IJSEM Journal of Bacteriology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nemec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaneechoutte, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nemec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaneechoutte, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nemec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaneechoutte, M.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53 (2003), 1563-1567; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.02631-0
© 2003 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Acinetobacter parvus sp. nov., a small-colony-forming species isolated from human clinical specimens

Alexandr Nemec1, Lenie Dijkshoorn2, Ilse Cleenwerck3, Thierry De Baere4, Danielle Janssens3, Tanny J. K. van der Reijden2, Petr Jezek5 and Mario Vaneechoutte4

1 National Institute of Public Health, Srobárova 48, 100 42 Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center C5-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
3 BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, University of Ghent, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
4 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University Hospital, Blok A, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
5 Department of Clinical Microbiology, U nemocnice 85, Príbram, Czech Republic

Correspondence
Alexandr Nemec
anemec{at}szu.cz


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
The taxonomic status of seven glucose-non-acidifying, non-proteolytic Acinetobacter strains characterized by forming small colonies on agar media was studied. With one exception, all strains were from human specimens. They could be distinguished from all described Acinetobacter (genomic) species by their ability to grow on ethanol and acetate as sole sources of carbon but not on 22 other substrates tested including DL-lactate or DL-4-aminobutyrate. DNA–DNA hybridization studies, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, amplified rDNA restriction analysis and DNA polymorphism analysis by AFLP showed that these strains represent a hitherto unknown species of the genus Acinetobacter, for which the name Acinetobacter parvus (type strain LMG 21765T=LUH 4616T=NIPH 384T=CCM 7030T) is proposed.


Abbreviations: ARDRA, amplified rDNA restriction analysis

Published online ahead of print on 20 June 2003 as DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.02631-0.

The EMBL accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of Acinetobacter parvus LMG 21765T and LMG 21766 are AJ293691 and AJ293690, respectively.


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
The genus Acinetobacter comprises non-motile, strictly aerobic, oxidase-negative, Gram-negative bacteria that grow well on simple media. Twenty-four (genomic) species are currently recognized within the genus (Bouvet & Grimont, 1986Go; Tjernberg & Ursing, 1989Go; Bouvet & Jeanjean, 1989Go; Gerner-Smidt & Tjernberg, 1993Go; Vaneechoutte et al., 1999Go; Nemec et al., 2001Go) and strains of these species usually form colonies of 1·0–2·0 mm in diameter after 24 h incubation under optimum growth conditions (Bouvet & Grimont, 1986Go; Nemec et al., 2001Go). In a taxonomic study of Acinetobacter clinical isolates (Nemec et al., 2000Go), two strains were found which formed notably small colonies on routine agar media and could not be identified as any known (genomic) species. These strains were glucose-non-acidifying, non-proteolytic, did not utilize any of the 14 carbon sources of the identification scheme of Bouvet & Grimont (1987)Go and had highly similar amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) profiles. Later, five strains similar to the two strains were found among archive strains in our collections. The aim of the present study was to define the taxonomic status of these strains by a polyphasic analysis.

The seven strains used in this study are listed in Table 1Go. All had the properties of the genus Acinetobacter (Juni, 1984Go), i.e. they were Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, oxidase-negative, non-motile coccobacilli, and were positive in the transformation assay of Juni (1972)Go. The methods for genotypic characterization included ARDRA, AFLP fingerprinting and comparative 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Phenotypic characterization was done essentially according to Bouvet & Grimont (1987)Go and Gerner-Smidt et al. (1991)Go, with some modifications. Details of the methods and their interpretative criteria have been given by Dijkshoorn et al. (1998)Go and Nemec et al. (2000Go, 2001)Go. The assimilation tests were performed in tubes containing the fluid medium of Cruze et al. (1979)Go supplemented with 0·1 % (w/v) carbon source. Results were read after 2, 6 and 10 days incubation at 30 °C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Strains of Acinetobacter parvus used in this study

CCM, Czech Collection of Microorganisms, Brno, Czech Republic; LMG, Bacteria Collection, Laboratorium voor Microbiologie Gent, Gent, Belgium; LUH and RUH, Collection L. Dijkshoorn, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; NIPH, Collection A. Nemec, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic; CZ, Czech Republic; NL, The Netherlands.

 
High-molecular-mass DNA for determination of the G+C content and for DNA–DNA hybridization was prepared from cells grown aerobically on Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA; Oxoid) at 28 °C by the method of Wilson (1987)Go, with minor modifications. Strains Acinetobacter haemolyticus LMG 996T, Acinetobacter baumannii LMG 1041T, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus LMG 1046T and ‘Acinetobacter venetianus’ LMG 19082, which produced large amounts of exopolysaccharides, were subjected to a mild alkaline hydrolysis step before cell lysis, as described by Willems et al. (2001)Go. The G+C content of the DNA was determined by HPLC according to the method of Mesbah et al. (1989)Go. Non-methylated phage {lambda} DNA (Sigma) was used as the calibration reference. DNA–DNA hybridizations were performed using a modification of the microplate method described by Ezaki et al. (1989)Go and Goris et al. (1998)Go. Hybridizations were performed at 37 °C in a hybridization solution [2xSSC, 5xDenhardt's solution, 50 % (v/v) formamide, 2·5 % (w/v) dextran sulfate, low-molecular-mass denatured salmon sperm DNA to a final concentration of 100 µg ml-1, 1·25 µg biotinylated probe DNA ml-1]. The DNA–DNA relatedness percentages presented are means based on at least two hybridization experiments. Reciprocal reactions (e.g. AxB and BxA) were performed and the variation between them was within the limit of this method (Goris et al., 1998Go).

Colonies of all strains grown on TSA or Nutrient Agar (NA; Oxoid) were circular, convex, smooth and slightly opaque with entire margins. These colonies were notably smaller than those of the other described Acinetobacter species (Fig. 1Go). On NA, the colonies were 0·1–0·4 mm and 0·3–0·9 mm in diameter after 24 and 48 h incubation at 30 °C, respectively, while on TSA, the colonies were 0·3–0·7 mm and 1·0–1·4 mm in diameter after 24 and 48 h of incubation at 30 °C, respectively. The use of other agar media including chocolate and blood agar did not significantly affect colony size as compared with TSA.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Colonies of Acinetobacter parvus and the type strains of selected Acinetobacter species. (a) A. parvus LMG 21765T; (b) Acinetobacter ursingii LUH 3792T; (c) Acinetobacter lwoffii ATCC 15309T; (d) A. johnsonii ATCC 17909T; (e) A. junii ATCC 17908T; (f) Acinetobacter schindleri LUH 5832T. The strains were grown on TSA at 30 °C for 24 h. Bars, 2 mm.

 
All strains grew in Brain–Heart Infusion (Difco) broth at temperatures ranging from 25 to 35 °C but not at 41 °C. All but one strain (LMG 21766) grew at 37 °C, although the growth of LUH 3067 and RUH 2008 was reduced at this temperature as compared to growth at 30 °C. All strains utilized ethanol and acetate as sole sources of carbon and energy and their growth on these two substrates was clear after 2 days incubation. All strains were negative in the following tests: acid production from D-glucose, haemolysis of sheep blood, gelatinase production, and the utilization of DL-lactate, DL-4-aminobutyrate, trans-aconitate, citrate (Simmons), glutarate, L-aspartate, azelate, {beta}-alanine, L-histidine, D-malate, malonate, histamine, L-phenylalanine, phenylacetate, levulinate, citraconate, 4-hydroxybenzoate, L-tartrate, L-ornithine, L-leucine, L-arabinose and 2,3-butanediol.

The result of the comparative analysis of AFLP patterns of the seven strains and type and reference strains of all described Acinetobacter (genomic) species is shown in Fig. 2Go. The seven strains grouped at 63 %, which is well above the 50 % level seen in previous studies for the delineation of Acinetobacter species (Nemec et al., 2001Go). They were clearly separated from the other Acinetobacter (genomic) species (each species represented by one strain) at 34 %.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dendrogram of cluster analysis of AFLP fingerprints of seven strains of Acinetobacter parvus and 24 strains representing all known (genomic) species of the genus Acinetobacter. Fingerprints were generated using automated laser fluorescence detection and cluster analysis was performed with the BIONUMERICS software package (Applied Maths) using Pearson's product for similarity calculation and UPGMA for clustering (Nemec et al., 2001Go).

 
The 16S rDNA sequences of strains LMG 21765T and LMG 21766 (EMBL accession nos AJ293691 and AJ293690, respectively) showed 99·8 % similarity. The similarity values between these sequences and those of the other 24 (genomic) species of the genus Acinetobacter (EMBL accession nos Z93434Z93454, AJ275038, AJ278311 and AJ295007) were in the range of 95·9–98·1 %, which corresponds to the interspecies similarity values of the genus Acinetobacter (Ibrahim et al., 1997Go; Nemec et al., 2001Go).

Structural homogeneity of 16S rDNA was confirmed by ARDRA. All strains had identical or almost identical restriction patterns: CfoI 1 (LMG 21765T, LUH 3067, LMG 21766 and RUH 2714) or CfoI 1+5 (RUH 2008, LUH 4619 and LUH 7036), AluI 2, MboI 1, RsaI 2 and MspI 3.

DNA–DNA relatedness was determined between LMG 21765T, LMG 21766 and the type strains of the nomenspecies that had shown highest similarity (>96·5 %) of 16S rDNA sequences with the two strains (Table 2Go). The level of DNA–DNA binding between LMG 21765T and LMG 21766 was 82 %. DNA–DNA binding values between these strains and the type strains of Acinetobacter junii, A. haemolyticus, A. baumannii, Acinetobacter johnsonii, A. calcoaceticus and the reference strain of ‘A. venetianus’ were not higher than 35 %. The DNA G+C content of LMG 21765T and LMG 21766 was 41·8 and 41·5 %, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. DNA–DNA binding values (%) between LMG 21765T, LMG 21766 and strains of related Acinetobacter species

 
On the basis of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, it is proposed that the seven small-colony-forming strains represent a hitherto unknown species of the genus Acinetobacter, for which the name Acinetobacter parvus is proposed.

A. parvus can be differentiated from other Acinetobacter (genomic) species by its negative results in biochemical tests suggested by Bouvet & Grimont (1987)Go, in particular by the inability to oxidize D-glucose, to hydrolyse gelatin and to utilize DL-lactate, DL-4-aminobutyrate, citrate (Simmons), azelate, {beta}-alanine and L-histidine (Bouvet & Grimont, 1987Go; Bouvet & Jeanjean, 1989Go; Gerner-Smidt et al., 1991Go; Vaneechoutte et al., 1999Go; Nemec et al., 2001Go). The acetate utilization test which is positive in A. parvus is necessary to differentiate prototrophic A. parvus strains from auxotrophic strains of other Acinetobacter (genomic) species. Notably, its typical colony size is an important feature to recognize A. parvus amidst colonies of other species and genera, and to differentiate it from biochemically inactive strains of other Acinetobacter (genomic) species.

ARDRA allowed for differentiation of A. parvus from all described (genomic) species of Acinetobacter, except A. junii and proteolytic genomic species 17 (Dijkshoorn et al., 1998Go; Vaneechoutte et al., 1999Go; Nemec et al., 2001Go). Four A. parvus strains had the same ARDRA combination pattern (CfoI 1, AluI 2, MboI 1, RsaI 2, MspI 3) as the latter two (genomic) species. However, A. parvus strains can easily be distinguished from genomic species 17 and A. junii strains sharing this ARDRA profile by their small colonies and the inability to lyse sheep erythrocytes.

The A. parvus strains were isolated from human and animal non-sterile body sites, except for RUH 2008, which originated from the blood of a human. Isolation of this strain was followed by other isolates with similar characteristics from intravenous catheters, which indicates that the strain was involved in a catheter-related blood-stream infection. Strain LUH 7036 was isolated from the ear of a dog with refractory otitis media.

During this study, an additional strain (LUH 4826) that was phenotypically indistinguishable from the A. parvus strains was isolated from a human clinical specimen. However, LUH 4826 had AluI and RsaI ARDRA patterns different from those of the A. parvus strains and AFLP fingerprinting showed no significant similarity between this strain and any of the described Acinetobacter (genomic) species including A. parvus (not shown). Therefore, LUH 4826 may represent an as-yet-undescribed species of the genus Acinetobacter that is phenotypically similar to A. parvus. This finding demonstrates that, as is the case with most Acinetobacter (genomic) species, definitive species identification requires the use of genotypic methods.

Description of Acinetobacter parvus sp. nov.
Acinetobacter parvus (par'vus. L. masc. adj. parvus small, referring to the fact that its colonies on agar media are significantly smaller than those of the other known Acinetobacter species).

Characteristics correspond to those of the genus (Juni, 1984Go). The description is based on the characterization of seven strains of different origin. Colonies on TSA after 24 h incubation at 30 °C are approximately 0·3–0·7 mm in diameter, circular, convex, smooth and slightly opaque with entire margins. Growth occurs at 35 °C but not at 41 °C. Growth at 37 °C usually occurs but may be reduced. Good growth on ethanol and acetate as sole sources of carbon and energy. Negative results in the following tests: acid production from D-glucose, haemolysis of sheep blood, gelatinase production and the utilization of DL-lactate, DL-4-aminobutyrate, trans-aconitate, citrate (Simmons), glutarate, L-aspartate, azelate, {beta}-alanine, L-histidine, D-malate, malonate, histamine, L-phenylalanine, phenylacetate, levulinate, citraconate, 4-hydroxybenzoate, L-tartrate, L-ornithine, L-leucine, L-arabinose and 2,3-butanediol.

The type strain is LMG 21765T (=LUH 4616T=NIPH 384T=CCM 7030T). Isolated from the ear of an outpatient. This strain grows well at 37 °C and has the following restriction patterns of amplified 16S rDNA: CfoI 1, AluI 2, MboI 1, RsaI 2, MspI 3. Its DNA G+C content is 41·8 %.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Dr A. T. Bernards (Leiden University Medical Center) and Dr J. Wagenaar (ID-Lelystad) for generous provision of strains.

Note added in proof
Since the study was completed, seven additional strains with typical A. parvus colonies have been studied in our laboratories. All of them were isolated from human clinical specimens (blood, ear pus, vaginal swab) and showed AFLP fingerprints, ARDRA profiles and biochemical properties typical of A. parvus. The only exception was the ability of three of these strains to grow on L-ornithine. Since this article was accepted for publication, seven new species of Acinetobacter have been described (Carr et al., 2003Go). Comparison of published 16S rDNA sequences and phenotypic characteristics did not show the identity of A. parvus with any of these species.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Bernards, A. T., de Beaufort, A. J., Dijkshoorn, L. & van Boven, C. P. A. (1997). Outbreak of septicaemia in neonates caused by Acinetobacter junii investigated by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and four typing methods. J Hosp Infect 35, 129–140.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bouvet, P. J. M. & Grimont, P. A. D. (1986). Taxonomy of the genus Acinetobacter with the recognition of Acinetobacter baumannii sp. nov., Acinetobacter haemolyticus sp. nov., Acinetobacter johnsonii sp. nov., and Acinetobacter junii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter lwoffii. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36, 228–240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bouvet, P. J. M. & Grimont, P. A. D. (1987). Identification and biotyping of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 138, 569–578.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bouvet, P. J. M. & Jeanjean, S. (1989). Delineation of new proteolytic genomic species in the genus Acinetobacter. Res Microbiol 140, 291–299.[Medline]

Carr, E. L., Kämpfer, P., Patel, B. K. C., Gürtler, V. & Seviour, R. J. (2003). Seven novel species of Acinetobacter isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 953–963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cruze, J. A., Singer, J. T. & Finnerty, W. R. (1979). Conditions for quantitative transformation in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. Curr Microbiol 3, 129–132.

Dijkshoorn, L., van Harsselaar, B., Tjernberg, I., Bouvet, P. J. M. & Vaneechoutte, M. (1998). Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis for identification of Acinetobacter genomic species. Syst Appl Microbiol 21, 33–39.[Medline]

Ezaki, T., Hashimoto, Y. & Yabuuchi, E. (1989). Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 224–229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gerner-Smidt, P. & Tjernberg, I. (1993). Acinetobacter in Denmark: II. Molecular studies of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex. APMIS 101, 826–832.[Medline]

Gerner-Smidt, P., Tjernberg, I. & Ursing, J. (1991). Reliability of phenotypic tests for identification of Acinetobacter species. J Clin Microbiol 29, 277–282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goris, J., Suzuki, K., De Vos, P., Nakase, T. & Kersters, K. (1998). Evaluation of a microplate DNA-DNA hybridization method compared with the initial renaturation method. Can J Microbiol 44, 1148–1153.[CrossRef]

Ibrahim, A., Gerner-Smidt, P. & Liesack, W. (1997). Phylogenetic relationship of the twenty-one DNA groups of the genus Acinetobacter as revealed by 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 837–841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Juni, E. (1972). Interspecies transformation of Acinetobacter: genetic evidence for a ubiquitous genus. J Bacteriol 112, 917–931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Juni, E. (1984). Genus III. Acinetobacter Brisou and Prévot 1954, 727AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, pp. 303–307. Edited by N. R. Krieg & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Mesbah, M., Premachandran, U. & Whitman, W. B. (1989). Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 159–167.

Nemec, A., Dijkshoorn, L. & Jezek, P. (2000). Recognition of two novel phenons of the genus Acinetobacter among non-glucose-acidifying isolates from human specimens. J Clin Microbiol 38, 3937–3941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nemec, A., De Baere, T., Tjernberg, I., Vaneechoutte, M., van der Reijden, T. J. K. & Dijkshoorn, L. (2001). Acinetobacter ursingii sp. nov. and Acinetobacter schindleri sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1891–1899.[Abstract]

Tjernberg, I. & Ursing, J. (1989). Clinical strains of Acinetobacter classified by DNA-DNA hybridization. APMIS 97, 595–605.[Medline]

Vaneechoutte, M., Tjernberg, I., Baldi, F., Pepi, M., Fani, R., Sullivan, E. R., van der Toorn, J. & Dijkshoorn, L. (1999). Oil-degrading Acinetobacter strain RAG-1 and strains described as ‘Acinetobacter venetianus sp. nov.’ belong to the same genomic species. Res Microbiol 150, 69–73.[Medline]

Willems, A., Doignon-Bourcier, F., Goris, J., Coopman, R., de Lajudie, P., De Vos, P. & Gillis, M. (2001). DNA–DNA hybridization study of Bradyrhizobium strains. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1315–1322.[Abstract]

Wilson, K. (1987). Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, pp. 2.4.1–2.4.5. Edited by F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith & K. Struhl. New York: Green Publishing and Wiley-Interscience.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
M. Vaneechoutte, A. Nemec, M. Musilek, T. J. K. van der Reijden, M. van den Barselaar, I. Tjernberg, W. Calame, R. Fani, T. De Baere, and L. Dijkshoorn
Description of Acinetobacter venetianus ex Di Cello et al. 1997 sp. nov.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, June 1, 2009; 59(6): 1376 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
A. Nemec, M. Musilek, M. Maixnerova, T. De Baere, T. J. K. van der Reijden, M. Vaneechoutte, and L. Dijkshoorn
Acinetobacter beijerinckii sp. nov. and Acinetobacter gyllenbergii sp. nov., haemolytic organisms isolated from humans
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, January 1, 2009; 59(1): 118 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
A. Y. Peleg, H. Seifert, and D. L. Paterson
Acinetobacter baumannii: Emergence of a Successful Pathogen
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2008; 21(3): 538 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
M. Vaneechoutte, T. De Baere, A. Nemec, M. Musilek, T. J. K. van der Reijden, and L. Dijkshoorn
Reclassification of Acinetobacter grimontii Carr et al. 2003 as a later synonym of Acinetobacter junii Bouvet and Grimont 1986
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, April 1, 2008; 58(4): 937 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Kilic, H. Li, A. Mellmann, A. C. Basustaoglu, M. Kul, Z. Senses, H. Aydogan, C. W. Stratton, D. Harmsen, and Y.-W. Tang
Acinetobacter septicus sp. nov. Association with a Nosocomial Outbreak of Bacteremia in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2008; 46(3): 902 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
J. Song, Y.-J. Choo, and J.-C. Cho
Perlucidibaca piscinae gen. nov., sp. nov., a freshwater bacterium belonging to the family Moraxellaceae
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, January 1, 2008; 58(1): 97 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. Rodriguez-Bano, S. Marti, A. Ribera, F. Fernandez-Cuenca, L. Dijkshoorn, A. Nemec, M. Pujol, and J. Vila
Nosocomial Bacteremia Due to an As Yet Unclassified Acinetobacter Genomic Species 17-Like Strain
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2006; 44(4): 1587 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
B. La Scola, V. A. K. B. Gundi, A. Khamis, and D. Raoult
Sequencing of the rpoB Gene and Flanking Spacers for Molecular Identification of Acinetobacter Species.
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 44(3): 827 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Vaneechoutte, D. M. Young, L. N. Ornston, T. De Baere, A. Nemec, T. Van Der Reijden, E. Carr, I. Tjernberg, and L. Dijkshoorn
Naturally Transformable Acinetobacter sp. Strain ADP1 Belongs to the Newly Described Species Acinetobacter baylyi
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2006; 72(1): 932 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
H. C. Chang, Y. F. Wei, L. Dijkshoorn, M. Vaneechoutte, C. T. Tang, and T. C. Chang
Species-Level Identification of Isolates of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii Complex by Sequence Analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA Gene Spacer Region
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2005; 43(4): 1632 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
A. Nemec, L. Dijkshoorn, and T. J.K. van der Reijden
Long-term predominance of two pan-European clones among multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains in the Czech Republic
J. Med. Microbiol., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 147 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nemec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaneechoutte, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nemec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaneechoutte, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nemec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaneechoutte, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS