HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Table and Figures Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stoeck, T. Articles by Boenigk, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stoeck, T. Articles by Boenigk, J. Agricola Articles by Stoeck, T. Articles by Boenigk, J.

Multigene phylogenies of clonal Spumella-like strains, a cryptic heterotrophic nanoflagellate, isolated from different geographical regions

Thorsten Stoeck¹, Steffen Jost^1, and Jens Boenigk²

¹ School of Biology, University Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger Str. 14, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
² Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Limnology, Mondseestr. 9, A-5310 Mondsee, Austria

Correspondence
Thorsten Stoeck
stoeck{at}rhrk.uni-kl.de

Many nanoflagellate morphospecies comprise an enormous variation of genotypes, probably indicating cryptic species. One of the best-investigated morphospecies with respect to molecular and ecophysiological variation are flagellates of the Spumella morphotype. Here, we have phylogenetically analysed three protein-coding genes (actin, alpha-tubulin, beta-tubulin), internal transcribed spacers (ITS1, ITS2) and the 5.8S rDNA of 17 Spumella-like strains isolated from soil, freshwater and marine samples in order to (i) test the validity of the current Spumella-like phylogenetic classification system based exclusively on small subunit (SSU) rDNA, (ii) elucidate the phylogenetic associations of SSU rDNA-unresolved strains and (iii) evaluate the validity of the assignment of ecophysiological adaptations to previously identified SSU rDNA sequence clades. All single-gene analyses show different patterns of support, are incongruent and identify a number of conflicting nodes. Likewise, a concatenation of all protein genes fails to recover specific SSU rDNA clades. However, a combined analysis of all genes confidently resolved the conflicts of the single genes and the protein-gene concatenations and resulted in a tree topology that is identical to the SSU rDNA analysis, but with enhanced phylogenetic resolution and decisively greater support. We conclude that, depending on the genes concatenated, a ‘supergene’ analysis minimizes artefactual effects of single genes and may be superior in its performance in phylogenetically analysing cryptic species. We confirm the validity of the SSU rDNA Spumella-like phyloclades and support the suggestion that these clades indeed seem to reflect certain ecophysiological adaptations.

Present address: Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Limnology, Mondseestr. 9, A-5310 Mondsee, Austria.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the SSU rDNA, ITS, alpha- and beta-tubulin and actin sequences reported in this paper are EF577164–EF577234, as detailed in Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1.

Details of GenBank accession numbers and further phylogenetic trees for the ITS locus, the actin gene, the alpha-tubulin gene and the beta-tubulin gene and concatenations of the actin, beta- and alpha-tubulin genes and the actin, beta-tubulin, alpha-tubulin and SSU rDNA genes are available as supplementary material with the online version of this paper.