HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content

Rejection of Clostridium putrificum and conservation of Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium sporogenes - Opinion 69

Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology

The Judicial Commission rejected the name Clostridium putrificum while conserving Clostridium botulinum for toxigenic strains and conserving Clostridium sporogenes for non-toxigenic strains.

Key Words: Clostridium putrificum • Clostridium botulinum • Clostridium sporogenes • Judicial Opinion 69

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-P. Carlier, G. K'ouas, A. Lozniewski, F. Sirveaux, P. Cailloux, and F. Mory Osteosynthesis-Associated Bone Infection Caused by a Nonproteolytic, Nontoxigenic Clostridium botulinum-Like Strain J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2004; 42(1): 484 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]