IJSEM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Substrate utilization results
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kröckel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kröckel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kröckel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, W.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53 (2003), 513-517; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.02387-0
© 2003 International Union of Microbiological Societies


Note

Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov., isolated from raw fermented sausage

L. Kröckel1, U. Schillinger2, C. M. A. P. Franz2, A. Bantleon3 and W. Ludwig4

1 Bundesanstalt für Fleischforschung, E.-C.-Baumannstr. 20, D-95326 Kulmbach, Germany
2 Bundesforschungsanstalt für Ernährung, Haid- und Neustr. 9, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
3 VFG Labor GmbH & Co. KG, Nordfeldstr. 19, D-33775 Versmold, Germany
4 Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, TU München, Am Hochanger 4, D-85350 Freising, Germany

Correspondence
L. Kröckel
Kr\|[ouml ]\|ckel. m-kroeckel{at}baff-kulmbach.de


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov. (KU-3T) was isolated from raw fermented sausages. The new species was present in high numbers, and frequently dominated the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) populations of the products. 16S rDNA sequence data revealed that the isolates are closely related to the species Lactobacillus kimchii DSM 13961T, Lactobacillus paralimentarius DSM 13238T, Lactobacillus alimentarius DSM 20249T and Lactobacillus farciminis DSM 20184T. DNA–DNA reassociation data, however, clearly distinguished the new isolates from these species; they showed a low degree of DNA relatedness with the type strains of this group of phylogenetically closely related lactobacilli. These results warrant separate species status for strain KU-3T, for which the name Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is KU-3T (=DSM 14857T =NCCB 100034T =ATCC BAA-478T).


Abbreviations: LAB, lactic acid bacteria; RAPD, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA; rep-APD, repetitive primer-amplified polymorphic DNA

Published online ahead of print on 16 August 2002 as DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.02387-0.

The EMBL accession number for the 16S rRNA sequence of KU-3T is AJ496791.

A table showing species similarity based on substrate utilization is available as supplementary data in IJSEM Online (http://ijs.sgmjournals.org).


    MAIN TEXT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play an important role in the ripening process of raw fermented sausages. In European raw fermented sausages, strains of Lactobacillus sakei, Lactobacillus curvatus, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus pentosus are widely used as starter organisms (Jessen, 1995Go). In sausage fermentations performed at 18–23 °C, the indigenous microflora is usually dominated by strains of L. sakei and L. curvatus (Hammes et al., 1990Go; Hugas et al., 1993Go; Lücke, 1998Go). Other LAB frequently isolated from fermented sausages include Lactobacillus alimentarius, Lactobacillus farciminis, Lactobacillus hilgardii and Carnobacterium spp. (Collins et al., 1993Go; Holzapfel, 1998Go; Lücke, 1998Go; Schillinger & Lücke, 1987Go). In this study we describe a new species, Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov., which dominated the LAB flora of several German raw fermented sausages.

LAB strains were isolated from ROGOSA agar (Merck) during routine plate-count analyses of four German salami-type raw fermented sausages. Strains L470, L476 and KU-19 were isolated from sausages A, B and D, respectively, while KU-3T, KU-4 and KU-9 were from sausage C. Sausages A, B and D were products of a single factory, while sausage C was produced by another company. Reference strains included Lactobacillus kimchii DSM 13961T, Lactobacillus paralimentarius DSM 13238T, L. alimentarius DSM 20249T, L. farciminis DSM 20184T, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. tolerans DSM 20258T, L. curvatus DSM 20010, Lactobacillus amylophilus DSM 20533T and L. sakei DSM 20017T and DSM 20494. All LAB strains used in this study were grown in MRS broth or on MRS agar (de Man et al., 1960Go) at 30 °C.

Differential plate counts and determination of sausage pH were performed using standard methods. The LAB were differentiated on the basis of morphological and metabolic traits (Schillinger & Lücke, 1987Go). D(-)- and L(+)-lactate were determined from culture supernatants after 4 days growth using an enzymic test kit (Roche Diagnostics). Maximum NaCl tolerance was determined 5 days after inoculation.

BOX-rep-APD (repetitive primer-amplified polymorphic DNA using an upstream primer complementary to the 3' half of the sense strand of the A subunit of the BOX element) fingerprinting was performed essentially as described by Selenska-Pobell et al. (1996)Go. Total DNA from LAB, for use as a PCR template, was isolated as described by Cancilla et al. (1992)Go. Species-specific amplicons were derived from comparisons between different LAB species and strains of individual species. For randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, DNA was extracted as described by Björkroth & Korkeala (1996)Go and the M13 primer was used to generate the RAPD profiles (Andrighetto et al., 2001Go). BOX-rep-APD and RAPD patterns were analysed with Bionumerics software (Applied Maths). Similarity coefficients were calculated by using Pearson's product–moment correlation coefficient, and strains were grouped by using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA).

16S rRNA-encoding DNA fragments were amplified in vitro and sequenced directly as described by Springer et al. (1992)Go. The new 16S rRNA sequences were aligned with about 22 000 homologous full and partial sequences available in public databases (Ludwig, 1995Go), using the automated tools of the ARB software package (Ludwig & Strunk, 1996Go). Distance matrix, maximum-parsimony and maximum-likelihood methods were applied as implemented in the ARB software package. Different datasets were analysed, varying with respect to the sequences of outgroup reference organisms and the alignment positions selected according to their degrees of conservation.

For DNA–DNA hybridization experiments, DNA was isolated according to the guanidium thiocyanate method of Pitcher et al. (1989)Go. The DNA G+C content (mol%) was determined from the thermal melting temperature of DNA using a Gilford Response spectrophotometer. DNA hybridization was determined spectrophotometrically from renaturation rates, according to the method of De Ley et al. (1970)Go.

Genomic fingerprints of the unknown isolates produced by BOX-rep-APD, as well as by RAPD, showed a high degree of similarity: r=94·09 and 97·88, respectively (Fig. 1Go). They were clearly different from the profiles of other Lactobacillus species commonly found in raw sausages, including L. sakei and L. curvatus (data not shown), and they also did not show similarities to the profiles of the newly described species L. kimchii DSM 13961T or L. paralimentarius DSM 13238T (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Genomic fingerprints of L. versmoldensis sp. nov. strains and related LAB strains, generated with BOX-rep-APD and M13-RAPD.

 
According to 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic analyses, strain KU-3T, together with L. alimentarius DSM 20249T, L. farciminis DSM 20184T, L. kimchii DSM 13961T, Lactobacillus mindensis DSM 14500T and L. paralimentarius DSM 13238T (Cai et al., 1999Go; Ehrmann et al., 2003Go; Yoon et al., 2000Go), represents a subcluster among the Lactobacillaceae. However, strain KU-3T is a distant member of this group. The corresponding overall 16S rRNA sequence similarities for strain KU-3T and its closest relatives L. alimentarius DSM 20249T, L. farciminis DSM 20184T, L. kimchii DSM 13961T, L. mindensis DSM 14500T and L. paralimentarius DSM 13238T are 95·0, 95·0, 94·8, 95·6 and 94·9 %, respectively, whereas the latter organisms share 97·4 % or higher similarity with each other. The tree in Fig. 2Go is based on the results of a maximum-parsimony analysis of more than 20 000 homologous sequences, at least 90 % complete with respect to the Escherichia coli standard, as stored in the ARB database (Ludwig & Strunk, 1996Go). The tree topology was evaluated and corrected according to the results of distance matrix and maximum-likelihood analyses. Only those alignment positions that shared identical nucleotides in at least 50 % of the members of the cluster containing strain KU-3T were included for tree reconstruction. Multifurcations indicated that a common relative branching order could not be resolved or was not supported by applying the alternative treeing methods.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. 16S rRNA-based tree reflecting the phylogenetic relationships of L. versmoldensis sp. nov. (KU-3T), its closest relatives and selected reference organisms. Bar, 10 % sequence divergence.

 
DNA–DNA hybridization confirmed the species identity of the unknown isolates. DNA similarity between KU-3T and the isolates KU-4 and KU-9 was 101 and 100 %, respectively (101 % was obtained due to experimental error), while it was 60, 37, 30, 27, 17 and 5 % with L. paralimentarius DSM 13238T, L. kimchii DSM 13961T, L. alimentarius DSM 20249T, L. farciminis DSM 20184T, L. amylophilus DSM 20533T and L. sakei DSM 20017T, respectively, and thus below the threshold value of 70 % suggested for delineation of a new species (Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994Go). On the basis of these results, we propose the novel species Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov.

In agreement with the genotypic data, the physiological and biochemical test results clearly separated the unknown isolates from the other rod-shaped LAB. Their ability to grow on ROGOSA agar and the absence of gas production from glucose are typical reactions for the genus Lactobacillus and exclude Carnobacterium and Weissella, which also contain rod-shaped LAB, but are either non-aciduric or gas-producing (Collins et al., 1987Go, 1993Go; Kandler & Weiss, 1986Go; Schillinger & Holzapfel, 1995Go). Although the novel species is phylogenetically close to L. kimchii DSM 13961T, it can be easily differentiated from this species by its unique catabolic profile and growth physiology (Table 1Go). The DNA G+C content of 40·5 mol% is also higher than that of L. kimchii DSM 13961T and related species (35–38 mol%). The catabolic spectrum of the unknown sausage isolates was most similar to that of L. paracasei subsp. tolerans DSM 20258T (85 %) and least similar to that of L. kimchii DSM 13961T (45 %) (see supplementary data in IJSEM Online at http://ijs.sgmjournals.org). Similarities to L. curvatus DSM 20010, L. sakei DSM 20017T, L. alimentarius DSM 20249T, L. farciminis DSM 20184T and L. paralimentarius (DSM 13238T) were 79, 79, 61, 60 and 55 %, respectively. L. paracasei subsp. tolerans DSM 20258T can be readily differentiated from L. versmoldensis because it does not ferment melibiose or ribose. In contrast to typical representatives of L. curvatus and L. sakei, which in MRS broth either produce D(-)- and L(+)-lactic acid in approximately equal amounts or, as in the case of L. sakei, L(+)-lactate only (Kandler & Weiss, 1986Go), the new isolates produced 88–94 % L(+)-lactate. This, and the lack of growth at 4 °C, indicated that the new isolates could not belong to the L. curvatus/L. sakei cluster.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Differential characteristics of L. versmoldensis sp. nov. (KU-3T)

Strains: 1, L. versmoldensis sp. nov. KU-3T (this study); 2, L. kimchii DSM 13961T (Yoon et al., 2000Go); 3, L. paralimentarius DSM 13238T (Cai et al., 1999Go); 4, L. farciminis DSM 20184T (Reuter, 1983Go); 5, L. alimentarius DSM 20249T (Reuter, 1983Go). +, Positive; -, negative.

 
The new isolates were obtained from typical quick-ripened industrial salami-style meat products, which had been stored for up to 50 days at room temperature, either vacuum-packaged (sausages A, B and C in Table 2Go) or in the presence of a reducing atmosphere consisting of 20–30 % CO2 and 20–80 % N2 (sausage D in Table 2Go). The sausages were 70 mm in diameter, and contained either beef and pork (sausages A, B and D) or poultry and pork (sausage C). This type of sausage is characterized by pH values in the range 4·5–4·8 and a relatively high water content of 40 %, corresponding to a water activity of 0·93 (Lücke, 1998Go). According to the manufacturers, the sausage ingredients included glucose, lactose and except for sausage C, also maltose, i.e. sugars that the new isolates were able to ferment. LAB counts were within the expected limits of 107–108 c.f.u. g-1. The new Lactobacillus species was discovered in this study because it dominated the LAB flora on ROGOSA agar and because of discrepancies between colony counts on plate count agar and ROGOSA agar, especially for sausages A and C (Table 3Go). This was surprising as the total mesophilic aerobic plate counts on non-selective nutrient agar from salami-type fermented sausages are usually about the same as on ROGOSA agar, which was indeed the case at the beginning of the storage period (not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Details of sausages studied

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. LAB flora of the sausages

Taxa: 1, L. plantarum; 2, L. sakei/L. curvatus; 3, L. versmoldensis sp. nov. Data are bacterial counts given in log10 [c.f.u. (g sausage)-1].

 
The unexpectedly high abundance of L. versmoldensis in the examined sausages may be due to the low competitiveness of other LAB, including starter cultures as well as non-starter LAB, under the specific conditions of sausage storage in combination with a surplus of fermentable sugar(s). Factors common to all four sausages were that they contained lactose and were intended for retail at room temperature in vacuum or modified-atmosphere packages. This kind of retail was not practiced before the mid-1980s in Germany, where most of the big surveys on the microflora of fermented sausages had been completed. This may explain why L. versmoldensis was not detected earlier.

Description of Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov.
Lactobacillus versmoldensis (vers.mold.en'sis. N.L. masc. adj. versmoldensis pertaining to Versmold, the town in Germany where the strains were isolated).

Gram-positive, non-motile and non-spore-forming straight rods with rounded ends, 0·9x3·3 µm (0·9x1·6–6·0 µm) in size. Cells are found singly, in pairs and in small chains of generally four cells. Grows aerobically and anaerobically on ROGOSA and MRS agar, with better growth under anaerobic conditions. Grows better in MRS broth than on MRS agar. When transferred from MRS agar to MRS broth, a lag phase of up to 4 days may be observed. Cells aggregate during growth in MRS broth. Colonies on MRS agar after 3 days incubation at 30 °C are small (up to 1 mm in diameter), circular, convex with entire edges, greyish-white and catalase-negative. Growth occurs at 8–37 °C, but not at 4 or 42 °C. Homofermentative; no gas is produced from glucose. About 90 % of produced lactate is the L(+)-isomer. Ammonia is not produced from arginine. Maximum NaCl tolerance for growth in MRS broth is in the range 8–14 %. Galactose, lactose, maltose, glucose, melibiose and ribose are fermented. Arabinose, cellobiose, inulin, amygdalin, mannitol, melezitose, raffinose, rhamnose, sucrose, salicin, sorbitol, trehalose and xylose are not fermented.

The type strain, KU-3T (=DSM 14857T =NCCB 100034T =ATCC BAA-478T), was isolated from poultry salami. Reference strains are KU-4 and KU-9. The DNA G+C content of strain KU-3T is 40·5 mol%.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Jutta Popp and Dirk Vogel for their excellent technical assistance.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MAIN TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
Andrighetto, C., Zampese, L. & Lombardi, A. (2001). RAPD-PCR characterization of lactobacilli isolated from artisanal meat plants and traditional fermented sausages of Veneto region (Italy). Lett Appl Microbiol 33, 26–30.[CrossRef][Medline]

Björkroth, J. & Korkeala, H. (1996). Evaluation of Lactobacillus sake contamination in vacuum-packaged sliced cooked meat products by ribotyping. J Food Prot 59, 398–401.

Cai, Y., Okada, H., Mori, H., Benno, Y. & Nakase, T. (1999). Lactobacillus paralimentarius sp. nov., isolated from sourdough. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 1451–1455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cancilla, M. R., Powell, I. B., Hillier, A. J. & Davidson, B. E. (1992). Rapid genomic fingerprinting of Lactococcus lactis strains by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction with 32P and fluorescent labels. Appl Environ Microbiol 58, 1772–1775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collins, M. D., Farrow, J. A. E., Phillips, B. A., Ferusu, S. & Jones, D. (1987). Classification of Lactobacillus divergens, Lactobacillus piscicola, and some catalase-negative, asporogenous, rod-shaped bacteria from poultry in a new genus, Carnobacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 310–316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collins, M. D., Samelis, J., Metaxopoulos, J. & Wallbanks, S. (1993). Taxonomic studies on some leuconostoc-like organisms from fermented sausages: description of a new genus Weissella for the Leuconostoc paramesenteroides group of species. J Appl Bacteriol 75, 595–603.[Medline]

De Ley, J., Cattoir, H. & Reynaerts, A. (1970). The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 12, 133–142.[Medline]

de Man, J. C., Rogosa, M. & Sharpe, M. E. (1960). A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol 23, 130–135.

Ehrmann, M. A., Müller, M. R. A. & Vogel, R. F. (2003). Molecular analysis of sourdough reveals Lactobacillus mindensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 7–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hammes, W. P., Bantleon, A. & Min, S. (1990). Lactic acid bacteria in meat fermentation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 87, 165–174.[CrossRef]

Holzapfel, W. H. N. (1998). The Gram-positive bacteria associated with meat and meat products. In The Microbiology of Meat and Poultry, pp. 35–84. Edited by A. R. Davies & R. G. Board. London: Blackie.

Hugas, M., Garriga, M., Aymerich, T. & Monfort, J. M. (1993). Biochemical characterization of lactobacilli from dry fermented sausages. Int J Food Microbiol 18, 107–113.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jessen, B. (1995). Starter cultures for meat fermentation. In Fermented Meats, pp. 130–159. Edited by G. Campbell-Platt & P. E. Cook. London: Blackie.

Kandler, O. & Weiss, N. (1986). Regular, nonsporing Gram-positive rods. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 2, pp. 1208–1234. Edited by P. H. A. Sneath, N. S. Mair, M. E. Sharpe & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Lücke, F.-K. (1998). Fermented sausages. In Microbiology of Fermented Foods, Vol. 2, pp. 441–583. Edited by B. J. B. Wood. London: Blackie.

Ludwig, W. (1995). Sequence databases. In Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual, Chapter 3.3.5, pp. 1–22. Edited by A. D. L. Akkermans, J. D. van Elsas & F. J. De Bruijn. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Ludwig, W. & Strunk, O. (1996). ARB: a software environment for sequence data (http://www.mikro.biologie.tu-muenchen.de).

Pitcher, D. G., Saunders, N. A. & Owen, R. J. (1989). Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 8, 151–156.

Reuter, G. (1983). Lactobacillus alimentarius sp. nov., nom. rev. and Lactobacillus farciminis sp. nov., nom. rev. Syst Appl Microbiol 4, 277–279.

Schillinger, U. & Holzapfel, W. H. N. (1995). The genus Carnobacterium. In The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria, pp. 307–326. Edited by W. H. N. Holzapfel & B. J. B. Wood. London: Blackie.

Schillinger, U. & Lücke, F.-K. (1987). Identification of lactobacilli from meat and meat products. Food Microbiol 4, 199–208.[CrossRef]

Selenska-Pobell, S., Evguenieva-Hackenberg, E., Radeva, G. & Squartini, A. (1996). Characterization of Rhizobium ‘hedysari’ by RFLP analysis of PCR amplified rDNA and by genomic PCR fingerprinting. J Appl Bacteriol 80, 517–528.[Medline]

Springer, N., Ludwig, W., Drozanski, V., Amann, R. & Schleifer, K.-H. (1992). The phylogenetic status of Sarcobium lyticum, an obligate intracellular bacterial parasite of small amoebae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 96, 199–202.[CrossRef]

Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. (1994). Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 846–849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoon, J.-H., Kang, S.-S., Mheen, T.-I. & 7 other authors (2000). Lactobacillus kimchii sp. nov., a new species from kimchi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 1789–1795.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
G. El-Baradei, A. Delacroix-Buchet, and J.-C. Ogier
Biodiversity of Bacterial Ecosystems in Traditional Egyptian Domiati Cheese
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 15, 2007; 73(4): 1248 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
A. M. Rodas, S. Ferrer, and I. Pardo
Polyphasic study of wine Lactobacillus strains: taxonomic implications
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, January 1, 2005; 55(1): 197 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Substrate utilization results
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kröckel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kröckel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kröckel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS