IJSEM Visit JGV Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

Erratum

Description of Enterococcus canis sp. nov. from dogs and reclassification of Enterococcus porcinus Teixeira et al. 2001 as a junior synonym of Enterococcus villorum Vancanneyt et al. 2001, by E. M. De Graef, L. A. Devriese, M. Vancanneyt, M. Baele, M. D. Collins, K. Lefebvre, J. Swings and F. Haesebrouck

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology vol. 53, part 4, pp. 1069–1074

On p. 1073, towards the end of the description of Enterococcus canis sp. nov., the text should read as follows. 'Strains are negative in API tests for hippurate, β-glucuronidase, β-galactosidase and alkaline phosphatase, and positive in Crystal tests for hydrolysis of L-valine-AMC, 4MU-phosphate and L-isoleucine-AMC. Urease and 4MU-β-D-glucuronide are variable in Crystal tests. Acid is not produced from erythritol, L-xylose, adonitol, L-sorbose, rhamnose, dulcitol, sorbitol, α-methyl-D-mannoside, melibiose, inulin, melezitose, D-raffinose, glycogen, xylitol, D-turanose, D-lyxose, D- and L-fucose, D-tagatose, D- and L-arabitol, and 5-ketogluconate.'







This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS