichia species

Strains: 1, L. buccalis LB 13T; 2, L. goodfellowii LB 57T; 3, L. hofstadii LB 23T; 4, L. shahii LB 37T; 5, L. wadei LB 16T. Data were partly derived from Eribe et al. (2002Go). All strains show optimum growth at 37 °C and are positive for catalase and aesculin. Predominant cellular fatty acids were detected with the Sherlock system; values are percentages of total fatty acids. DMA, Dimethyl acetal; ECL, equivalent chain-length.

 
Morphological studies using LM, SEM and TEM showed that the four novel species had several features in common. They were Gram-negative, non-spore-forming and non-motile rods. Cells were arranged in pairs, some slightly curved, others in chains joined by flattened ends. Electron micrographs of ultrathin sections revealed elongated cells with a cell-wall architecture typical of Gram-negative bacteria. A double plasma membrane layer, a single electron-dense (intermediate) layer, a double outer layer and scale-like protrusions were observed (Fig. 2Goa, c, e and g). A cross-section of the cell showed storage granules. SEM of L. goodfellowii demonstrated short rods, varying in length from 2 to 4 µm and from 0·3 to 0·6 µm in width, with one end tapered (Fig. 2bGo). SEM of L. hofstadii revealed long rods, 7·5–15 µm long and 0·5–0·9 µm wide, with one end tapered (Fig. 2dGo). L. shahii exhibited long rods, 7·5–17·5 µm long and 0·5–0·9 µm wide, with one end tapered (Fig. 2fGo), and L. wadei had short rods, 2·5–10 µm long and 0·3–0·6 µm wide, with one end tapered (Fig. 2hGo).



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. TEM (a, c, e and g) and SEM (b, d, f and h) of cells of novel Leptotrichia species from anaerobic cultures on Columbia blood agar grown at 37 °C for 48 h. (a), (c), (e) and (g) Cross-sectional views of cells of L. goodfellowii sp. nov. LB 57T (a), L. hofstadii sp. nov. LB 23T (c), L. shahii sp. nov. LB 37T (e) and L. wadei sp. nov. LB 16T (g). In (g), cells are visible in both a longitudinal (I) and a cross-sectional (II) view. G, Granule; IDL, intermediate dense layer; IM, inner cytoplasmic membrane; OM, outer membrane; S, septum; SLP, scale-like protrusion. Bars, 0·1 (a, e) and 0·25 (c, g) µm. (b), (d), (f) and (h) Cells from colonies of L. goodfellowii sp. nov. LB 57T (b), L. hofstadii sp. nov. LB 23T (d), L. shahii sp. nov. LB 37T (f) and L. wadei sp. nov. LB 16T (h) showing short (b, h) and long (d, f) rods. Bars, 2 (b) and 10 (d, f, h) µm.

 
Based on the results from enzymic/biochemical reactions, cellular fatty acid analysis, SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins and RAPD (Eribe et al., 2002Go; Eribe & Olsen, 2002Go) and those of the current study related to 16S rDNA sequencing and DNA–DNA relatedness, four previously unrecognized Leptotrichia species could be established. However, it is likely that additional species of Leptotrichia are present in the oral cavity. In sequence analysis of clones of 16S rDNA genes amplified directly from sites in the oral cavity (Paster et al., 2001Go; Becker et al., 2002Go), several not-yet-cultivated species were detected that did not cluster with known species or those described in the present study (Fig. 1Go).

Description of Leptotrichia goodfellowii sp. nov.
Leptotrichia goodfellowii (good.fel'low.i.i. N.L. gen. n. goodfellowii of Goodfellow, named in honour of Mike Goodfellow, for his contributions to microbial systematics).

After 2–6 days of anaerobic incubation at 37 °C, colonies on Columbia or BHI agar plates supplemented with 5 % human blood, haemin and menadione are 0·8–2·0 mm in diameter, speckled, convex, irregular, pink in the periphery and greyish light brown in the rest of the colony. They have a glistening surface, are opaque, dry and {beta}-haemolytic. Catalase positive and aesculin weakly positive. Oxidase and indole are not produced. Colonies grow best anaerobically and sparsely aerobically. Growth occurs at 37 °C but not at 25 or 42 °C; optimal temperature for growth is 37 °C. Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, non-motile rods. Cells are arranged in pairs, some slightly curved, others in chains joined by flattened ends. Arginine dihydrolase, {beta}-galactosidase, {beta}-glucosidase, N-acetyl-{beta}-glucosaminidase, alkaline phosphatase, arginine arylamidase, leucine arylamidase and histidine arylamidase are produced. Mannose is fermented. Additional phenotypic properties are listed in Table 4Go. Isolated from human blood.

The type strain is LB 57T (=CCUG 32286T=CIP 107915T).

Description of Leptotrichia hofstadii sp. nov.
Leptotrichia hofstadii (hof.stad'i.i. N.L. gen. n. hofstadii of Hofstad, named in honour of Tor Hofstad, for his contributions to Leptotrichia taxonomy).

After 2–6 days of anaerobic incubation at 37 °C, colonies on Columbia or BHI agar plates supplemented with 5 % human blood, haemin and menadione are 0·5–1·8 mm in diameter. They have a glistening and granular surface, are opaque, dry and {beta}-haemolytic. Older colonies can be up to 4·0–6·5 mm, circular, convex, entire (some are irregular and lobate) and greyish in colour with a dark central spot. Catalase positive and aesculin weakly positive. Oxidase and indole are not produced. Colonies grow best anaerobically and sparsely aerobically. Growth occurs at 37 °C but not at 25 or 42 °C; optimal temperature is 37 °C. Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, non-motile rods. Cells are arranged in pairs, some slightly curved, others in chains joined by flattened ends. {beta}-Galactosidase-6-phosphate, {alpha}-glucosidase, {beta}-glucosidase and alkaline phosphatase are produced. Mannose is fermented. Additional phenotypic properties are listed in Table 4Go. Isolated from the saliva of a healthy person.

The type strain is LB 23T (=CCUG 47504T=CIP 107917T).

Description of Leptotrichia shahii sp. nov.
Leptotrichia shahii (shah'i.i. N.L. gen. n. shahii of Shah, named in honour of Haroun N. Shah, a Trinidad-born microbiologist, for his contributions to microbiology).

After 2–6 days of anaerobic incubation at 37 °C, colonies on Columbia or BHI agar plates supplemented with 5 % human blood, haemin and menadione are 1·0–1·5 mm in diameter, very filamentous to rhizoid or convoluted, pale-speckled and greyish in colour, with a dark central spot in old colonies. These are opaque, semi-dry in consistency and non-haemolytic. Catalase positive and aesculin weakly positive. Oxidase and indole are not produced. Colonies grow best anaerobically and sparsely aerobically. Growth occurs at 25 and 37 °C but not at 42 °C; optimal temperature is 37 °C. Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, non-motile rods. Cells are arranged in pairs, some slightly curved, others in chains joined by flattened ends. {alpha}-Glucosidase and {alpha}-arabinosidase are produced. Additional phenotypic properties are listed in Table 4Go. Isolated from a patient with gingivitis.

The type strain is LB 37T (=CCUG 47503T=VPI N06A-34T=CIP 107916T).

Description of Leptotrichia wadei sp. nov.
Leptotrichia wadei (wade'i. N.L. gen. n. wadei of Wade, named in honour of William G. Wade, for his contributions to microbiology).

After 2–6 days of anaerobic incubation at 37 °C, colonies on Columbia or BHI agar plates supplemented with 5 % human blood, haemin and menadione are 0·5–3·0 mm in diameter, convex, sparsely filamentous to irregular and greyish brown in colour, with a dark central spot in old colonies. The surface appearance is glistening and smooth with a rough edge. Colonies are opaque, dry in consistency and {beta}-haemolytic. Aesculin and catalase are positive. Oxidase and indole are not produced. Growth occurs best anaerobically and sparsely aerobically at 37 °C but not at 25 or 42 °C. Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, non-motile rods. Cells are arranged in pairs, some slightly curved, others in chains joined by flattened ends. {alpha}-Glucosidase and {beta}-glucosidase are produced. Additional phenotypic properties are listed in Table 4Go. Isolated from the saliva of a healthy person.

The type strain is LB 16T (=CCUG 47505T=CIP 107918T).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We are grateful to W. E. C. Moore (deceased) and L. V. H. Moore, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, to E. Falsen, CCUG Göteborg, Sweden, and to T. Hofstad, The Gade Institute, Bergen, Norway, for their donations of strains. Thanks are also due to T. Alvestad and A.-M. Klem, Division of Infectious Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, and to S. K. Boches and J. L. Galvin, Forsyth Institute, Boston, MA, USA, for their assistance with 16S rDNA sequencing, to R. Hars and S. Stølen, Institute of Oral Biology, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway, for their help with TEM and SEM, respectively, and to Grete Bergaust and Per Gran, Institute of Oral Biology, for their assistance with pictures. This work was financed in part by the Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway, and by grant DE11443 from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Baquero, F., Fernandez, J., Dronda, F., Erice, A., Perez de Oteiza, J., Requera, J. A. & Reig, M. (1990). Capnophilic and anaerobic bacteremia in neutropenic patients: an oral source. Rev Infect Dis 12 (Suppl. 2), S157–S160.

Becker, M. R., Paster, B. J., Leys, E. J., Moeschberger, M. L., Kenyon, S. G., Galvin, J. L., Boches, S. K., Dewhirst, F. E. & Griffen, A. L. (2002). Molecular analysis of bacterial species associated with childhood caries. J Clin Microbiol 40, 1001–1009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christensen, H., Bisgaard, M., Frederiksen, W., Mutters, R., Kuhnert, P. & Olsen, J. E. (2001). Is characterization of a single isolate sufficient for valid publication of a new genus or species? Proposal to modify Recommendation 30b of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 2221–2225.[Abstract]

Cole, J. R., Chai, B., Marsh, T. L. & 8 other authors (2003). The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 442–443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collins, M. D., Hoyles, L., Tornqvist, E., von Essen, R. & Falsen, E. (2001). Characterization of some strains from human clinical sources which resemble "Leptotrichia sanguinegens": description of Sneathia sanguinegens sp. nov., gen. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 24, 358–361.[CrossRef][Medline]

Duperval, R., Béland, S. & Marcoux, J. A. (1984). Infective endocarditis due to Leptotrichia buccalis: a case report. Can Med Assoc J 130, 422–424.[Abstract]

Eribe, E. R. & Olsen, I. (2000). Strain differentiation in Bacteroides fragilis by RAPD and Dendron computer-assisted gel analysis. APMIS 108, 676–684.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eribe, E. R. K. & Olsen, I. (2002). SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses of Leptotrichia isolates. Microb Ecol Health Dis 14, 193–202.[CrossRef]

Eribe, E. R. K., Hofstad, T. & Olsen, I. (2002). Enzymatic/biochemical and cellular fatty acid analyses of Leptotrichia isolates. Microb Ecol Health Dis 14, 137–148.[CrossRef]

Evaldson, G., Carlström, G., Lagrelius, A., Malmborg, A. S. & Nord, C. E. (1980). Microbiological findings in pregnant women with premature rupture of the membranes. Med Microbiol Immunol 168, 238–297.

George, W. L., Kirby, B. D., Sutter, V. L., Citron, D. M. & Finegold, S. M. (1981). Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli: their role in infection and patterns of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. II. Little-known Fusobacterium species and miscellaneous genera. Rev Infect Dis 3, 599–626.[Medline]

Hamilton, R. D. & Zahler, S. A. (1957). A study of Leptotrichia buccalis. J Bacteriol 73, 386–393.[Free Full Text]

Hammann, R., Iwan, A., Brachmann, J., Keller, K. & Werner, A. (1993). Endocarditis caused by a Leptotrichia buccalis-like bacterium in a patient with a prosthetic aortic valve. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 12, 280–282.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hanff, P. A., Rosol-Donoghue, J.-A., Spiegel, C. A., Wilson, K. H. & Moore, L. H. (1995a). Leptotrichia sanguinegens sp. nov., a new agent of postpartum and neonatal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 20, 237–239.

Hanff, P. A., Rosol-Donoghue, J.-A., Spiegel, C. A., Wilson, K. H. & Moore, L. H. (1995b). Sneathia sanguinegens. NCBI Taxonomy Browser. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=40543

Hofstad, T. (1984). Genus III. Leptotrichia Trevisan 1879, 138AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, pp. 637–641. Edited by N. R. Krieg & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Hofstad, T. & Jantzen, E. (1982). Fatty acids of Leptotrichia buccalis: taxonomic implications. J Gen Microbiol 128, 151–153.

Hofstad, T. & Olsen, I. (2004). Fusobacterium and Leptotrichia. In Topley and Wilson's Microbiology and Microbial Infections, 10th edn. Edited by P. Murray & P. Boriello. London: Edward Arnold (in press).

Hofstad, T. & Selvig, K. A. (1969). Ultrastructure of Leptotrichia buccalis. J Gen Microbiol 56, 23–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johnson, J. L. (1973). Use of nucleic-acid homologies in the taxonomy of anaerobic bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 23, 308–315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johnson, J. L. (1994). Similarity analysis of DNAs. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, pp. 655–682. Edited by P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood & N. R. Krieg. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, C. R. (1969). Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, pp. 21–132. Edited by H. N. Munro. New York: Academic Press.

Messiaen, T., Lefebvre, C. & Geubel, A. (1996). Hepatic abscess likely related to Leptotrichia buccalis in an immunocompetent patient. Liver 16, 342–343.[Medline]

Moore, W. E. C., Johnson, J. L. & Holdeman, L. V. (1976). Emendation of Bacteroidaceae and Butyrivibrio and descriptions of Desulfomonas gen. nov. and ten new species in the genera Desulfomonas, Butyrivibrio, Eubacterium, Clostridium, and Ruminococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 26, 238–252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paster, B. J., Boches, S. K., Galvin, J. L., Ericson, R. E., Lau, C. N., Levanos, V. A., Sahasrabudhe, A. & Dewhirst, F. E. (2001). Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol 183, 3770–3783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Patel, J. B., Clarridge, J., Schuster, M. S., Waddington, M., Osborne, J. & Nachamkin, I. (1999). Bacteremia caused by a novel isolate resembling Leptotrichia species in a neutropenic patient. J Clin Microbiol 37, 2064–2067.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Popovic, T., Bopp, C. A., Olsvik, Ø. & Kiehlbauch, J. A. (1993). Ribotyping in molecular microbiology. In Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology, pp. 573–584. Edited by D. H. Persing, T. F. Smith, F. C. Tenover & T. J. White. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Reig, M., Baquero, F., Garcia-Campello, M. & Loza, E. (1985). Leptotrichia buccalis bacteremia in neutropenic children. J Clin Microbiol 22, 320–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425.[Abstract]

Schwartz, D. N., Schable, B., Tenover, F. C. & Miller, R. A. (1995). Leptotrichia buccalis bacteremia in patients treated in a single bone marrow transplant unit. Clin Infect Dis 20, 762–767.[Medline]

Shukla, S. K., Meier, P. R., Mitchell, P. D., Frank, D. N. & Reed, K. D. (2002). Leptotrichia amnionii sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from the amniotic fluid of a woman after intrauterine fetal demise. J Clin Microbiol 40, 3346–3349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Söderberg, G., Lindberg, A. A. & Nord, C. E. (1979). Bacteroides fragilis in acute salpingitis. Infection 7, 226–230.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. (1994). Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 846–849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Steigerwalt, A. G., Fanning, G. R., Fife-Asbury, M. A. & Brenner, D. J. (1976). DNA relatedness among species of Enterobacter and Serratia. Can J Microbiol 22, 121–137.[Medline]

Tee, W., Midolo, P., Janssen, P. H., Kerr, T. & Dyall-Smith, M. L. (2001). Bacteremia due to Leptotrichia trevisanii sp. nov. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20, 765–769.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vandamme, P., Pot, B., Gillis, M., de Vos, P., Kersters, K. & Swings, J. (1996). Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev 60, 407–438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van de Peer, Y., Nicolaï, S., De Rijk, P. & De Wachter, R. (1996). Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 24, 86–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vauterin, L., Swings, J. & Kersters, K. (1993). Protein electrophoresis and classification. In Handbook of New Bacterial Systematics, pp. 251–280. Edited by M. Goodfellow & A. G. O'Donnell. London: Academic Press.

Vernelen, K., Mertens, I., Thomas, J., Vandeven, J., Verhaegen, J. & Verbist, L. (1996). Bacteremia with Leptotrichia buccalis: report of a case and review of the literature. Acta Clin Belg 51, 265–270.[Medline]

Wayne, L. G., Brenner, D. J., Colwell, R. R. & 9 other authors (1987). Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 463–464.

Weinberger, M., Wu, T., Rubin, M., Gill, V. J. & Pizzo, P. A. (1991). Leptotrichia buccalis bacteremia in patients with cancer: report of four cases and review. Rev Infect Dis 13, 201–206.[Medline]

Woese, C. R., Gutell, R., Gupta, R. & Noller, H. F. (1983). Detailed analysis of the higher-order structure of the 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids. Microbiol Rev 47, 621–669.[Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
C. M. Thilesen, M. Nicolaidis, J. E. Lokebo, E. Falsen, A. T. Jorde, and F. Muller
Leptotrichia amnionii, an Emerging Pathogen of the Female Urogenital Tract
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2007; 45(7): 2344 - 2347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eribe, E. R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eribe, E. R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eribe, E. R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, I.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS