IJSEM Journal of Clinical Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Vicente, A. C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Vicente, A. C. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Vicente, A. C. P.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58 (2008), 617-621; DOI  10.1099/ijs.0.65461-0
© 2008 International Union of Microbiological Societies

Identification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus by multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA)

Cristiane C. Thompson1,2, Fabiano L. Thompson2 and Ana Carolina P. Vicente1

1 Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2 Department of Genetics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Correspondence
Cristiane C. Thompson
thompson{at}ioc.fiocruz.br

Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus have similar phenotypes and genomes making rapid differentiation of these two species difficult. The first standard multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) scheme for the identification of these species is described. A collection of 45 representative isolates from different geographical regions and hosts was examined using segments of the housekeeping genes pyrH, recA and rpoA. Overall, the closest phylogenetic neighbours of these species were Vibrio furnissii and Vibrio fluvialis. V. cholerae and V. mimicus formed separate species clusters on the basis of each gene, suggesting that these genes are useful as identification markers. These species clusters arose by the accumulation of point mutations. The pyrH gene showed the highest resolution for differentiating V. cholerae and V. mimicus. The maximum interspecies pyrH gene sequence similarity was 91 %. Clearly, V. mimicus strains were more heterogeneous than V. cholerae strains at the three loci. It is suggested that vibrio species may be defined on the basis of MLSA data. A vibrio species was defined as a group of strains forming a monophyletic group on the basis of these loci and with an intraspecific sequence similarity of at least 95 %. V. cholerae and V. mimicus isolates can be readily identified through the open database resource ‘The Taxonomy of Vibrios’ (http://www.taxvibrio.lncc.br/).


Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism; MLSA, multilocus sequence analysis

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the pyrH, recA and rpoA gene sequences of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus are EF990257–EF990363 and EU147787–EU147789.

Tables detailing the sources of the strains used in this study, the primers used for amplification and sequencing of the three loci, features of the genes and signatures of the V. cholerae and V. mimicus pyrH, recA and rpoA genes are available with the online version of this paper. Information is also available on how the recombination analysis was performed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the International Union of Microbiological Societies.