IJSEM Visit JGV Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karavaiko, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pivovarova, T.'y. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karavaiko, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pivovarova, T.'y. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Karavaiko, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pivovarova, T.'y. A.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53 (2003), 113-119; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.02319-0
© 2003 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Phylogenetic heterogeneity of the species Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

Grigorii I. Karavaiko1, Tat'yana P. Turova1, Tamara F. Kondrat'eva1, Anatoli M. Lysenko1, Tat'yana V. Kolganova2, Svetlana N. Ageeva1, Lyudmila N. Muntyan1 and Tat'yana A. Pivovarova1

1 Institute of Microbiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. 60-letiya Oktyabrya 7, k. 2, Moscow 117811, Russia
2 Centre for Bioengineering, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. 60-letiya Oktyabrya 7, k. 1, Moscow 117312, Russia

Correspondence
Grigorii I. Karavaiko
gregor{at}inmi.host.ru


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Polyphasic genotypic analysis of 25 Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strains isolated from ores and ore concentrates collected in different regions of the world showed considerable strain heterogeneity. Restriction patterns of the chromosomal DNA of these strains obtained by PFGE were specific for each strain. According to the degree of DNA relatedness, 17 of the 23 strains studied were divided into four genomovars. Six independent, considerably divergent strains could not be assigned to any of the genomovars. A comparison of nearly complete nucleotide sequences of the 16S rDNA of five representatives of the genomovars (including the type strain of A. ferrooxidans, ATCC 23270T) with those of species of the genus Acidithiobacillus available from GenBank showed that most of the A. ferrooxidans strains, together with the type strain and some other strains of the species Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, comprised a monophyletic cluster. Within this major cluster, A. ferrooxidans strains fell into four phylogenetic groups that were equidistant from the phylogenetic group of A. thiooxidans strains. In general, the distribution of strains among the phylogenetic groups correlated with their distribution among the genomovars, except that the representatives of two different genomovars fell into one phylogenetic group. Thus, at least two levels of phylogenetic heterogeneity for A. ferrooxidans have been found. The phylogenetic heterogeneity of A. ferrooxidans strains, which are phenotypically indistinguishable, suggests the occurrence of microevolutionary processes in different econiches. This should be taken into account in the biohydrometallurgical applications of A. ferrooxidans strains.


The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rDNA sequences of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strains ATTC 2370T, TFN-d, TFI, TFD and TFY are AF465604AF465608.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The development of biohydrometallurgy calls for a comprehensive investigation of mesophilic chemolithotrophic microbial communities in extreme econiches characterized by low pH and high concentrations of metal ions. These communities are able to oxidize Fe2+ ions, sulfur and sulfide minerals and comprise a few phylogenetically unrelated groups of micro-organisms, i.e. some archaea, sulfobacilli, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and bacteria of the genus Thiobacillus, the taxonomy of which has recently been revised (Kelly & Wood, 2000Go). On the basis of the results of 16S rDNA sequence analysis, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans and Thiobacillus caldus were combined into a new genus, Acidithiobacillus, within the {gamma}-subclass of the Proteobacteria. Arbitrarily, the species Thiobacillus albertensis was also assigned to this genus, though the 16S rRNA genes of this species have yet to be sequenced.

The distinguishing feature of the species Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is its ability to derive energy from the oxidation of ferrous ions. Various strains of this species have been isolated from natural (rocks, ores and mine waters) and technological (ore concentrates and pulps of the gold and non-ferrous industries) sources. The habitats of A. ferrooxidans strains are geographically extremely diverse and vary in their physico-chemical conditions (presence of particular sulfide minerals and their ratio, pH, temperature and the content of toxic compounds in the liquid phase). This might explain the polymorphism of A. ferrooxidans strains, in terms of both their physiological properties (Tuovinen et al., 1971Go; Harrison, 1982Go; Valenti et al., 1989Go; Leduc & Ferroni, 1994Go; Chisholm et al., 1998Go; Frattini et al., 2000Go; Ageeva et al., 2001Go) and genotypic characteristics (Martin et al., 1981Go; Harrison, 1982Go; Shiratori et al., 1991Go; Kondratyeva et al., 1993Go, 1995Go; Rawlings & Kusano, 1994Go; Rawlings, 1999Go). The study of the natural genotypic and phenotypic variability of bacterial strains is of great importance in discerning the microevolutionary mechanisms of species formation and for their monitoring in biohydrometallurgical processes and in nature.

This study involved a polyphasic genotypic analysis of a large group of A. ferrooxidans strains isolated from different habitats and the evaluation of the phylogenetic heterogeneity of these strains.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Strains.
Experiments were conducted with 25 strains isolated from natural sulfide ores, their concentrates and dense pulps taken from pilot bacteriochemical reactors used for gold recovery and leaching of non-ferrous metals from sulfide ores and their concentrates (Table 1Go). All of the novel isolates were Gram-negative, motile, acidophilic, mesophilic, chemolithoautotrophic bacteria that obtained energy by the oxidation of Fe2+, S0 or sulfide minerals (Karavaiko et al., 1997Go; Kondratyeva et al., 1999Go; Ageeva et al., 2001Go). This allowed us to assign all of the novel isolates to the species A. ferrooxidans. This was supported by the genotypic analysis performed in this work. Nineteen strains, two of which (strains VKM B-458 and VKM B-1160) have been deposited in the All-Russia Collection of Microorganisms, were isolated in the Laboratory of Chemolithotrophic Micro-organisms, the Institute of Microbiology and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Two strains (ATCC 23270T and ATCC 19859) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Four identified strains (TFY, TF-16, TFP and TFR-2) were kindly donated by M. Vrvic, A. Torma, J. Hurtado and E. S. Kalyaeva.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. A. ferrooxidans strains and their isolation sites

Strains are grouped according to the type of ore/main sulfide minerals from the isolation site, as described in the text.

 
Cultivation.
A. ferrooxidans strains were cultivated at 28-30 °C in batch mode in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml of a medium described by Silverman & Lundgren (1959)Go. The flasks were shaken at 160 or 240 r.p.m. The initial pH of the medium was 1·8-2·0. The inoculum size comprised 10 % (v/v) of the growth medium.

DNA isolation.
A. ferrooxidans cells for the isolation of DNA were grown in unshaken 5 l bottles containing 3 l growth medium aerated at a rate of 3 l air min-1. Native DNA was isolated from cells as described by Kondratyeva et al. (1995)Go. In DNA-DNA hybridization experiments, DNA was isolated by the method of Marmur (1961)Go.

DNA analysis.
Chromosomal DNA was analysed by PFGE (Kondratyeva et al., 1995Go). The G+C content of the DNA was determined by the thermal denaturation method. The genome size and the level of DNA-DNA hybridization were evaluated from the DNA renaturation rates (De Ley et al., 1970Go).

16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing.
16S rRNA genes were amplified and sequenced using universal prokaryotic primers (Edwards et al., 1989Go). PCR amplifications were carried out using thermostable BioTaq polymerase (Dialat), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The volume of the reaction mixture was 20 µl. The PCR program consisted of one cycle of DNA denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, primer annealing at 50 °C for 3 min and DNA synthesis at 72 °C for 3 min, five cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 2 min and 72 °C for 30 s, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 40 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s and a final incubation at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were analysed by electrophoresis in 1 % agarose gel. Bands were visualized by illuminating ethidium bromide-stained gels on a BioKom UV transilluminator. 16S rDNA fragments were extracted from agarose gels using a Wizard PCR Preps kit (Promega) and sequenced by the method of Sanger et al. (1977)Go using a Silver Sequencing kit from the same manufacturer. These procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, with minor modifications. Electrophoresis was conducted using a Macrophor device (Pharmacia) and an SQ3 Sequencer (Hoefer) at a gel thickness of 0·19 mm.

Phylogenetic analysis.
The XbaI restriction profiles of native DNA of the strains under study were formalized according to the presence or absence of DNA fragments of a certain length and analysed using the maximum-parsimony algorithm realized in the PHYLIP software package (Felsenstein, 1989Go) and the neighbour-joining algorithm of the FREETREE program (Pavlicek et al., 1999Go). A dendrogram based on DNA-DNA hybridization data was constructed using an approximate similarity matrix, whose unknown terms were calculated based on mean values for the cluster, with the aid of the UPGMA algorithm of the PHYLIP software. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of analysed strains were aligned with those of the closest micro-organisms using CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al., 1994Go). An unrooted phylogenetic tree was generated with the aid of the neighbour-joining algorithm realized in the TREECON package (Van de Peer & De Wachter, 1994Go).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ecological diversity of strains
The sources of A. ferrooxidans strains (sulfide minerals from different geographical zones) can be divided into three groups (Table 1Go): (i) gold–arsenic ores and their concentrates; (ii) copper and copper–zinc ores and their concentrates; and (iii) other sources. The major sulfide minerals of gold–arsenic ores are pyrite (FeS2), arsenopyrite (FeAsS) and, in ores from the Olimpiadinskoe and Maiskoe deposits, pyrrhotite (FeS). Copper and copper–zinc ores from different deposits were mainly polymetallic, except that the copper ore from the Volkovskoe deposit (from which strain TFV-1 was isolated) contained primarily copper sulfide minerals. The major source of A. ferrooxidans strains isolated from coal deposits is pyrite. The pH of ore pulps depends on the composition of sulfide minerals and the activity of bacteriochemical processes in bioreactors. Correspondingly, the amounts of metal ions leached from ores into the liquid phase of ore pulps are different.

Analysis of chromosomal DNA relatedness by PFGE
PFGE of XbaI-digested DNA of various A. ferrooxidans strains showed that their genomes differ somewhat (Kondratyeva et al., 1993Go, 1995Go). Analysis of the DNA restriction profiles of 20 A. ferrooxidans strains by the maximum-parsimony algorithm showed that they fell into three clusters (Fig. 1Go). However, the confidence levels of most branching points of the dendrogram evaluated by bootstrap analysis were less than 70 %. This dendrogram correlated with that generated by the neighbour-joining algorithm (data not presented) with respect to only three branching points, whose bootstrap values exceeded 70 %.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of A. ferrooxidans strains derived from analysis of the lengths of nucleotide fragments obtained by the digestion of native chromosomal DNA with the restriction endonuclease XbaI.

 
The G+C content of DNA and the genome size
The G+C content of A. ferrooxidans strains varied from 56·1 to 58·1 mol%, and the genome size was 2·2–2·8x106 kDa (Table 2Go). The most frequent genome size was 2·3–2·4x106 kDa and the most frequent G+C content was about 57 mol%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. DNA G+C content and genome size of A. ferrooxidans strains

 
Similarity analysis of the total genomes by DNA--DNA hybridization
DNA-DNA hybridization analysis of 23 A. ferrooxidans strains with respect to 17 reference strains showed their considerable genetic heterogeneity (Fig. 2Go). The strains were divided into four groups characterized by a high degree of genome similarity. Such genome groups are presently called genomovars (Ursing et al., 1995Go; Rossello-Mora & Amann, 2001Go).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Approximate relatedness dendrogram of A. ferrooxidans strains derived from DNA-DNA hybridization data. The scale bar corresponds to the level of genome similarity.

 
Genomovars are commonly distinguished at a genome similarity level of 70 %, which is the typical level of genome similarity within a species (Wayne et al., 1987Go). However, some authors believe that this value for genome variability within a species should be raised to 50 % (Ursing et al., 1995Go; Vandamme et al., 1996Go). According to this criterion, the A. ferrooxidans strains under study were divided into four genomovars: (1) strains ATCC 23270T, ATCC 19859, TF-1292 and TFBk, with genome similarity levels of 59–96 %; (2) strains VKM B-1160, TFM, TFR-2, TFO, TFN-d and TFT, with genome similarity levels of 86–97 %; (3) strains TFY and TFL-2, with a genome similarity level of 92 %; and (4) strains TF-16, TFN, TFD, TFI and TFT-92, with genome similarity levels of 50–99 %. The remaining six A. ferrooxidans strains could not be assigned to any of the genomovars, since the similarity of their genomes to one another and to those of the strains comprising the genomovars was only 13-43 %.

Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA genes
We determined nearly complete nucleotide sequences (about 1450 nt) of the 16S rRNA genes of five A. ferrooxidans strains: the type strain, ATCC 23270T (genomovar 1), and strains TFN-d (genomovar 2), TFY (genomovar 3), TFI and TFD (genomovar 4). A comparative phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA genes was performed with respect to a large group of A. ferrooxidans strains, two validly described species of the genus Acidithiobacillus (Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and Acidithiobacillus caldus), a species of this genus that has not yet been validly described (‘Acidithiobacillus cuprithermicus’) and several strains of this genus whose 16S rDNA nucleotide sequences are available from the GenBank database.

According to the results of this analysis, most of the A. ferrooxidans strains, including the type strain, ATCC 23270T, constituted a monophyletic cluster with a 100 % bootstrap value (Fig. 3Go). Within this cluster, A. ferrooxidans strains fell into three phylogenetic groups. The only exception was A. ferrooxidans strain IFO 14245, which showed sequence similarity of 97·8-98·7 % to the 16S rRNA genes of the other members of this cluster and fell into none of the groups. The strain Acidithiobacillus sp. SSP, which was not identified to the species level, was assigned to phylogenetic group III, while phylogenetic group IV included the strains Acidithiobacillus spp. NO-8, NO-25, NO-37 and KSC-1, which were also not identified to the species level. The major phylogenetic cluster included not only A. ferrooxidans strains but also several strains of A. thiooxidans (including the type strain of this species) and the unidentified strain Acidithiobacillus sp. THA, all of which constituted phylogenetic group V. The high bootstrap values of the branching points of the phylogenetic tree (not less than 87 %) confirm the statistical significance of the above phylogenetic grouping. DNA similarity levels within and between the phylogenetic groups were respectively 97·8-100 and 96·7-99·2 %. The highest level of intergroup divergence of 16S rRNA gene sequences (1·8-3·3 %) was observed for phylogenetic group V of A. thiooxidans strains.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Unrooted phylogenetic tree of various representatives of the genus Acidithiobacillus showing the position of the A. ferrooxidans strains ATCC 23270T, TFN-d, TFI, TFD and TFY. Bar, 5 nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides (evolutionary distance). Numerals near internal branches refer to bootstrap replications (out of 100 resampling) confirming the grouping of the species to the right of the branch. Bootstrap values of less than 85 % are not shown. Square brackets indicate that the current identification of a given strain is not confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequence data.

 
The strains of A. caldus, including the type strain of this species, constituted another monophyletic cluster with a bootstrap value of 97 %. This cluster also included ‘A. cuprithermicus (91·3-94·5 % similarity) and Acidithiobacillus spp. strains TC-1 and GO-1. The similarity of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of A. caldus strains within this cluster was 98·3–99·7 %, whereas the similarity of this cluster with respect to A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans strains was considerably lower (88·1-96·7 %).

Some A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans strains could not be affiliated with the major phylogenetic cluster. Strains [A. thiooxidans] DSM 612 and [A. thiooxidans] KCTC 8929P took an intermediate position between A. ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans and A. caldus, showing 88·7-96·9 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (square brackets indicate that the current identification of a given strain is not confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequence data). Strain [A. ferrooxidans] LM2 was found to be close to the A. caldus type strain, DSM 8584T (99·2 % similarity). On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, three Acidithiobacillus strains, [A. ferrooxidans] DSM 2392 (79·9-88·4 % similarity), [A. thiooxidans] KCTC 8928P (76·1-82·2 %) and [A. thiooxidans] KCTC 8930P (68·1-76·6 %), could not be assigned to this genus.

All newly studied A. ferrooxidans strains belonged to the major phylogenetic cluster, which also included A. thiooxidans strains (Fig. 3Go). The type strain of A. ferrooxidans fell within phylogenetic group I (99·3-100 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity), strain TFN-d fell within group II (99·7-99·9 %) and strains TFI, TFD and TFY fell within phylogenetic group III (99·0-100 %).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Comparative analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of presently known A. ferrooxidans strains showed their close phylogenetic relatedness and therefore, their common evolutionary history. According to the results of this analysis, the previously unidentified Acidithiobacillus strains NO-8, NO-25, NO-37, KSC-1 and SSP should be assigned to the species A. ferrooxidans. The common origin of most A. ferrooxidans strains was confirmed by the low level of variability of the nucleotide composition of the DNA and the genome size of the strains studied. At the same time, strains of this species isolated from different habitats exhibited considerable genotypic diversity, which manifested itself as a noticeable divergence of their 16S rRNA gene sequences, a low level of similarity for total DNA and significant differences in the structure of chromosomal DNA revealed by PFGE.

The genotypic heterogeneity of the species A. ferrooxidans is evident even from the analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, which are generally much more conservative than the total bacterial genome sequence. This heterogeneity shows up in the grouping of strains belonging to this species into four phylogenetic groups. The data on DNA-DNA hybridization also indicate high genotypic divergence of A. ferrooxidans strains, which, with the exception of six independent considerably divergent strains, constitute four groups characterized by a high level of genome similarity (genomovars). These data agree well with the earlier findings of Harrison (1982)Go, who also revealed five groups of A. ferrooxidans strains corresponding to genomovars and several strains that could not be affiliated with any of these groups. The high level of DNA–DNA relatedness (96 %) of the genomes of strain ATCC 19859 and the type strain ATCC 23270T suggests that all the allied strains studied by Harrison and us constitute one genomovar and therefore, that the members of this genomovar must be widespread in nature. It can also be suggested that analysis of a larger group of A. ferrooxidans strains than those studied by Harrison and us may disclose several additional genomovars among these strains.

Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strains studied by DNA–DNA hybridization by Harrison (1982)Go allowed us, in addition, to compare the results yielded by the two methods, and showed that A. ferrooxidans strains ATCC 19859 and F221 from phylogenetic group I belong to one genomovar, while strains IFO 14262, from phylogenetic group II, and IFO 14245, from a separate phylogenetic branch, represent two other genomovars.

Therefore, in general, the results of the DNA-DNA hybridization analysis of A. ferrooxidans strains do not contradict the results of analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, except that the latter analysis combines the representatives of two different genomovars (strain TFY from genomovar 3 and strains TFI and TFD from genomovar 4) into one phylogenetic group. The data presented provide evidence that there are at least two levels of genotypic divergence for A. ferrooxidans. Phylogenetic grouping based on analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences represents a higher level of the genotypic divergence of A. ferrooxidans strains, whereas the division of these strains into genomovars in accordance with the species criterion of Wayne et al. (1987)Go reflects the lower level of their divergence.

The DNA-DNA hybridization analysis of A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans strains carried out by Harrison (1982)Go showed low genome similarity (not more than 23 %). Moreover, most of the A. thiooxidans strains studied, including the type strain but excluding strain DSM 612, were found to belong to one genomovar. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of A. thiooxidans strains, including the type strain, showed that they belong to the same phylogenetic cluster as the majority of A. ferrooxidans strains, constituting a separate phylogenetic group equidistant from the other phylogenetic groups of this cluster. These data indicate a close relatedness of the species A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans and allow the suggestion to be made that the latter species has diverged from the former species because of a gradual accumulation of phenotypic differences. According to the findings of Harrison (1982)Go, A. thiooxidans strain DSM 612 does not belong to the same genomovar as other A. thiooxidans strains. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences confirmed the incorrect taxonomic identification of this strain, as well as of some other strains such as KCTC 8929P and LM2 (the latter strain probably belongs to the species A. caldus). As for strains DSM 2392, KCTC 8928P and KCTC 8930P, they do not belong to the genus Acidithiobacillus at all.

Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the degree of relatedness of the species A. caldus to A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans is lower than the degree of relatedness between the latter two species. The species ‘A. cuprithermicus was affiliated with the phylogenetic cluster of the species A. caldus (with a bootstrap value of 98 %), which casts doubt on the existence of ‘A. cuprithermicus’ as a separate species.

The genotypic heterogeneity of A. ferrooxidans and other species brings up the question of whether they appear as a result of microevolutionary processes within one species or arise through the convergence of several species. The data presented here, in particular those indicating the monophylicity of strains, suggest that their genotypic differences are due to microevolutionary processes. As is evident from the results of analysis of chromosomal DNA by PFGE, these processes may change the location of some genes, while their expression will be retained.

Another problem is the degree of intraspecies variability and the validity of using various physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic methods in the taxonomy of A. ferrooxidans. If we insist that the isolates studied in this work do belong to A. ferrooxidans, then this heterogeneous species is a combination of several groups of strains that have similar phenotypes but differ in their 16S rRNA gene sequences and in the composition of their total genomes. This difficulty is a specific example of the general taxonomic problem concerning agreement between the results of phenotypic and genotypic analyses. The taxonomic division of a phylogenetically heterogeneous species into genomovars and then into separate species occurs as the number of distinguishing phenotypic characteristics of these genomovars increases. It can be suggested that some genomovars of A. ferrooxidans may turn out to be separate species, as was the case with the species A. thiooxidans.

The DNA restriction profiles, obtained by PFGE, for A. ferrooxidans strains cannot adequately characterize the degree of their genome similarity, as is evident from the differences in the dendrograms (of these strains) that were generated using different algorithms. Even the most statistically significant clusters of these dendrograms do not coincide with genomovars determined by DNA–DNA hybridization. This can be accounted for by the fact that PFGE is able to detect point mutations at restriction sites, changes in the locations of IST elements (insertion sequences; Yates & Holmes, 1987Go) and plasmid–chromosome recombinations, i.e. events that do not alter significantly the nucleotide sequence of the total genome. PFGE is the most sensitive method of DNA analysis applied to the evaluation of intraspecies genome divergence. Unlike chromosomal DNA restriction patterns, the less-sensitive 16S rDNA fingerprinting technique fails to differentiate A. ferrooxidans strains from each other, but can differentiate them from A. caldus strains (Kamimura et al., 2001Go). In other words, study of the structure of the chromosomal DNA of A. ferrooxidans strains by PFGE cannot evaluate the degree of similarity of the genomes of these strains (and, therefore, the degree of their relatedness) but can detect genetic variability. This method is also of particular value in the individual characterization (‘passportization’) of microbial strains, especially those used in biohydrometallurgy, and for monitoring natural microbial communities.

It is interesting to ask whether there is a geographical correlation between the diversity of A. ferrooxidans strains and their origin. Like Harrison (1982)Go, we failed to reveal such a correlation, although Harrison interpreted his data as an indication of selection of particular genotypes in microeconiches of particular geographical zones. Our data may be interpreted as indicating the existence of a certain degree of correlation between the similarity of the genomes of A. ferrooxidans strains and the mineralogical characteristics of their habitats. For instance, most strains of genomovar 2 (TFO, TFM, TFN-d and TFT) were isolated from gold–arsenic pyrite–arsenopyrite ores and concentrates, although some other strains of this genomovar, such as VKM B-1160 and TFR-2, were isolated from other natural substrates. It is conceivable that large-scale investigations of the genotypic features of indigenous bacterial strains in relation to the properties of their habitats might provide an insight into the role of natural substrates in the microevolution of A. ferrooxidans. This is illustrated by our data on the degree of adaptation of particular strains to oxidation substrates (Fe2+, S0 and sulfide minerals) (Ageeva et al., 2001Go): each strain attained its own adaptation level determined by the strain's history. At the same time, each indigenous A. ferrooxidans strain isolated from an econiche with a particular mineralogical composition of oxidation substrates was characterized by its own chromosomal DNA restriction pattern. In biohydrometallurgical technologies, indigenous strains are always dominant in the pulps of gold and non-ferrous metal ores and concentrates, gradually displacing other introduced strains. Intense oxidative processes in these pulps activate microevolutionary processes and thus promote the formation of new A. ferrooxidans strains. These strains differ in terms of the structure of chromosomal DNA, plasmid composition, optimal pH and temperature values for growth, the growth and substrate oxidation rates, resistance to heavy-metal ions, adaptability and adaptation thresholds. This may explain the failure of attempts to introduce, into natural environments, artificially constructed microbial strains that are highly productive under laboratory conditions.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported by grants nos 99-48360, 00-15-97765 and 01-04-48270 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and by grants within the scope of the Russian State Scientific and Technical Programme ‘Advanced Methods in Bioengineering’.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ageeva, S. N., Kondrat'eva, T. F. & Karavaiko, G. I. (2001). Phenotypic characteristics of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans strains. Mikrobiologiya 70, 226–234 (in Russian).

Chisholm, I. A., Leduc, L. G. & Ferroni, G. D. (1998). Metal resistance and plasmid DNA in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73, 245–254.[CrossRef][Medline]

De Ley, J., Cattoir, H. & Reynaerts, A. (1970). The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 12, 133–142.[Medline]

Edwards, U., Rogall, T., Blocker, H., Emde, M. & Bottger, E. C. (1989). Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Nucleic Acids Res 17, 7843–7853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Felsenstein, J. (1989). PHYLIP – phylogenetic inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5, 164–166.

Frattini, C. J., Leduc, L. G. & Ferroni, G. D. (2000). Strain variability and the effects of organic compounds on the growth of the chemolithotrophic bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 77, 57–64.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harrison, A. P. Y. (1982). Genomic and physiological diversity amongst strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and genomic comparison with Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Arch Microbiol 131, 68–76.[CrossRef]

Kamimura, K., Wakai, S. & Sugio, T. (2001). Identification of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans strains based on restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S rDNA. Microbios 105, 141–152.[Medline]

Karavaiko, G. I., Kondratyeva, T. F., Pivovarova, T. A. & Muntyan, L. N. (1997). Physiological and genetic characterization of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans strains used in biohydrometallurgy. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol 33, 532–538 (in Russian).

Kelly, D. P. & Wood, A. P. (2000). Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 511–516.[Abstract]

Kondratyeva, T. F., Muntyan, L. N. & Karavaiko, G. I. (1993). Analysis of restriction patterns of chromosomal DNA of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans strains by pulse electrophoresis. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol 4, 19–22 (in Russian).

Kondratyeva, T. F., Muntyan, L. N. & Karavaiko, G. I. (1995). Zinc- and arsenic-resistant strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans have increased copy numbers of chromosomal resistance genes. Microbiology 141, 1157–1162.

Kondratyeva, T. F., Pivovarova, T. A., Muntyan, L. N. & Karavaiko, G. I. (1999). Strain diversity of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and its significance in biohydrometallurgy. In Biohydrometallurgy and the Environment. Towards the Mining of the 21st Century, part B, pp. 89–96. Edited by R. Amils & A. Ballester. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Leduc, L. G. & Ferroni, G. D. (1994). The chemolithotrophic bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. FEMS Microbiol Rev 14, 103–120.[CrossRef]

Marmur, J. A. (1961). A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 3, 208–218.

Martin, P. A. W., Dugan, P. R. & Tuovinen, O. H. (1981). Plasmid DNA in acidophilic, chemolithotrophic thiobacilli. Can J Microbiol 27, 850–853.[Medline]

Pavlicek, A., Hrda, S. & Flegr, J. (1999). FreeTree – freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and bootstrap/jackknife analysis of the tree robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of genus Frenkelia. Folia Biol (Praha) 45, 97–99.

Rawlings, D. E. (1999). The molecular genetics of mesophilic, acidophilic, chemolithotrophic, iron- or sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms. In Biohydrometallurgy and the Environment. Towards the Mining of the 21st Century, part B, pp. 3–20. Edited by R. Amils & A. Ballester. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Rawlings, D. E. & Kusano, T. (1994). Molecular genetics of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Microbiol Rev 58, 39–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rossello-Mora, R. & Amann, R. (2001). The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25, 39–67.[Medline]

Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. (1977). DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74, 5463–5467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shiratori, T., Inoue, C., Numata, M. & Kusano, T. (1991). Characterization and cloning of plasmids from the iron-oxidizing bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Curr Microbiol 23, 321–326.[CrossRef]

Silverman, M. P. & Lundgren, D. E. (1959). Study on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. I. An improved medium and harvesting procedure for securing high cell yield. J Bacteriol 77, 642–647.[Free Full Text]

Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tuovinen, O. H., Niemela, S. I. & Gyllenberg, H. G. (1971). Tolerance of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans to some metals. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 37, 489–496.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ursing, J. B., Rosselló-Mora, R. A., García-Valdés, E. & Lalucat, J. (1995). Taxonomic note: a pragmatic approach to the nomenclature of phenotypically similar genomic groups. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Valenti, P., Polidoro, M., Buonfiglio, V., Visca, P. & Orsi, N. (1989). Comparative analysis of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans strains. In Biohydrometallurgy, pp. 187–201. Edited by J. Salley, R. G. L. McCready & P. L. Wichlacz. Ottawa: CANMET.

Vandamme, P., Pot, B., Gillis, M., De Vos, P., Kersters, K. & Swings, J. (1996). Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev 60, 407–438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van de Peer, Y. & De Wachter, R. (1994). TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput Appl Biosci 10, 569–570.[Free Full Text]

Wayne, L. G., Brenner, D. J., Colwell, R. R. & 9 other authors (1987). International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 463–464.[Free Full Text]

Yates, J. R. & Holmes, D. S. (1987). Two families of repeated DNA sequences in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol 169, 1861–1870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
Y. Ni, D. Wan, and K. He
16S rDNA and 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer sequence analyses reveal inter- and intraspecific Acidithiobacillus phylogeny
Microbiology, August 1, 2008; 154(8): 2397 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
P. Bruscella, L. Cassagnaud, J. Ratouchniak, G. Brasseur, E. Lojou, R. Amils, and V. Bonnefoy
The HiPIP from the acidophilic Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is correctly processed and translocated in Escherichia coli, in spite of the periplasm pH difference between these two micro-organisms
Microbiology, May 1, 2005; 151(5): 1421 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
K. Nanba, G. M. King, and K. Dunfield
Analysis of Facultative Lithotroph Distribution and Diversity on Volcanic Deposits by Use of the Large Subunit of Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2004; 70(4): 2245 - 2253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karavaiko, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pivovarova, T.'y. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karavaiko, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pivovarova, T.'y. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Karavaiko, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pivovarova, T.'y. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS