IJSEM Visit JGV Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full phylogenetic tree
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gardan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, P.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54 (2004), 107-113; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.02718-0
© 2004 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Erwinia papayae sp. nov., a pathogen of papaya (Carica papaya)

Louis Gardan1, Richard Christen2, Wafa Achouak3 and Philippe Prior4

1 UMR de Pathologie Végétale INRA-INH-UNIVERSITE, BP 57, 42 rue G. Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé, France
2 UMR 6543 CNRS and Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Centre de biochimie, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice cedex 2, France
3 CEA/Cadarache, DSV-DEVM, LEMIR, UMR 163 CNRS-CEA-Univ. Méditerranée, Saint Paul-lez-Durance, France
4 INRA, Station de Pathologie Végétale, Domaine St Maurice, BP 94, 84143, Montfavet, France

Correspondence
Louis Gardan
gardan{at}angers.inra.fr


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial canker of papaya (Carica papaya) emerged during the 1980s in different islands of the Caribbean. Nineteen strains of Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-spore-forming bacteria isolated from papaya were compared to 38 reference and type strains of phytopathogenic Enterobacteriaceae and related bacteria. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the papaya strains belonged to the genus Erwinia. The DNA G+C content of strain CFBP 5189T, 52·5 mol%, is in the range of the genus Erwinia. The 19 papaya strains were all pathogenic to papaya and were differentiated clearly from type or reference strains of phytopathogenic enterobacteria and related bacteria by phenotypic tests. The papaya strains constituted a discrete DNA hybridization group, indicating that they belonged to a unique genomic species. Thus, strains pathogenic to papaya belong to a novel species for which the name Erwinia papayae sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain CFBP 5189T (=NCPPB 4294T).


Abbreviations: ML, maximum-parsimony; ML, maximum-likelihood; NJ, neighbour-joining

Published online ahead of print on 4 July 2003 as DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.02718-0.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of CFBP 5189T is AY131237.

A full phylogenetic tree is available as supplementary material in IJSEM Online.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Papaya (Carica papaya) is an economically important tropical cash crop for export, as well as a significant vegetable crop in small farming systems worldwide. Early in the 20th century, a disease caused by ‘Bacillus papaya’ in Java (von Rant, 1931Go) was identified; this bacterium was further typed to the genus Erwinia by Magrou (1937)Go. Nelson & Alvarez (1980)Go described a purple stain of Carica papaya, due to Erwinia herbicola. More recently, Trujillo & Schroth (1982)Go reported a bacterial decline of papaya caused by two Erwinia species in the Mariana Islands. Finally, reports from Webb (1985)Go in the US Virgin Islands, from Frossard et al. (1985)Go and Prior et al. (1985)Go in the French West Indies and from Guevara et al. (1993)Go in Venezuela, all consistently described this disease, which was named ‘bacterial stem canker’. Typical symptoms of bacterial stem cankers on Solo-type cultivars include greasy, water-soaked lesions and spots on leaves, which evolve into foliar, angular lesions. Firm, water-soaked cankers develop on the stem, sometimes leading to the destruction of papaya trees (Prior et al., 1985Go; Webb, 1985Go).

Preliminary identification of this novel bacterium by classical phenotypic tests led Trujillo & Schroth (1982)Go, Frossard et al. (1985)Go, Prior et al. (1985)Go and Webb (1985)Go to place this bacterium in the genus Erwinia and in the Amylovora group according to Dye (1968)Go. In order to clarify the taxonomic status of this phytopathogenic bacterium, we developed a polyphasic taxonomic study.

Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from water-soaked lesions and were typically slow-growing, giving colonies of 2–3 mm diameter after 3–4 days incubation. Colonies were hyaline on YBGA (0·7 % yeast extract, 0·7 % bactopeptone, 0·7 % glucose and 1·5 % agar, pH 7·2) or on King's medium B at 25 °C, with a mucoid aspect and white to creamy white colour after 2–3 days. A non-diffusible blue pigment was observed on King's medium B.

This study included a selection of 19 strains from a collection of 72 strains that were isolated in 1982–1991 from Carica papaya in different islands of the Caribbean (Table 1Go) and 38 type or reference strains of phytopathogenic Enterobacteriaceae that belong to the genera Erwinia, Enterobacter, Brenneria, Pantoea, Pectobacterium and Samsonia.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Strains of Erwinia sp. isolated from Carica papaya lesions used in this study

 
Pathogenicity of papaya isolates was assessed on Solo-type cultivars following inoculation with a sterile needle; this consisted of wound inoculation at the apex of young seedlings with 50 µl calibrated suspension at 108 c.f.u. ml-1. Infected plants were grown under greenhouse conditions (25–30 °C in the day/23–25 °C at night and a photoperiod of 6 h).

We used 121 phenotypic tests, including 22 conventional tests and assimilation of 99 carbon sources by using Biotype 100 strips (bioMérieux), as described previously (Gardan et al., 2002Go). A distance matrix was calculated by using the Jaccard coefficient and cluster analysis was done by using UPGMA (Sneath & Sokal, 1973Go). Discriminative tests were selected by using a diagnostic ability coefficient that was deduced from the numerical analysis (Descamp & Véron, 1981Go).

Selection of related sequences was performed according to previous phylogenetic analyses of a database of 62 000 already aligned bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences and BLAST searches against the latest release of EBI (European Bioinformatics Institute). The new sequence was aligned manually by using SeaView (Galtier et al., 1996Go). In a preliminary analysis, 150 sequences were selected. A phylogenetic tree of 32 sequences was then built, including a sequence for each type strain of species of the genera Erwinia and Pantoea that were available, as well as representatives of the genera Brenneria, Pectobacterium and Samsonia. Sequences from three Pantoea species that do not yet have validly published names (‘Pantoea oleae’, ‘Pantoea cedenensis and ‘Pantoea toletana’) were also included for completeness of the analysis. Phylogenetic trees were then constructed by using three different methods: neighbour-joining (NJ) by using BIONJ (Gascuel, 1997Go), maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP). For the BIONJ analysis, distance matrices were calculated by using Kimura's two-parameter correction. ML and MP were from PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3.573c; distributed by J. Felsenstein, Department of Genetics, UW, Seattle, WA, USA). Almost-entire sequences that corresponded to positions 74–1436 of strain CFBP 5189T were used for these analyses (shown in Fig. 1Go and Supplementary Fig. A in IJSEM Online). Phylogenetic trees were drawn by using NJPLOT (Perrière & Gouy, 1996Go). The topology shown is that of the bootstrap tree, as it has been demonstrated that this topology is often better than that of a simple tree (Berry & Gascuel, 1996Go). There is no distance bar in Fig. 1Go; it would be meaningless as (i) distances are corrected (see above) and (ii) this is a bootstrap tree.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Rooted tree, subset of a larger tree (available as supplementary material in IJSEM Online), resulting from a neighbour-joining bootstrap analysis (1000 replications). Bootstrap percentages are indicated only for branches that were also retrieved by MP (strict consensus of six equally parsimonious trees) and ML at P<0·01, therefore indicating robust clades. For ML analysis, ln(likelihood) was -6492 and 4370 trees were examined.

 
Extraction and purification of DNA were performed as described by Brenner et al. (1982)Go. Native DNA of strain CFBP 5189T was labelled in vitro by nick-translation with tritium-labelled nucleotides (Amersham Biosciences). The S1 nuclease/trichloroacetic method was used for DNA–DNA hybridization (Crosa et al., 1973Go). DNA reassociation was performed at 65 °C.

The DNA G+C content of strain CFBP 5189T was determined by the thermal denaturation method of Marmur & Doty (1962)Go and calculated by using the equation of Owen & Lapage (1976)Go.

Isolates that gave a positive reaction induced water-soaked, greasy spots around the inoculation point, 5–7 days after inoculation. These water-soaked lesions developed into stem cankers, mainly due to secondary invaders. Death occurred about 3 weeks after inoculation. Thus, all symptoms observed under field conditions were reproduced and the original bacteria could be reisolated consistently as pure cultures from water-soaked necroses.

A dendrogram of phenotypic distances among the 57 strains is shown in Fig. 2Go. At a distance of 0·419, six phenons and four isolated strains were delineated. Phenon 4 corresponded to the 19 strains isolated from papaya and Erwinia mallotivora CFBP 2503T. Phenons 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, each of which contained between two and nine strains, corresponded to type and reference strains of phytopathogenic Enterobacteriaceae. Phenotypic characteristics that differentiate the papaya strains from other reference strains are shown in Table 2Go. Numerous tests are available to identify the papaya strains, as they used only some carbon sources in comparison with most other strains characterized in this study (an exception is Erwinia tracheiphila). Like Erwinia amylovora, this novel bacterium requires growth factors; Prior et al. (1985)Go supplemented growth media with yeast extract. The papaya strains are differentiated clearly from E. mallotivora by their ability to assimilate L-(+)-arabinose and D-glucosamine, but not mannitol or DL-lactate, and to reduce sucrose compounds; the reverse reactions were obtained for E. mallotivora (Table 2Go). Strain-dependent reactions for papaya strains were observed for utilization of cis-aconitate (four strains), mucate (five strains), galacturonate (11 strains) and citrate (five strains). Phenon 4, which contained the papaya strains, was split into two subphena by E. mallotivora. Strains of different origins (several islands) are clustered in the same subphenon and, conversely, strains of one origin (one island, e.g. Guadeloupe, France) are clustered in different subphena; thus, we did not observe a correlation between geographical origin and clustering in the two subphena. Papaya strains evolved all over the Caribbean, which is also the diversification centre for Carica papaya; such restricted environments are well-known to develop particular traits in terms of population genetics, but we have no likely hypothesis to explain why the papaya strains were split into two subphena.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. UPGMA-based dendrogram of phenotypic characteristics of the 57 strains (numbers indicate CFBP accession numbers). Distance, 1-Jaccard coefficient.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Phenotypic characteristics that differentiate phenons and strains

+, 90–100 % of strains are positive; -, 90–100 % of strains are negative; D, 11–89 % of strains are positive (percentage of positive strains is given in parentheses).

 
Detailed scrutiny of the phylogenetic tree, which is the consensus of all three methods (NJ, MP and ML), showed that papaya strain CFBP 5189T formed a robust clade with the type strain of E. mallotivora (all methods; bootstrap value, 94 %; 98·6 % sequence similarity; 20 nucleotide differences). Both strains were also grouped with all other Erwinia species in a robust clade (all methods; bootstrap value, 67 %) with Pectobacterium cypripedii as a sister taxon. The three species without validly published names, ‘Pantoea oleae’, ‘Pantoea cedenensis’ and ‘Pantoea toletana’, clearly belong to the genus Erwinia and should be named adequately. A sequence retrieved from GenBank as the type strain of Erwinia herbicola did not belong to this clade (see Supplementary Fig. A), but analysis of the literature (Gavini et al., 1989Go) demonstrated that this species had to be reassigned as Pantoea agglomerans, as supported by our phylogenetic analysis. In conclusion, the novel bacterium belongs phylogenetically to the genus Erwinia; DNA–DNA hybridization data are necessary to decide whether or not it constitutes a distinct species.

DNA–DNA reassociation results are shown in Table 3Go. The 19 papaya strains were 67–100 % related to strain CFBP 5189T (mean, 82·3±10·2 %). E. mallotivora CFBP 2503T was 44 % related to strain CFBP 5189T and was the most closely related organism to the papaya strains. The rest of the type and reference strains of phytopathogenic Enterobacteriaceae were 2–18 % related to strain CFBP 5189T. Thus, the papaya strains constitute a homogeneous genomic group at the species level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Levels of DNA reassociation among strains of Erwinia papayae and reference or pathotype strains of the genera Samsonia, Pectobacterium, Brenneria and Pantoea

Values are relative binding (%, with SD in parentheses) with labelled DNA from Erwinia papayae CFBP 5189T.

 
The DNA G+C content of strain CFBP 5189T was 52·5 mol%. This G+C content is in the range of the genus Erwinia (49·8–54·1 mol%) (Hauben et al., 1998Go).

All these results correspond to the definition of bacterial species according to Wayne et al. (1987)Go and we propose the name Erwinia papayae sp. nov. for this novel bacterium that is pathogenic to Carica papaya.

Description of Erwinia papayae sp. nov.
Erwinia papayae (pa.pa'yae. N.L. gen. n. papayae of papaya, the host plant from which the organism was isolated).

This species has the characteristics of the genus Erwinia. Colonies on YBGA are hyaline and 2–3 mm in size after 3–4 days incubation at 25 °C. A non-diffusible blue pigment is produced on King's medium B. Growth occurs at 28 °C, but not at 36 or 39 °C; sucrose-reducing compounds are produced. In addition to the characteristics mentioned in Table 2Go, {beta}-D-(+)-fructose, D-(+)-galactose, D-(+)-mannose, sucrose, D-(-)-ribose, glycerol, N-acetylglucosamine and D-gluconate are utilized; strains do not assimilate 73 of 100 carbon sources of the Biotype 100 gallery (bioMérieux). DNA G+C content of the type strain is 52·5 mol%.

The type strain is CFBP 5189T (=NCPPB 4294T). Strains of Erwinia papayae cause bacterial canker of papaya.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Berry, V. & Gascuel, O. (1996). On the interpretation of bootstrap trees: appropriate threshold of clade selection and induced gain. Mol Biol Evol 13, 999–1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brenner, D. J., McWhorter, A. C., Knutson, J. K. & Steigerwalt, A. G. (1982). Escherichia vulneris: a new species of Enterobacteriaceae associated with human wounds. J Clin Microbiol 15, 1133–1140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crosa, J. H., Brenner, D. J. & Falkow, S. (1973). Use of a single-strand-specific nuclease for analysis of bacterial and plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid homo- and heteroduplexes. J Bacteriol 115, 904–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Descamp, P. & Véron, M. (1981). Une méthode de choix des caractères d'identification basée sur le théorème de Bayes et la mesure de l'information. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 132B, 157–170 (in French).

Dye, D. W. (1968). A taxonomic study of the genus Erwinia. I. The "Amylovora" group. N Z J Sci 11, 590–607.

Frossard, P., Hugon, R. & Vernière, C. H. (1985). Un dépérissement du papayer aux Antilles Françaises associé à un Erwinia sp. du groupe amylovora. Fruits 40, 583–595 (in French).

Galtier, N., Gouy, M. & Gautier, C. (1996). SeaView and Phylo_win, two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci 12, 543–548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gardan, L., Gouy, C., Christen, R. & Samson, R. (2002). Elevation of three subspecies of Pectobacterium carotovorum to species level: Pectobacterium atrosepticum sp. nov., Pectobacterium betavasculorum sp. nov. and Pectobacterium wasabiae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 381–391.

Gascuel, O. (1997). BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 14, 685–695.[Abstract]

Gavini, F., Mergaert, J., Beji, A., Mielcarek, C., Izard, D., Kersters, K. & de Ley, J. (1989). Transfer of Enterobacter agglomerans (Beijerinck 1888) Ewing and Fife 1972 to Pantoea gen. nov. as Pantoea agglomerans comb. nov. and description of Pantoea dispersa sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 337–345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guevara, Y., Rondon, A., Maselli, A., Salcedo, F. & Betancourt, J. (1993). Marchitez bacteriana del lechosero Carica papaya L. en Venezuela. Agron Trop (Maracay) 43, 107–116 (in Spanish).

Hauben, L., Moore, E. R. B., Vauterin, L., Steenackers, M., Mergaert, J., Verdonck, L. & Swings, J. (1998). Phylogenetic position of phytopathogens within the Enterobacteriaceae. Syst Appl Microbiol 21, 384–397.[Medline]

Magrou, J. (1937). In Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes pour l'Homme, les Animaux et les Plantes, p. 241. Edited by P. Hauduroy, G. Ehrdinger, A. Urbain, G. Guillot & J. Magrou. Paris: Masson & Cie (in French).

Marmur, J. & Doty, P. (1962). Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol 5, 109–118.[Medline]

Nelson, M. N. & Alvarez, A. M. (1980). Purple stain of Carica papaya. Plant Disease 64, 93–95.

Owen, R. J. & Lapage, S. P. (1976). The thermal denaturation of partly purified bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid and its taxonomic implications. J Appl Bacteriol 41, 335–340.[Medline]

Perrière, G. & Gouy, M. (1996). WWW-Query: an on-line retrieval system for biological sequence banks. Biochimie 78, 364–369.[Medline]

Prior, P., Béramis, M. & Rousseau, M. T. (1985). Le dépérissement bactérien du papayer aux Antilles françaises. Agronomie 5, 877–885 (in French).

Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: Freeman.

Trujillo, E. E. & Schroth, M. N. (1982). Two bacterial diseases of papaya trees caused by Erwinia species in the northern Mariana Islands. Plant Dis 66, 116–120.

von Rant, A. (1931). Über eine Bakterienkrankheit bei dem Melonenbaume (Carica papaya L.) auf Java. Zentbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektkrankh Hyg 84, 481–487 (in German).

Wayne, L. G., Brenner, D. J., Colwell, R. R. & 9 other authors (1987). International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 463–464.[Free Full Text]

Webb, R. R. (1985). Epidemiology and control of bacterial canker of papaya caused by an Erwinia sp. on St Croix, US Virgin Islands. Plant Dis 69, 305–309.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full phylogenetic tree
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gardan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS